涉外同性婚姻在我国的法律适用研究
Study on the Application Law of Foreign-Related Homosexual Marriage in China
摘要: 随着性人权运动的兴起和我国对外开放程度的不断加深,涉外同性婚姻在我国的法律适用成为学界的研究重点。我国作为多法域主权国家,仅台湾地区承认同性婚姻合法化,而大陆、香港和澳门地区均否认同性婚姻的效力。涉外同性婚姻在我国的法律适用涉及选法、公共秩序保留和法律规避问题,为了促进我国与他国在国际私法层面上的必要交往,应细化选法路径、合理谨慎运用公共秩序保留制度、充分识别法律规避行为,以保障同性伴侣的合法权益。
Abstract: With the rise of the sexual human rights movement and the deepening of China’s opening to the world, the study on the appli-cation law of foreign-related homosexual marriage in China has become the focus of academic re-search. As a multi-jurisdictional sovereign state, only Taiwan recognizes the legalization of homo-sexual marriage, while the mainland, Hong Kong and Macau all deny the validity of homosexual marriage. The application law of foreign-related homosexual marriage in China involves issues of law selection, public order reservation and evasion of law. In order to promote the necessary exchanges between China and other countries at the level of private international law, it is necessary to refine the selection of law, use the public order reservation reasonably and carefully, and fully identify the behaviors of evasion of law to protect the legitimate rights of homosexual couples.
文章引用:王艳平. 涉外同性婚姻在我国的法律适用研究[J]. 争议解决, 2022, 8(2): 193-202. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2022.82027

参考文献

[1] 方刚. 多元的性别[M]. 济南: 山东人民出版社, 2012: 170.
[2] 彭思彬. 涉外同性婚姻法律适用问题研究[J]. 三峡大学学报: 人文社会科学版, 2016, 38(2): 71-72.
[3] 丁伟. 国际私法学[M]. 第3版. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2013: 98.
[4] 刘风景. 准用性法条设置的理据与方法[J]. 法商研究, 2015, 32(5): 49.
[5] 杨诗鉴. 涉外同性婚姻在中国的效力问题研究[J]. 太原学院学报(社会科学版), 2020, 21(4): 49.
[6] 何群. 涉外同性婚姻法律适用问题研究[J]. 河北法学, 2012, 30(10): 138.
[7] Koppelman, A. (1997) Same-Sex Marriage, Choice of Law, and Public Policy. Texas Law Review, 76, 999.
[8] 王艺. 外国判决承认中公共秩序保留的怪圈与突围——以一起跨国代孕案件为中心[J]. 法商研究, 2018, 35(1): 170.
[9] 张碧江. 试论涉外同性婚姻的法律适用[J]. 兰州教育学院学报, 2016, 32(3): 150.
[10] 潘灯. 涉外同性婚姻在中国的法律地位[J]. 云南大学学报(法学版), 2012, 25(1): 191.
[11] 袁发强. 同性婚姻与我国区际私法中的公共秩序保留[J]. 河北法学, 2007, 25(3): 58.
[12] Xiao, P. and Li, J. (2019) Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Union in Same-Sex Relationships. US-China Law Review, 16, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Chamberlain, G. (2004) A Religious Argument for Same-Sex Marriage. Seattle Journal for Social Justice, 2, 499-500.
[14] Sogabe, M. (2020) Status of Same-Sex Mar-riage Legislation in Japan. National Taiwan University Law Review, 15, 5-8.
[15] Kramer, L. (1996) The Public Policy Exception and the Problem of Extra-Territorial Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage. QLR, 16, 154-157.
[16] Hogue, L. (1998-1999) State Common-Law Choice-of-Law Doctrine and Same-Sex Marriage: How Will States Enforce the Public Policy Exception. Creighton Law Review, 32, 30.
[17] McClain, L.C. (1998) Deliberative Democracy, Overlapping Consensus, and Same-Sex Marriage. Fordham Law Review, 66, 1244-1255.
[18] Laycock, D. and Berg, T.C. (2013) Protecting Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty. Virginia Law Review Online, 99, 1-3.
[19] 涂广建. 港、澳回归后的我国区际私法: 成就、反思与展望[J]. 国际法研究, 2021(2): 125.
[20] Silberman, L. (2005) Symposium: Current Debates in the Conflict of Laws: Recognition and Enforcement of Same- Sex Marriage. University of Pennsylva-nia Law Review, 153, 2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef