成人认知加工语言对学前儿童元认知的影响
The Influence of Adult Cognitive Processing Language on Preschool Children’s Metacognition
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2024.144231, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 曹玉洁, 夏冰怡, 焦小燕*：江苏师范大学教育科学学院，江苏 徐州
关键词: 认知加工语言；元认知；学前儿童；Cognitive Processing Language； Metacognition； Preschool Children
摘要: 元认知是以自身认知活动为对象的较高层次的认知活动，学前儿童已表现出一定的元认知能力。认知加工语言是一种涉及元认知问题、有意记忆和策略选择的教学语言，成人的认知加工语言会影响儿童元认知的发展。本文将从认知加工语言的五维度结构探讨其影响幼儿元认知发展的机制，为开展符合幼儿发展水平的元认知教学提供应用指导。
Abstract: Metacognition is a higher-level cognitive activity with its own cognitive activities as the object. Preschool children have shown certain metacognitive ability. Cognitive processing language is a kind of teaching language involving metacognitive problems, intentional memory and strategy selection. Adult cognitive processing language can affect the development of children’s metacognition. This paper will explore the mechanism of its influence on children’s metacognitive development from the five-dimensional structure of cognitive processing language, aiming to provide application guidance for metacognitive teaching in line with children’s development level.
文章引用：曹玉洁, 夏冰怡, 焦小燕 (2024). 成人认知加工语言对学前儿童元认知的影响. 心理学进展, 14(4), 374-378. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2024.144231

参考文献

[1] 陈晨(2023). “元认知游戏循环圈”课程提升5-6岁幼儿元认知的实践研究. 硕士学位论文, 杭州: 杭州师范大学.
[2] 陈英和, 王雨晴, 肖兴荣(2006). 3~5岁幼儿元认知监控发展特点的研究. 心理与行为研究, 4(1), 5-8, 17.
[3] 洪德厚(1984). 3-14岁儿童记忆发展的某些特点. 心理科学通讯, (2), 20-22, 44, 67.
[4] 李伟(2021). 英国元认知教学实效性的研究及其启示. 当代教育科学, (8), 55-61.
[5] 张新凤(2023). 基于记忆策略的绘本教学对幼儿记忆品质的培养研究. 硕士学位论文, 黄石: 湖北师范大学.
[6] Ashcraft, M. H. (1982). The Development of Mental Arithmetic: A Chronometric Approach. Developmental Review, 2, 213-236.[CrossRef] 
[7] Baroody, A. J., & Ginsburg, H. P. (2013). The Relationship between Initial Meaningful and Mechanical Knowledge of Arithmetic. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge (pp. 75-112). Routledge.
[8] Bryce, D., & Whitebread, D. (2012). The Development of Metacognitive Skills: Evidence from Observational Analysis of Young Children’s Behavior during Problem-Solving. Metacognition and Learning, 7, 197-217.[CrossRef] 
[9] Chatzipanteli, A., Grammatikopoulos, V., & Gregoriadis, A. (2014). Development and Evaluation of Metacognition in Early Childhood Education. Early Child Development and Care, 184, 1223-1232.[CrossRef] 
[10] Coffman, J. L., Ornstein, P. A., McCall, L. E., & Curran, P. J. (2008). Linking Teachers’ Memory-Relevant Language and the Development of Children’s Memory Skills. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1640-1654.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Coltman, P. (2006). Talk of a Number: Self-Regulated Use of Mathematical Metalanguage by Children in the Foundation Stage. Early Years, 26, 31-48.[CrossRef] 
[12] Ebert, S. (2011). Was Kinder über die mentale Welt wissen : Dieentwicklung von deklarativem metagedächtnisaus der Sicht der “Theory of Mind”. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Bamberg.
[13] Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive Aspects of Problem Solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The Nature of Intelligence (pp. 231-235). Lawrence Erlbaum.
[14] Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.[CrossRef] 
[15] Garofalo, J., & Lester, F. K. (1985). Metacognition, Cognitive Monitoring, and Mathematical Performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16, 163-176.[CrossRef] 
[16] Gillies, R. (2003). The Behaviours, Interactions, and Perceptions of Junior High School Students during Small-Group Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 137-147.[CrossRef] 
[17] Grammer, J. K., Coffman, J. L., Sidney, P. G., & Ornstein, P. A. (2016). Linking Teacher Instruction and Student Achievement in Mathematics: The Role of Teacher Language. Journal of Cognition and Development, 17, 468-485.[CrossRef] 
[18] Hudson, K. N., Coffman, J. L., & Ornstein, P. A. (2018). Addition in Kindergarten: The Role of Mothers’ and Teachers’ Language. Journal of Cognition and Development, 19, 65-86.[CrossRef] 
[19] Jacobs, G. M. (2004). A Classroom Investigation of the Growth of Metacognitive Awareness in Kindergarten Children through the Writing Process. Early Childhood Education Journal, 32, 17-23.[CrossRef] 
[20] King, A. (1999). Discourse Patterns for Mediating Peer Learning. In A. O’Donnell, & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning (pp. 87-116). Erlbaum.
[21] Lyons, K. E., & Ghetti, S. (2011). The Development of Uncertainty Monitoring in Early Childhood. Child Development, 82, 1778-1787.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Moely, B. E., Hart, S. S., Leal, L., Santulli, K. A., Rao, N., Johnson, T., & Hamilton, L. B. (1992). The Teacher’s Role in Facilitating Memory and Study Strategy Development in the Elementary School Classroom. Child Development, 63, 653-672.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] O’Leary, A. P., & Sloutsky, V. M. (2016). Carving Metacognition at Its Joints: Protracted Development of Component Processes. Child Development, 88, 1015-1032.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Reder, L. M., & Schunn, C. D. (1996). Metacognition Does Not Imply Awareness: Strategy Choice Is Governed by Implicit Learning and Memory. In L. M. Reder (Ed.), Implicit Memory and Metacognition (pp. 45-76). Frlhaum.
[25] Robson, S. (2010). Self-Regulation and Metacognition in Young Children’s Self-Initiated Play and Reflective Dialogue. International Journal of Early Years Education, 18, 227-241.[CrossRef] 
[26] Siegler, R. S., & Jenkins, E. A. (1989). How Children Discover New Strategies. Erlbaum.
[27] Siegler, R. S., Adolph, K. E., & Lemaire, P. (1996). Strategy Choices across the Lifespan. In L. Reder (Ed.), Implicit Memory and Metacognition (pp. 79-121). Erlbaum.