儒道社会治理思想比较研究
A Comparative Study of Confucian and Taoist Social Governance Thoughts
摘要: 儒道社会治理思想是先哲们在长期实践探索中形成的思想结晶,二者博大精深,源远流长,内容丰富,各自具有独立完备的本体论和方法论体系。在本体论上,二者都强调要遵循自然规律,实现人与自然的和谐统一。在方法论上,二者所主张的治国策略却截然相反,儒家奉行实施“仁政”,“礼法合治”等积极有为的治理观念;道家主张“顺其自然”,“无为而治”等的治国理念。它们相互联系又相互区别,共同构筑了中华民族璀璨的思想文化,其中所蕴藏的优秀的思想成果,在21世纪的中国仍然散发着智慧的光芒。
Abstract:
The social governance thought of Confucianism and Taoism is the crystallization of the ancient philosophers in their long-term practice and exploration. They are broad and profound, have a long history and rich content, and each has an independent and complete ontology and methodology system. In terms of ontology, both of them emphasize the need to follow the laws of nature and realize the harmony and unity between man and nature. In terms of methodology, the strategies advocated by the two are diametrically opposite. Confucianism pursues such positive and promising governance concepts as the implementation of “benevolent government” and “the rule of propriety and law”; Taoism advocates the idea of “letting nature take its course” and “governing by doing nothing”. They are interlinked and different from each other, and together they have built the brilliant ideology and culture of the Chinese nation. The outstanding ideological achievements contained in them still radiate wisdom in China in the 21st century.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
尉迟光斌. 从“恻隐之心”到“天人合一”——儒家道德本体论逻辑演化的唯物史观解析[J]. 中国社会科学院研究生院学报, 2016(3): 17-22.
|
|
[2]
|
范思琦. 新统编版高中历史教科书内容整合研究——以《中外历史纲要(上)》第一单元为例[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2021.
|
|
[3]
|
魏佐国. 先秦道家治国思想的历史透视[J]. 中共南昌市委党校学报, 2010, 8(2): 63-65.
|
|
[4]
|
王丽岩, 译注. 道德经[M]. 北京: 中国文联出版社, 2016.
|
|
[5]
|
王记. “宠辱若惊”: 老子的另类价值观研究[J]. 重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版), 2017(5): 1-2+7.
|
|
[6]
|
徐枫. 汉初政论文研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2019.
|
|
[7]
|
高斌. 中国传统文化中社会治理思想的梳理与启示[J]. 知与行, 2019(3): 65-69.
|
|
[8]
|
何哲. 道与无为: 中华道家的治理思想及对人类治理体系完善的启示[J]. 贵州社会科学, 2021, 381(9): 19-29.
|