污染环境罪司法适用问题及其进路
Judicial Application of Environmental Pollution Crime and Its Approach
摘要: 环境污染问题关乎人类生存发展,目前世界各国对环境保护问题愈发重视,惩治和预防环境犯罪的法律制度逐渐完善。我国行政法规、刑法规范均对污染环境问题进行规制。刑法是打击污染环境行为最严厉的手段,经历多次修改之后,污染环境罪逐渐建立并完善。然而,在司法实践中污染环境案件情节复杂、行为定性困难等导致污染环境罪的适用矛盾和争议问题日益加剧,主要体现为该罪的保护法益、行为构造、罪过形式的适用标准不一,出现同案异罚,刑罚效果不佳。因此,需要解决污染环境罪在司法适用过程中的争议问题,明确污染环境罪保护法益是生态学的人类中心法益,认定该罪的行为构造为情节犯、主观上采用故意说才能有利于打击犯罪,有效保护生态环境,发挥刑法对污染环境行为的规制功能。
Abstract:
The problem of environmental pollution is related to the survival and development of human beings. At present, countries all over the world pay more and more attention to environmental protection, and the legal system of punishing and preventing environmental crimes is gradually improving. China’s administrative regulations and criminal law norms regulate environmental pollution. The criminal law is the most severe means to crack down on environmental pollution. After many amendments, the crime of environmental pollution is gradually established and perfected. However, in the judicial practice, the complexity of the case and the difficulty in the characterization of the behavior lead to the increasing contradiction and controversy in the application of the crime of environmental pollution, which is mainly reflected in the different application standards of the protection law, the structure of the behavior and the form of the crime, resulting in different penalties for the same case and poor penalty effect. Therefore, it is necessary to solve the dispute of environmental pollution crime, in order to clarify that the protection law of environmental pollution crime is the human-centered legal interest of ecology, and to recognize the crime as a circumstance crime and adopt the intentional theory is more conducive to cracking down on crime and playing the regulation function of criminal law on environmental pollution behavior.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
严厚福. 污染环境罪: 结果犯还是行为犯——以2015年1322份“污染环境罪”一审判决书为参照[J]. 中国地质大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 17(4): 56-65.
|
|
[2]
|
陈洪兵. 解释论视野下的污染环境罪[J]. 政治与法律, 2015(7): 25-37.
|
|
[3]
|
张明楷. 污染环境罪的争议问题[J]. 法学评论, 2018, 36(2): 1-19.
|
|
[4]
|
喻海松. 环境资源犯罪实务精释[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2017.
|
|
[5]
|
秦鹏, 李国庆. 论污染环境罪主观面的修正构成解释和适用——兼评2013“两高”对污染环境罪的司法解释[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 22(2): 152-159.
|
|
[6]
|
高铭暄, 马克昌. 刑法学[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2017.
|
|
[7]
|
王勇. 论司法解释中的“严重污染环境”——以2016年《环境污染刑事解释》为展开[J]. 法学杂志, 2018, 39(9): 106- 113.
|
|
[8]
|
李永升, 袁汉兴. 污染环境罪的司法困境与出路——以生态和人类双重法益为中心[J]. 湖北社会科学, 2021(1): 141-151.
|
|
[9]
|
潘佳. 污染环境罪保护法益之反思[J]. 新疆社会科学, 2022(5): 103-110.
|
|
[10]
|
郭伟伟. 累积犯视域下污染环境罪的司法适用研究[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2023(4): 177-185.
|
|
[11]
|
樊建民. 污染环境罪司法适用的困境及其破解[J]. 法商研究, 2022, 39(3): 157-170.
|
|
[12]
|
徐海东. 污染环境罪司法适用问题研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南政法大学, 2021.
|