关于胎儿利益保护范围的探讨——合理的扩大解释
A Discussion on the Scope of Protection of Fetal Interests—Reasonable Expansion of Interpretation
摘要: 胎儿是依托母体而生的特殊存在状态,有关他的状态与自然人的状态紧密联系,各国都在不同程度上通过立法对胎儿权利给予了相关保护,但关于胎儿保护范围应当扩大还是缩小,学术界还存在不同见解。目前我国关于胎儿利益还停留在《民法典》第16条的相关规定上,而司法实践中却缺少审判依据。本文主要通过分析典型案例,从损害赔偿和征地补偿两方面,对扩大学说给予合理解释,进而为完善胎儿利益保护提出合理建议。
Abstract:
The fetus is a special state of existence dependent on the mother, and its state is closely related to that of a natural person, and all countries have adopt-ed legislation to protect the rights of the fetus to varying degrees, but there are different opinions on whether the scope of fetal protection should be expanded or narrowed. At present, China’s in-terest in the fetus is still limited to the relevant provisions of Article 10.6 of the Civil Code 20 in ju-dicial practice, however, there is no basis for trial. This article mainly analyzes typical cases and gives reasonable explanations for the expanded doctrine in terms of damages and compensation for land acquisition, and then proposes reasonable suggestions for improving the protection of fetal in-terests.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
李敖. 胎儿利益保护范围研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 昆明: 云南大学, 2019: 23.
|
|
[2]
|
赵鑫鑫. 论胎儿利益保护范围——以《民法典》第16条为中心[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南宁: 广西民族大学, 2022: 4.
|
|
[3]
|
拿破仑法典: 法国民法典[M]. 李浩培, 等, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1979: 107, 135.
|
|
[4]
|
王久志, 杨进飞. 民法典中胎儿利益保护范围探讨[J]. 法制博览, 2021(4): 163-164.
|
|
[5]
|
施启阳. 民法总则[Z]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2010.
|
|
[6]
|
杨国强. 论胎儿权益的司法保护——以胎儿的损害赔偿请求权为视角[J]. 产业与科技论坛, 2020(19): 31-33.
|
|
[7]
|
郎嬛琳. 论胎儿人格权益的民法保护[J]. 法学论丛, 2012(6): 77-83.
|
|
[8]
|
谭启平. 民法典第16条的限缩解释——以胎儿不能成为征地补偿对象而展开[J]. 东方法学, 2020(4): 184-195.
|