高中数学人教版《文献阅读与数学写作》与沪教版《阅读材料》比较研究
A Comparative Study of “Literature Reading and Mathematics Writing” Published by the People’s Education Press for High School Mathematics and “Reading Materials” Published by the Shanghai Education Press
摘要: 高中数学是培养青少年数学素养与数学思维的重要阶段,人教版与沪教版数学教材作为使用广泛的高中教学材料,其内容设置差异对学生提出不同要求。数学阅读能力是新课标提出的全新数学能力,在两版教材中均有体现,如何根据地区学生的情况差异,选择合适教材教学,对整体数学教育品质发挥着关键性作用。
Abstract: High school mathematics is an important stage for cultivating young people’s mathematical literacy and mathematical thinking. As the widely used high school teaching materials, the mathematics textbooks of the People’s Education Press and the Shanghai Education Press put different requirements on students due to differences in their content settings. Mathematics reading ability is a brand-new mathematical ability proposed by the new curriculum standards, which is reflected in both editions of textbooks. How to choose appropriate teaching materials according to the differences in the situation of regional students plays a key role in the overall quality of mathematics education.
文章引用:苏碧·安尼尔. 高中数学人教版《文献阅读与数学写作》与沪教版《阅读材料》比较研究[J]. 职业教育发展, 2024, 13(2): 543-548. https://doi.org/10.12677/ve.2024.132089

参考文献

[1] 王尚志, 吕世虎, 张思明. 理解《普通高中数学课程标准(2017年版)》的八个关键问题[J]. 人民教育, 2018(9): 54-55.
[2] Pugalee, D.K. (1997) Connecting Writing to the Mathematics Curriculum. Mathematics Teacher, 90, 308-310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Cicconi, M. (2014) Vygotsky Meets Technology: A Reinvention of Collaboration in the Early Childhood Mathematics Classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 42, 57-65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Nahrgang, C.L. and Petersen, B.T. (1986) Using Writing to Lear Mathematics. Mathematics Teacher, 79, 461-465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Miller, L.D. (1991) Writing to Learn Mathematics. Mathematics Teacher, 84, 516-521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 仓万林, 李红. 让学生学会“数学表达”——“数学写作指导1”教学设计及思考[J]. 江苏教育, 2017(83): 35-36, 49.
[7] 刘雅芳, 邱云. 高中数学阅读与写作教学的实践与思考——以“对数概念的形成与发展”为例[J]. 中国数学教育, 2022(3): 23-26.
[8] 方兴发, 曹谦, 汪霞. 核心素养视域下人教A版(2019)与沪教版(2020)高中数学教材对比分析——以三角函数为例[J]. 创新教育研究, 2023(11): 1846.
[9] 杨璐, 严加红. 中英学术性高中建设与发展的比较研究[J]. 中小学校长, 2015(6): 69-70.
[10] 中华人民共和国教育部. 中华人民共和国教育部普通高中数学课程标准(2017年版) [M]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2018.