融入与拒斥——嵌入式社区养老中心的邻避困境
Integration and Refusal—The Neighborhood Avoidance Dilemma of Embedded Community Elderly Care Centers
DOI: 10.12677/AR.2023.102048, PDF,   
作者: 郝 婕, 阎瑞霞:上海工程技术大学管理学院,上海
关键词: 嵌入式社区养老融入拒斥Embedded Community Elderly Care Integration Refusal
摘要: 人口老龄化是我国当前面临的重要社会问题,社区嵌入式养老是将养老机构引入入驻社区的一种新型养老模式。然而嵌入式养老机构在入驻社区的过程中遇到了一定阻力,引发了一系列邻避冲突问题。本文以浙江省温州市南汇街道社区养老服务中心为例,基于风险感知视角,构建了邻避风险链生成模型,以此来探究邻避效应的演变过程及背后原因,并提出相应的优化策略。通过构建多元共治机制,从政府、运营机构、社区组织、群众多层面多元治理,形成治理合力,力争有效融入。
Abstract: The aging population is an important social problem currently facing China, and community embedded elderly care is a new type of elderly care model that introduces elderly care institutions into the community. However, embedded elderly care institutions encountered certain obstacles in the process of entering the community, leading to a series of neighbor avoidance conflicts. This paper takes the Nanhui Neighborhood Community Elderly Care Service Center in Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province as an example, and based on the perspective of risk perception, constructs a generative model of the avoidance risk chain to explore the evolution process of the avoidance effect and the reasons behind it, and proposes corresponding optimization strategies. By constructing a diversified co-governance mechanism, we aim to form a joint governance force from multiple levels including government, operational agencies, community organizations, and the public, striving for effective integration.
文章引用:郝婕, 阎瑞霞. 融入与拒斥——嵌入式社区养老中心的邻避困境[J]. 老龄化研究, 2023, 10(2): 372-379. https://doi.org/10.12677/AR.2023.102048

参考文献

[1] 关于深入推进医养结合发展的若干意见[EB/OL].
http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-10/26/content_5445271.htm, 2019-10-26.
[2] Bauer, R.A. (1960) Consumer Behavior as Risk Taking. In: Hancock, R.S., Ed., Dynamic Marketing for a Changing World, Proceedings of the 43rd Conference of the American Marketing Association, 389-398.
[3] Slovic, P. (1987) Perception of Risk. Science, 236, 280-285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] 王刚, 宋锴业. 西方环境风险感知: 研究进路、细分论域与学术反思[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2018, 28(8): 169-176.
[5] 王刚, 宋锴业. 环境风险感知的影响因素和作用机理基于核风险感知的混合方法分析[J]. 社会, 2018, 38(4): 212-240.
[6] Kahan, D.M. (2012) Cultural Cognition as a Conception of the Cultural Theory of Risk. In: Roeser, S., Hillerbrand, R., Sandin, P. and Peterson, M., Eds., Handbook of Risk Theory, Springer, Dordrecht, 725-759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Xue, W., Hine, D.W., Loi, N.M., et al. (2014) Cultural Worldviews and Environmental Risk Perceptions: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 249-258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 侯光辉, 王元地. “邻避风险链”: 邻避危机演化的一个风险解释框架[J]. 公共行政评论, 2015, 8(1): 4-28+198.
[9] 王新才, 聂云霞. 信息剩余与信息短缺: 政府信息公开中的悖论解析[J]. 情报科学, 2014, 32(1): 3-7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 杨可荻. 利益相关者视角下社区邻避冲突的成因分析与应对——以社区养老邻避冲突为例[J]. 市场周刊, 2019(8): 189-190.