民勤退耕地修复模式选择及生态系统监测研究
Restoration Model Selection and Ecosystem Monitoring of Abandoned Cropland in Minqin
DOI: 10.12677/HJSS.2022.104022, PDF,  被引量    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 王理德, 宋达成*:甘肃治沙研究所,甘肃 兰州;甘肃农业大学林学院,甘肃 兰州;甘肃河西走廊森林生态系统国家定位观测研究站,甘肃 武威;王梓璇, 陈思航, 赵赫然, 吴 昊:甘肃治沙研究所,甘肃 兰州;甘肃河西走廊森林生态系统国家定位观测研究站,甘肃 武威;何洪盛, 李常乐:甘肃农业大学林学院,甘肃 兰州
关键词: 民勤退耕地修复模式监测与评价展望Minqin Abandoned Cropland Restoration Mode Monitoring and Evaluation Outlook
摘要: 本文针对石羊河流域下游生态环境破坏后出现的一系列严重问题展开调查与研究。以沙漠化、盐碱化防治为切入点,以修复和重建民勤绿洲退耕地生态系统为目标,采用生态学和恢复生态学的基本原理,对沙化退耕地和盐碱化退耕地的生物修复模式进行解析,认为人工与自然恢复措施相结合的生态恢复途径是民勤退耕地治理的思路。共总结出5种退耕地修复模式,分别为低密度梭梭林修复模式、沙化退耕地人工柠条林修复技术模式、梭梭接种肉苁蓉模式、柽柳人工造林恢复模式和“黑果枸杞/黄毛头 + 封育”技术模式。结果表明:1) 密度2 m × 8 m梭梭林是沙化退耕地人工植被体系建设的一种理想模式;2) 株距2 m、带宽20 m的柠条林带和灌溉农田组成的模式是农田防护林体系中具有推广前景的模式;3) 现有柠条造林模式中密度2 m × 4 m的柠条林是一种比较理想的生态恢复模式;4) 1 m × 4 m柽柳人工林是盐碱化退耕地植被恢复的理想模式。提出民勤退耕地重建生态系统监测与评价体系,总结出退耕地重建生态系统在绿洲防护系统中地位与作用研究,并提出民勤绿洲退耕地生态治理的思路与对策措施,旨在为石羊河流域生态综合治理提供理论依据和科技支撑。
Abstract: This paper investigates and studies a series of serious problems after the ecological environment destruction in the lower reaches of Shiyang River Basin. With desertification and salinization pre-vention as the entry point, and restoration and reconstruction of the ecological system of the abandoned farmland in Minqin Oasis as the goal, the basic principles of ecology and restoration ecology were adopted to analyze the bioremediation model of the desertified farmland and the salinized farmland. The ecological restoration approach combining artificial and natural restoration measures is the thought of Minqin’s farmland restoration. Five restoration modes were developed, including low-density ammodendron ammodendron forest restoration mode, artificial caragana korshinskii forest restoration technology mode, Haloxylon ammodendron planting cistanche mode, Tamarix ramosissima artificial afforestation restoration mode, and “lycium barbarum/Huangtou + enclosure” technology mode. The results showed as follows: 1) Ammodendron forest with a density of 2 m × 8 m is an ideal model for artificial vegetation system construction in desertified and reclaimed land; 2) The model of caragana korshinskii forest belt with spacing of 2 m and bandwidth of 20 m and irrigated farmland is a promising model in shelterbelt system; 3) The caragana korshinskii forest with a density of 2 m × 4 m is an ideal ecological restoration model; 4) 1 m × 4 m tamarix artificial forest is the ideal model of vegetation restoration in saline-alkali reclaimed land. The ecological monitoring and evaluation system of the reclaimed cultivated land in Minqin was put forward, the status and role of the reclaimed ecological system in the oasis protection system were summarized, and the ecological management ideas and countermeasures of the reclaimed cultivated land in Minqin oasis were put forward. The aim is to provide theoretical basis and scientific support for the comprehensive ecological management of Shiyang River Basin.
文章引用:王理德, 宋达成, 王梓璇, 陈思航, 赵赫然, 吴昊, 何洪盛, 李常乐. 民勤退耕地修复模式选择及生态系统监测研究[J]. 土壤科学, 2022, 10(4): 165-171. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJSS.2022.104022

参考文献

[1] 李真. 干旱内陆河流域生态系统服务空间权衡与协同研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 兰州: 西北师范大学, 2017.
[2] 宋达成, 王理德, 吴昊, 等. 民勤退耕区次生草地土壤特性研究[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(2): 59-68.
[3] 王方琳, 王理德, 韩富贵, 等. 石羊河下游民勤绿洲退耕地植被自然演替特征及物种多样性分析[J]. 西北植物学报, 2013, 33(7): 1459-1464.
[4] 李得禄, 满多清, 刘有军, 等. 石羊河流域下游不同年代退耕地风沙流特征研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(24): 117-122.
[5] 孙涛, 王继和, 刘虎俊, 等. 民勤绿洲生态环境现状及恢复对策[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(7): 245-251.
[6] 何芳兰, 李治元, 赵明, 等. 民勤绿洲盐碱化退耕地植被自然演替及土壤水分垂直变化研究[J]. 中国沙漠, 2010, 30(6): 1374-1380.
[7] 韩福贵, 魏林源, 王理德, 等. 民勤退耕地物种多样性与土壤养分及其相关性分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(6): 109-114.
[8] 孟伟. “十一五”环保科技发展与“十二五”展望[J]. 环境保护, 2011(23): 16-19.
[9] 潘晓燕. 加强民勤生态保护治理的对策建议[J]. 农业科技与信息, 2015(10): 58-59.
[10] 王理德. 石羊河中下游退耕地土壤系统演变规律及其驱动机制研究[Z]. 甘肃省治沙研究所, 2016-03-21.
[11] 赵栋, 任倩. 干旱区绿洲水资源利用初探——以甘肃省民勤县为例[J]. 发展, 2008(3): 35.
[12] 刘晓春, 洪绂增, 纪永福, 等. 民勤北部天然柠条群落结构特征及其优势种群动态研究[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2008, 43(6): 113-118+126.
[13] 赵明, 郭志中, 王耀琳, 等. 不同地下水位植物蒸腾耗水特性研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2003(4): 286-291.
[14] 马怀宁, 崔丽. 荒漠地区造林先锋树种多枝柽柳病虫害防治措施[J]. 中国林副特产, 2009(3): 77.
[15] 柴成武, 赵明, 徐向中, 等. 民勤绿洲沙地系统特征及“退耕”建议[J]. 水土保持研究, 2010, 17(6): 189-193.