浅论我国刑事诉讼法之管辖权异议制度的构建

A Brief Discussion on the Construction of Jurisdictional Objection System of China’s Criminal Procedure Law

摘要: 国现行刑事诉讼法并未对管辖权异议制度作出明确规定，实践中常有发生的错误管辖、管辖冲突等问题也就没有解决的依据可循。刑事诉讼中的管辖问题不仅只是司法机关内部的分工问题，其还与被告人、自诉人的合法权益、社会公共利益、司法公正、程序正义等紧密关联，因此，从法律规定层面构建起完善的管辖权异议制度具有现实需要性。本文将在前学者的研究基础上，参考域外相关先进立法，对此问题展开论析，尝试构建管辖权异议之诉制度，并对其适用范围、提起时限和审查时限、证明责任和证明标准以及处理规则等方面给出规范建议，以求对我国管辖权异议制度的构建献出薄力，最终目的为促进实体正义与程序正义相结合，也为被告人提供其应当享有的人权利益保障。

Abstract: China’s current Criminal Procedure Law does not make clear provisions for the system of jurisdictional objections, and there is no basis for resolving the problems of erroneous jurisdiction and jurisdictional conflicts that often occur in practice. Jurisdiction in criminal proceedings is not only a division of labor within the judiciary, but also closely related to the legitimate rights and interests of the defendant and the private prosecutor, social public interest, judicial fairness, procedural justice, etc. Therefore, it is a practical need to build up a perfect system of jurisdictional objections at the level of the legal provisions. This paper will be based on the research of former scholars, reference to the relevant advanced extraterritorial legislation, to analyze this issue, try to build the system of jurisdictional objections, and its scope of application, the time limit for filing and review of the time limit, the burden of proof and standards of proof and the processing of the rules and so on give normative recommendations, in order to contribute to the construction of China’s jurisdictional objections to the construction of the system, with the ultimate goal of promoting the combination of substantive and procedural justice, and also to provide the defendant with the legal rights and interests of his own. The ultimate goal is to promote the combination of substantive justice and procedural justice, and also to provide the defendants with the human rights and interests that they should enjoy.