论信息时代《公共调查法》中的调查权
On Investigative Power in “Public Investigation Act” in Information Age
摘要: 进入信息时代,有关《公共调查法》的讨论中,需要解决的前提性问题是如何理解“调查权”。不同于技术侦查、刑事搜查等相似概念,调查权在主体、客体及行为上有其独特之处。相较于英国《2016调查权力法》对调查权体系的完善构建,国内呈现出立法体系散乱、概念模糊不清的问题,因此有必要对调查权的概念进行界定。通过解析英国调查权制度,评价其优势与劣势,阐释英国调查权制度设计对于解决我国调查权问题的借鉴意义。
Abstract:
In the information age, the discussion on the “Public Investigation Law” has to be addressed as a precursor to the understanding of investigative power. Different from similar concepts such as technical investigation and criminal search, investigative power has its unique features in subject, object and behavior. Compared with the perfect construction of the investigatory power system in the UK’s 2016 Investigatory Powers Act, the domestic legislation system is disorganized and the concept is ambiguous. Therefore, it is necessary to define the concept of investigatory power. By analyzing the system of British investigation power, the advantages and disadvantages of British investigation power are appraising, and the reference of the system design of British investigation power is explained to solve the problem of Chinese investigation power.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
刘鹏. 技术侦查疑难问题研究[J]. 法学杂志, 2017, 38(7): 116-122.
|
|
[2]
|
刘军. 技术侦查的法律控制——以权利保障为视角[J]. 东方法学, 2017(6): 25-34.
|
|
[3]
|
张崇波. 侦查权的法律控制研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 上海: 复旦大学, 2014.
|
|
[4]
|
游鹛. “以审判为中心”视野下侦查监督的完善——以令状制度的本土化重构为中心[J]. 犯罪研究, 2020(2): 92-98.
|
|
[5]
|
王艺. 英国通信数据保存制度探析——以《2016年调查权力法》为中心[J]. 哈尔滨学院学报, 2019, 40(5): 52-56.
|
|
[6]
|
汪栋. 普通法令状与英国司法化国家治理路径的形成[J]. 经贸法律评论, 2020(2): 1-15.
|