|
[1]
|
Borghesi, S. and Zhu, T. (2018) Getting Married (and Divorced): A Critical Review of the Literature on (De) Linking Emissions Trading Schemes. Strategic Behavior and the Environment, 8, 219-267.
|
|
[2]
|
International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP) (2018) A Guide to Linking Emission Trading Systems. Berlin.
|
|
[3]
|
Mehling, M.A. (2010) Bridging the Transatlantic Divide: Legal Aspects of a Link between Regional Carbon Markets in Europe and the United States. Sustainable Development Law and Policy, 7, 46-51.
|
|
[4]
|
Bruvoll, A. and Dalen, H.M. (2009) Pricing of CO2 Emissions in Norway. Statistics Norway/Climate and Energy Economics.
|
|
[5]
|
Mace, M.J. and Anderson, J. (2009) Legal and De-sign Issues Arising in Linking the EU ETS with Existing and Emerging Emissions Trading Schemes. Journal for Euro-pean Environmental & Planning Law, 6, 226-228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[6]
|
International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP) (2020) Emissions Trading Worldwide, Status Report 2020. Berlin.
|
|
[7]
|
German Emissions Trading Authority (2015) Design-ing Institutions, Structures and Mechanisms to Facilitate the Linking of Emissions Trading. Berlin, 7-12.
|
|
[8]
|
Flachsland, C., Marschinski, R. and Edenhofer, O. (2009) To Link or Not to Link: Benefits and Disadvantages of Linking Cap-and-Trade Systems. Climate Policy, 9, 358-372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[9]
|
Fell, H., Moore, E. and Morgenstern, R.D. (2011) Cost Containment under Cap and Trade: A Review of the Literature. International Re-view of Environmental and Resource Economics, 5, 285-307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[10]
|
Pezzey, J. and Jotzo, F. (2012) Tax-versus-Trading and Efficient Revenue Recycling as Issues for Greenhouse Gas Abatement. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2, 230-236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[11]
|
International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP) (2022) Emissions Trading Worldwide: Status Report 2022. Berlin.
|
|
[12]
|
Füssler, J. and Herren, M. (2015) Design Options for an Interna-tional Carbon Asset Reserve for the World. World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[13]
|
Morehouse, E. (2017) Western Climate Initiative Expands: Ontario to Join California-Québec Carbon Market. EDF Talks Global Cli-mate.
|
|
[14]
|
Vöhringer, F. (2012) Linking the Swiss Emissions Trading System with the EU ETS: Economic Effects of Regulatory Design Alternatives. Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics, 148, 167-196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[15]
|
孙静. 海南国际碳排放权交易中心成立[EB/OL].
https://www.cpnn.com.cn/news/dfny/202207/t20220729_1538422_wap.html, 2023-02-15.
|
|
[16]
|
Bohringer, C., Dijkstra, B. and Rosendahl, K.E. (2014) Sectoral and Regional Expansion of Emissions Trading. Resource and Energy Economics, 37, 201-225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[17]
|
Li, M.Y., Weng, Y.Y. and Duan, M.S. (2019) Emissions, Energy and Economic Impacts of Linking China’s National ETS with the EU ETS. Applied Energy, 235, 1235-1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[18]
|
Gilde, L., Victoria, G.A. and Greiner, S. (2022) Article 6 Transaction Structures. World Bank. Climate Focus, 4-5.
|
|
[19]
|
Lazarus, M., Schneider, L., Lee, C. and van As-selt, H. (2015) Options and Issues for Restricted Linking of Emissions Trading Systems. International Carbon Action Partnership.
|
|
[20]
|
Quemin, S. and de Perthuis, C. (2019) Transitional Restricted Linkage between Emissions Trading Schemes. Environmental and Resource Economics, 74, 1-32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[21]
|
Schneider, L., Lazarus, M., Lee, C. and van Asselt, H. (2017) Restricted Linking of Emissions Trading Systems: Options, Benefits, and Challenges. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17, 883-898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[22]
|
魏庆坡. 碳交易市场跨国合作法律问题研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 对外经济贸易大学, 2016.
|
|
[23]
|
Pizer, W.A. and Yates, A.J. (2015) Terminating Links between Emission Trading Programs. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 71, 142-159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|