论互联网数据抓取行为的反不正当竞争法规制

On the Anti-Unfair Competition Laws and Regulations of Internet Data Scraping

摘要: 随着时代的发展，数据抓取行为已经成为企业获取数据的一个重要的方式，然而，数据抓取行为存在的法律风险往往被忽视。新浪微博诉脉脉案被称为大数据引发的不正当竞争第一案，对于互联网数据抓取行为的反不正当竞争法规制具有重要的参考意义。在司法实践中，针对数据抓取行为，《反不正当竞争法》的适用存在诸多困境，商业秘密条款往往被司法人员忽略，网络条款难以涵盖所有的数据抓取行为范式，一般条款被过度的引用。对此，我们需要明确数据抓取行为不正当性的判断标准，明确具体条款的选择适用规则，明确商业秘密条款与网络条款的适用情形。

Abstract: With the development of the times, data scraping behavior has become an important way for enterprises to obtain data; however, the legal risks of data scraping behavior are often overlooked. The Sina Weibo v. Pulse case is known as the first case of unfair competition caused by big data, and has important reference significance for the anti-unfair competition laws and regulations of Internet data scraping. In judicial practice, there are many difficulties in the application of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law to data scraping, trade secret clauses are often ignored by judicial personnel, online clauses are difficult to cover all paradigms of data scraping behavior, and general clauses are overly quoted. In this regard, we need to clarify the criteria for judging the impropriety of data scraping, clarify the rules for selecting and applying specific clauses, and clarify the application of trade secret clauses and network clauses.