人工颈椎间盘与桥型自锁式融合器在治疗单节段颈椎病的研究进展
Progress of Artificial Cervical Intervertebral Disc and Bridge-Type Self-Ligating Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Segment Cervical Spondylosis
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2023.13112472, PDF,   
作者: 木热提·卡哈尔:新疆医科大学研究生学院,新疆 乌鲁木齐 ;王 浩*:新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院骨科中心脊柱二病区,新疆 乌鲁木齐
关键词: 人工颈椎间置换术颈椎前路减压融合术颈椎病手术方法Artificial Cervical Interbody Replacement Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Cervical Spondylosis Surgical Approach
摘要: 颈椎病已经成为临床上常见及多发的疾病,给社会、家庭和患者造成生活上及经济上的危害。由于其病因复杂、病理表现多样、临床症状繁杂、容易复发、严重的甚至需要手术治疗,是骨与关节退行性病变中发病率最高、危害性最大的一种难治性、复杂性疾病。对于存在神经症状的颈椎病患者目前考虑最有效的治疗方案为手术治疗,目前常规手术方式为颈椎前路减压椎间融合手术(anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, ACDF)及人工颈椎椎间盘置换手术(artificial cervical disc replace-ment, ACDR)。但随着微创技术的发展及融合材料及椎间盘假体材料的不断更新,对于两种手术方案的争论一直存在。本综述主要探讨两种不同的植入材料在治疗单节段颈椎病的临床疗效以及研究进展。
Abstract: Cervical spondylosis has become a common and frequent disease in clinical practice, causing life and economic hazards to society, families and patients. Due to its complex etiology, various patho-logical manifestations, complicated clinical symptoms, easy recurrence, and even the need for sur-gical treatment in severe cases, it is an intractable and complex disease with the highest morbidity rate and the greatest harm among the degenerative diseases of bones and joints. For cervical spon-dylosis patients with neurological symptoms, the most effective treatment option is surgery, and the conventional surgical procedures are anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and artifi-cial cervical disc replacement (ACD) and artificial cervical disc replacement (ACDR). However, with the development of minimally invasive techniques and the continuous updating of fusion materials and disc prosthesis materials, there has been an ongoing debate about the two surgical options. This review focuses on the clinical efficacy of two different implant materials in the treatment of single-segment cervical spondylosis and analyzes the variability of cervical sagittal parameters.
文章引用:木热提·卡哈尔, 王浩. 人工颈椎间盘与桥型自锁式融合器在治疗单节段颈椎病的研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(11): 17632-17638. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.13112472

参考文献

[1] 张一龙, 陈仲强, 孙宇, 等. 脊髓型颈椎病患者术后神经功能与生活质量的变化及其之间的相关性分析[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2016, 26(9): 782-790.
[2] Hui, N., Phan, K., Cheng, H., et al. (2020) Complications of Cervical Total Disc Replacement and Their Associations with Heterotopic Ossification: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis. Eu-ropean Spine Journal, 29, 2688-2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 王晶, 杜江, 梁耀中, 等. 显微镜辅助经前路颈椎间盘切除融合术治疗颈椎病37例[J]. 中华显微外科杂志, 2019, 42(3): 241-245.
[4] 韩骁, 田伟, 何达, 等. 人工椎间盘矢状面覆盖比对颈椎人工椎间盘置换术后椎旁骨化的影响[J]. 脊柱外科杂志, 2019, 17(2): 79-83.
[5] Burkus, J.K., Traynelis, V.C., Haid, R.W., et al. (2014) Clinical and Radiographic Analysis of an Artificial Cervical Disc: 7-Year Fol-low-Up from the Prestige Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial: Clinical Article. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 21, 516-528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Skovrlj, B., Lee, D.H., Caridi, J.M., et al. (2015) Reoperations Following Cervical Disc Replacement. Asian Spine Journal, 9, 471-482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Okada, E., Matsumoto, M., Ichihara, D., et al. (2010) Anterior Cer-vical Decompression and Fusion Accelerates Adjacent Segment Degeneration: Comparison with Asymptomatic Volun-teers in a Ten-Year Magnetic Resonance Imaging Follow-Up Study. Spine, 35, 36-43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Chen, Y., Chen, H., Cao, P., et al. (2015) Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion with the Zero-P Spacer: Mid-Term Results of Two-Level Fusion. European Spine Journal, 24, 1666-1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] 韦辉贤. 人工颈椎间盘置换术的研究进展[J]. 中国医疗前沿, 2013, 6(13): 1809-1811.
[10] 蒲婷, 原芳, 廖振华, 等. 人工颈椎间结构材料及体外生物力学的研究进展[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2013, 17(26): 4888-4895.
[11] Skeppholm, M., Henriques, T., Tullberg, T., et al. (2017) Higher Reoperation Rate Following Cervical Disc Replacement in a Retrospective, Long-Term Comparative Study of 715 Patients. European Spine Journal, 26, 2434-2440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Lu, V.M., Mobbs, R.J. and Phan, K. (2019) Clinical Outcomes of Treating Cervical Adjacent Segment Disease by Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion versus Total Disc Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Global Spine Journal, 9, 559-567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Grasso, G., Giambartino, F., Tomasello, G., et al. (2014) Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with ROI-C Peek Cage: Cervical Alignment and Patient Outcomes. European Spine Journal, 23, 650-657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Bucci, M.N., Oh, D., Cowan, R.S., et al. (2017) The ROI-C Ze-ro-Profile Anchored Spacer for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Biomechanical Profile and Clinical Outcomes. Medical Devices (Auckl), 10, 61-69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Xu, S., Liang, Y., Zhu, Z., et al. (2018) Adjacent Segment Degenera-tion or Disease after Cervical Total Disc Replacement: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 13, Article No. 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Chien, A., Lai, D.M., Wang, S.F., et al. (2016) Comparison of Cervical Kinematics, Pain and Functional Disability between Single- and Two-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Spine, 41, E915-E922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Dong, L., Tan, M.S., Yan, Q.H., et al. (2015) Footprint Mismatch of Cervical Disc Prostheses with Chinese Cervical Anatomic Dimensions. Chinese Medical Journal (England), 128, 197-202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Elsawaf, A., Mastronardi, L., Roperto, R., et al. (2009) Effect of Cervical Dynamics on Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Anterior Cervical Fusion with Cages. Neu-rosurgical Review, 32, 215-224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Hisey, M.S., Zigler, J.E., Jackson, R., et al. (2016) Prospective, Randomized Comparison of One-Level Mobi-C Cervical Total Disc Replacement vs. Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Results at 5-Year Follow-Up. International Journal of Spine Surgery, 10, 86-89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Delamarter, R.B. and Zigler, J. (2013) Five-Year Reoperation Rates, Cervical Total Disc Replacement versus Fusion, Results of a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 38, 711-717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Quan, G.M., Vital, J.M., Hansen, S., et al. (2011) Eight-Year Clinical and Radiological Follow-Up of the Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 36, 639-646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Jackson, R.J., Davis, R.J., Hoffman, G.A., et al. (2016) Subsequent Surgery Rates after Cervical Total Disc Replacement Using a Mobi-C Cervical Disc Prosthesis versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with 5-Year Follow-Up. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 24, 734-745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Davis, R.J., Nunley, P.D., Kim, K.D., et al. (2015) Two-Level Total Disc Replacement with Mobi-C Cervical Artificial Disc versus Anterior Discectomy and Fusion: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Clinical Trial with 4-Year Follow-Up Results. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 22, 15-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Perrini, P., Cagnazzo, F., Benedetto, N., et al. (2017) Cage with Anterior Plating Is Advantageous over the Stand-Alone Cage for Segmental Lordosis in the Treatment of Two-Level Cervical Degenerative Spondylopathy: A Retrospective Study. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 163, 27-32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] 刘伟聪, 陈雄生, 周盛源, 等. 颈人工椎间盘置换治疗单节段颈椎病的中期随访研究[J]. 脊柱外科杂志, 2017, 15(2): 65-70.
[26] Lee, S.E., Jahng, T.A. and Kim, H.J. (2015) Correlation between Cervical Lordosis and Adjacent Segment Pathology after Anterior Cervical Spinal Surgery. European Spine Journal, 24, 2899-2909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] 王俊波, 王文军, 刘进才, 等. 人工椎间盘置换术治疗颈椎病的中远期临床疗效及影像学评价[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2013, 21(9): 868-873.
[28] 李淳德, 孙浩林, 刘宪义, 等. 前路减压多节段椎间融合器植骨融合治疗颈椎退变性疾患的临床观察[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2008, 18(1): 18-23.
[29] 赵寅, 周盛源, 孙延卿, 等. 椎间盘Pfirrmann退变评分对人工颈椎间盘置换术后异位骨化量化的价值[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2020, 40(18): 1245-1254.
[30] Ganbat, D., Kim, Y.H., Kim, K., et al. (2016) Effect of Mechan-ical Loading on Heterotopic Ossification in Cervical Total Disc Replacement: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Anal-ysis. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, 15, 1191-1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Meisel, H.J., Jurák, L., Antinheimo, J., et al. (2016) Four-Year Results of a Prospective Single-Arm Study on 200 Semiconstrained Total Cervical Disc Prostheses: Clinical and Radio-graphic Outcome. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 5, 556-565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Rumalla, K., Smith, K.A. and Arnold, P.M. (2018) Cervical Total Disc Replacement and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Reoperation Rates, Complications, and Hospital Re-source Utilization in 72 688 Patients in the United States. Neurosurgery, 82, 441-453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] 赵衍斌, 周非非, 孙宇, 等. Bryan颈椎人工椎间盘置换术后10年随访结果[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2019, 29(2): 97-102.
[34] Wahood, W., Yolcu, Y.U., Kerezoudis, P., et al. (2020) Artificial Discs in Cervical Disc Replacement: A Meta-Analysis for Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes. World Neu-rosurgery, 134, 598-613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]