阳明心学与西田哲学的比较——以直观与良知为中心
The Comparison of Yangming’s School of Philosophy and Nishida’s Philosophy—Centered on Intuition and Conscience
摘要: 西田哲学中的“直观”与王阳明的“良知”,二者立论虽未为同源,但也呈现出普遍共通性。“直观”当下呈现,返本归真;“良知”不虑而知,发用流行。两者皆应有其立根落脚处,即直观与良知皆缘起于本心,对人的当下意念发动能够即知即觉。而通过西田几多郎的直观思想对阳明心学之核心概念——“良知”进行会通与哲学诠释,不仅考察了一切知行直观省察中可能达成的道德自觉,亦阐明了阳明心学中的“良知”如何导引向善的价值旨趣之路径及内在逻辑必然性。
Abstract:
Although the intuition in Nishida’s philosophy and Wang Yangming’s conscience are not of the same origin, they reveal a general commonality in their theories. Intuition presents itself in the present and returns to the truth; human beings recognize conscience without thinking, and it generates and operates naturally. Both of them should have their rooting places, that is, both intuition and conscience originate from the original mind, and they are capable of instantly perceiving and knowing the present moment of one’s will. According to the intuitive thought of Nishida Kitaro, which interprets the core concept of Yangming’s philosophy-conscience, we not only examine the moral self-awareness that can be achieved through intuitive inspection of all knowledge and action, but also clarify how the conscience in Yangming’s school of mind can be used to guide the mind. It also elucidates how conscience in Yangming’s philosophy of the mind leads to the value of goodness and its inner logical necessity.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
康德. 答复这个问题: “什么是启蒙运动?” [M]. 何兆武, 译. 上海: 商务印书馆, 1990.
|
|
[2]
|
[日]西田几多郎. 西田几多郎全集, 第二卷[M]. 东京都: 岩波书店, 1978.
|
|
[3]
|
王阳明. 王阳明全集[M]. 吴光, 钱明, 董平, 姚延福, 校. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2012.
|
|
[4]
|
西田几多郎. 善的研究[M]. 何倩, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2011.
|
|
[5]
|
吴光辉. 传统与超越; 日本知识分子的精神轨迹[M]. 北京: 北京中央编译出版社, 2003.
|
|
[6]
|
吴光辉. 哲学视域下的东亚——现代日本哲学思想研究[M]. 厦门: 厦门大学出版社, 2018.
|
|
[7]
|
小坂国继, 胡嘉明. 《善的研究》与阳明学[J]. 阳明学刊, 2015: 179-197+5.
|
|
[8]
|
胡嘉明. 实在与良知——西田哲学与阳明学之比较[J]. 贵州大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 32(5): 44-47.
|
|
[9]
|
牟宗三. 中国哲学的特质[M]. 长春: 吉林出版集团有限责任公司, 2010.
|