碳排放数据造假环境公益诉讼规制路径探析
Environmental Public Interest Litigation: The Regulatory Path of Falsifying Carbon Emission Report Data
摘要: 对近年来有关案件的收集梳理显示,目前碳排放报告数据造假问题的治理上还存在立法缺位、治理手段单一、责任体系不清晰等问题。建构碳排放数据造假的环境公益诉讼机制对弥补该领域立法、执法上的不足和完善责任承担体系具有重要意义。需尽快完善环境民事行政公益诉讼并轨的规范路径以保护公共环境利益、激活政府监管职能,为我国气候目标的实现提供助力。
Abstract:
The collection and analyzing of relevant cases in recent years shows that there are still problems in the governance of carbon emission report data such as lack of legislation, single governance methods, and unclear responsibility systems. The construction of an environmental public interest litigation mechanism for carbon emission data falsification is of great significance to make up for the shortcomings of legislation and law enforcement in this field and improve the liability system. It is necessary to develop the parallel path of environmental civil and administrative public interest litigation as soon as possible to protect public environmental interests and activate government regulatory functions, so as to provide assistance for the realization of China’s climate goals.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
中华人民共和国生态环境部. 全国碳排放权交易市场第一个履约周期报告[R]. 2022.
|
|
[2]
|
唐伟珉. 全国碳市场核查体系存在的问题分析及相关建议[J]. 可持续发展经济导刊, 2022(5): 46-49.
|
|
[3]
|
田丹宇, 徐婷. 论应对气候变化信息公开制度[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2020(5): 70-82+206.
|
|
[4]
|
丁一汇, 李巧萍, 柳艳菊, 等. 空气污染与气候变化[J]. 气象, 2009, 35(3): 3-14.
|
|
[5]
|
陈国强, 殷音. 碳排放数据造假, 各方主体都承担什么法律责任? [J]. 环境经济, 2022(5): 58-63.
|
|
[6]
|
张辉. 论环境民事公益诉讼的责任承担方式[J]. 法学论坛, 2014, 29(6): 58-67.
|
|
[7]
|
龙迪, 范丹婷, Huw Slater, 等. 碳排放数据质量问题及提升建议[J]. 环境保护, 2022, 50(12): 54-56.
|