分散注意下汉语单字词加工的知觉容量
Perceptual Capacity in the Processing of Chinese Single-Character Words in the Divided Attention
摘要: 在分散注意下,同时加工多个词汇所获得的信息数量取决于知觉容量。以往关于英语词汇的研究均表明,分散注意条件下,一次注视中只能正确加工一个词汇的语义,符合全或无的序列加工模型。本研究采用汉语单字词验证了汉语词汇语义加工中的知觉容量,采用2 (注意条件:集中、分散) × 2 (词频:高频、低频)的被试内设计探讨汉语单字词加工中是否存在知觉容量限制,其视觉偏侧化情况与词频的影响。结果发现:1) 分散注意下汉语单字词加工符合平行的加工方式。2) 汉语单字词的语义加工未表现出视觉偏侧化。3) 词频对语义加工的影响显著,但对知觉容量无显著影响。
Abstract: Under the divided attention, the amount of information obtained from processing multiple words simultaneously depends on the perceptual capacity. Previous studies on English words have shown that, only one word can be processed correctly in a single fixation under the divided attention condition, which conforms to the all-or-nothing serial processing model. This experiment verified the perceptual capacity in the semantic processing of Chinese words by using Chinese single-character words, the within-subject design of 2 (attention condition: focus, divided) × 2 (word frequency: high, low) was carried out to explore that if the perceptual capacity limit exists in the semantic processing of Chinese single-character words, and the performance of visual lateralization and the effect of frequency. The results showed that: 1) The processing of Chinese single-character words in the divided attention conforms to the parallel processing way. 2) There is no visual lateralization in the processing of Chinese single-character words. 3) There is a significant effect of frequency on the semantic processing, however, no significant effect of frequency on the perceptual capacity is found.
文章引用:韩依恬. 分散注意下汉语单字词加工的知觉容量[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2022, 11(8): 3555-3562. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2022.118487

参考文献

[1] Broadbent, D.E. (1958) Perception and Communication. Pergamon Press, New York. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Kahneman, D. (1973) Attention and Effort. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
[3] Treisman, A.M. (1964) Verbal Cues, Language, and Meaning in Selective Attention. American Journal of Psychology, 77, 206-219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Neisser, U. (1967) Cognitive Psychology. Apple-ton-Century-Crofts, New York.
[5] Broadbent, D.E.J. (1971) Decision and Stress. Academic Press, London.
[6] Keele, S.W. (1973) Attention and Human Performance. Goodyear, Pacific Palisades.
[7] Duncan, J. (1980) The Locus of Interference in the Perception of Simultaneous Stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 272-300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Shiffrin, R.M. (1975) The Locus and Role of Attention in Memory Systems. In: Rabbitt, P.M.A. and Domic, S., Eds., Attention and Performance V, Academic Press, London, 6-7.
[9] Allport, D.A. (1977) On Knowing the Meaning of Words We Are Unable to Report: The Effects of Visual Masking. In: Dornic, S., Ed., Attention and Performance VI, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 13-14.
[10] Estes, W.K. and Taylor, H.A. (1964) A Detection Method and Probabilistic Model for Assessing Information Processing from Brief Visual Displays. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 52, 446-454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Eriksen, C.W. and Lappin, J.S. (1965) Internal Perceptual System Noise and Redundancy in Simultaneous Inputs in form Identification. Psychonomic Science, 2, 351-352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Gardner, G.T. (1973) Evidence for Independent Parallel Channels in Tachistoscopic Perception. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 130-155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Rumelhart, D.E. (1970) A Multicomponent Theory of the Perception of Briefly Exposed Visual Displays. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 7, 191-218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Atkinson, R.C., Holmgren, J.R. and Juola, J.F. (1969) Processing Time as Influenced by the Number of Elements in a Visual Display. Perception & Psychophysics, 6, 321-326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Kinchla, R.A. (1969) An Attention Operating Characteristic in Vision. McMaster University, Department of Psychology, Hamilton.
[16] Mullin, P.A. and Egeth, H.E. (1989) Capacity Limitations in Visual Word Processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 111-123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Harris, C.R., Pashler, H.E. and Coburn, N. (2004) Moray Revisited: High-Priority Affective Stimuli and Visual Search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 1-31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Scharff, A., Palmer, J. and Moore, C.M. (2011) Extending the Simultaneous-Sequential Paradigm to Measure Perceptual Capacity for Features and Words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 813-833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] White, A.L., Palmer, J. and Boynton, G.M. (2018) Evidence of Serial Processing in Visual Word Recognition. Psychological Science, 29, 1062-1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] White, A.L., Palmer, J., Boynton, G.M. and Yeatman, J.D. (2019) Parallel Spatial Channels Converge at a Bottleneck in Anterior Word-Selective Cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116, 10087-10096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Cai, B. and Brysbaert, M. (2010) SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese Word and Character Frequencies Based on Film Subtitles. PLOS ONE, 5, e10729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Xue, G., Dong, Q., Chen, K., Jin, Z., Chen, C., Zeng, Y. and Reiman, E.M. (2005) Cerebral Asymmetry in Children When Reading Chinese Characters. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 206-214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]