留守儿童社交焦虑对抑郁的影响:一项横断研究
The Impact of Social Anxiety on Depression in Left-Behind Children: A Cross-Sectional Study
摘要: 本研究探讨了社交焦虑对留守儿童抑郁的影响机制,并验证了负性情绪信息注意偏向在其中的中介作用以及社会支持的调节作用。具体而言,研究结果表明社交焦虑不仅能直接正向预测留守儿童的抑郁,而且通过负性情绪信息注意偏向间接影响留守儿童的抑郁。此外,研究还发现,留守儿童的社会支持在社交焦虑与抑郁关系中起到调节作用,尤其是当社交焦虑水平较高时,社会支持对抑郁的缓解作用更加明显。因此,本研究不仅揭示了社交焦虑影响留守儿童抑郁的机制,还为社会支持干预提供了实证依据。
Abstract: This study explored the mechanism by which social anxiety affects depression in left-behind children and verified the mediating role of negative emotional information attention bias and the regulatory role of social support. Specifically, the results indicate that social anxiety can not only directly predict depression in left-behind children but also indirectly affect their depression through negative emotional information attention bias. Furthermore, the study found that social support for left-behind children plays a regulatory role in the relationship between social anxiety and depression; especially when social anxiety levels are high, the mitigating effect of social support on depression becomes more evident. Therefore, this study not only reveals the mechanism by which social anxiety affects depression in left-behind children but also provides empirical evidence for social support interventions.
文章引用:倪洁, 陈林 (2024). 留守儿童社交焦虑对抑郁的影响:一项横断研究. 心理学进展, 14(6), 587-594. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2024.146443

参考文献

[1] 宫宇轩(1994). 社会支持与健康的关系研究概述. 心理学动态, (2), 34-39.
[2] 侯娟, 朱英格, 方晓义(2021). 手机成瘾与抑郁: 社交焦虑和负性情绪信息注意偏向的多重中介作用. 心理学报, 53(4), 362-373.
[3] 胡阳, 范翠英, 张凤娟, 谢笑春, 郝恩河(2014). 青少年网络受欺负与抑郁: 压力感与网络社会支持的作用. 心理发展与教育, 30(2), 177-184.
[4] 姜乾金(2001). 领悟社会支持量表. 行为医学科学, 10(10), 41-43.
[5] 上官子木(1993). 隔代抚养与“留守”儿童. 父母必读, (11), 16-17.
[6] 施永谋, 罗跃嘉(2016). 大学生对婴儿面孔的注意偏向特点. 中国心理卫生杂志, 30(5), 378-383.
[7] 宋素涛, 李爽, 赵诗梦, 等(2023). 社交焦虑者对面孔表情存在持续性注意偏向: 来自N2pc的证据. 中国临床心理学, 31(2), 267-273.[CrossRef
[8] 唐继亮, 宣宾(2012). 等值正负评价对高低社交焦虑“同图寻异”任务的影响. 见 编者信息, 中国心理学会.第十五届全国心理学学术会议论文摘要集.
[9] 汪向东, 王希林, 马弘(1999). 心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版). 中国心理卫生杂志出版社.
[10] 王东宇(2006). 留守儿童的心理健康教育问题探析. 见 中国教育学会教育统计与测量分会, 中国心理学会心理测量专业委员会(编), 全国教育与心理统计测量学术年会论文摘要集.
[11] 王妍, 罗跃嘉(2005). 大学生面孔表情材料的标准化及其评定. 中国临床心理学, 13(4), 396-398.
[12] 毋嫘, 林冰心(2016). 高特质焦虑个体对负性情绪信息注意偏向的机制探讨. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(6), 992-995, 1028.
[13] 吴晓薇, 黄玲, 何晓琴, 唐海波, 蒲唯丹(2015). 大学生社交焦虑与攻击、抑郁: 情绪调节自我效能感的中介作用. 国临床心理学杂志, 23(5), 804-807.
[14] 武琦(2012). 非焦虑个体的负性情绪表情注意偏向的点探测研究. 硕士学位论文, 苏州: 苏州大学.
[15] 元帅, 杜爱玲, 杨世昌, 王新友, 申丽娟(2015). 国内留守儿童心理弹性Meta分析. 中国健康心理学杂志, 23(5), 764-768.
[16] 章婕, 吴振云, 方格, 李娟, 韩布新, 陈祉妍(2010). 流调中心抑郁量表全国城市常模的建立. 中国心理卫生杂志, 24(2), 139-143.
[17] 赵景欣, 刘霞, 张文新(2013). 同伴拒绝、同伴接纳与农村留守儿童的心理适应: 亲子亲合与逆境信念的作用. 心理学, 45(7), 797-810.
[18] Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, Social Support, and the Buffering Hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357.[CrossRef
[19] Cullen, F. T. (1994). Social Support as an Organizing Concept for Criminology: Presidential Address to the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences. Justice Quarterly, 11, 527-559.[CrossRef
[20] Heimberg, R. G., Brozovich, F. A., & Rapee, R. M. (2010). A Cognitive Behavioral Model of Social Anxiety Disorder: Update and Extension. Academic Press.
[21] Ingram, R. E., Ramel, W., Chavira, D. et al. (2005). Social Anxiety and Depression. Department of Psychology.
[22] Jacobson, N. C., & Newman, M. G. (2014). Avoidance Mediates the Relationship between Anxiety and Depression over a Decade Later. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 28, 437-445.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Leary, M. R. (1983). Social Anxiousness: The Construct and Its Measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 47, 66-75.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Radloff, L.S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401.[CrossRef
[25] Zhang, X., Li, M., Guo, L., & Zhu, Y. (2019). Mental Health and Its Influencing Factors among Left-Behind Children in South China: A Cross-Sectional Study. BMC Public Health, 19, Article No. 1725.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 30-41.[CrossRef