算法推荐模式下网络服务提供者的版权侵权研究
Research on Copyright Infringement of Network Service Providers under Algorithmic Recommendation Model
摘要: 我国网络服务提供者在较长的一段时间内,作为中立的平台对其平台上存在的侵权作品承担着比较低但也较为合适的责任。而平台之所以承担此种较低的责任正是因为其不直接参与侵权,始终保持在一个中立的位置。然而,算法的出现和发展打破了这一局面,算法推荐的模式愈发成熟,其对用户行为的介入程度也逐步加深,且相较于以往更加具备隐蔽性和专业性,技术似乎已经不再那么中立,版权者在这场权益争夺战中逐渐落入下风。另外,在司法实践中,因为算法的存在,也出现了对网络服务提供者责任认定的分歧,注意义务的适用比较混乱,事后保护的模式也稍显乏力。要在算法时代维持网络服务提供者与版权者的利益平衡就有必要考察不同类型的推荐模式,以及不同平台的抗风险能力,在此基础上明确注意义务的适用层次,也要进一步地加强针对平台上版权侵权的事前保护。
Abstract: For a long time, Chinese internet service providers have been bearing relatively low but appropriate liability as neutral platforms for copyright infringement on their platforms. The reason why platforms bear such lower liability is that they do not directly engage in copyright infringement and always maintain a neutral position. However, the emergence and development of algorithms have changed this situation. The algorithm recommendation model is becoming more and more mature, and its intervention in user behavior is gradually deepening. Compared to the past, it is more hidden and professional, and technology seems to no longer be neutral. Copyright holders are gradually falling into disadvantage in this rights struggle. In addition, in judicial practice, because of the existence of algorithms, there are also disputes on the liability of internet service providers. The application of due diligence is relatively chaotic, and the post-event protection model is somewhat ineffective. In order to maintain a balance between the interests of network service providers and copyright owners in the era of algorithms, it is necessary to examine different types of recommendation models and the anti-risk capabilities of different platforms, and on this basis, clarify the application level of the duty of care, and further strengthen the prior protection against copyright infringement on the platform.
文章引用:范宇轩. 算法推荐模式下网络服务提供者的版权侵权研究[J]. 法学, 2024, 12(11): 6345-6351. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2024.1211900

参考文献

[1] 刘华玲, 马俊, 张国祥. 基于深度学习的内容推荐算法研究综述[J]. 计算机工程, 2021, 47(7): 1-12.
[2] 初萌. 个性化推荐服务商合理注意义务之重构[J]. 科技与法律, 2020(2): 89-94.
[3] 张吉豫, 汪赛飞. 数字向善原则下算法推荐服务提供者的著作权注意义务[J]. 知识产权, 2022(11): 54-74.
[4] 王迁. 网络环境中的著作权保护研究[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2011.
[5] 虞婷婷. 网络服务商过错判定理念的修正——以知识产权审查义务的确立为中心[J]. 政治与法律, 2019(10): 123-133.
[6] 熊皓男. 论网络服务提供者的版权审查义务[J]. 电子知识产权, 2021(6): 34-43.
[7] 王杰. 网络存储空间服务提供者的注意义务新解[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2020, 38(3): 100-113.
[8] 何培育, 刘梦雪. 技术中立原则在信息网络传播权保护领域的适用[J]. 重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 29(3): 42-50.
[9] 王迁. 网络著作权专有权利研究[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2022.
[10] 李倩, 李保芳. 从技术中立到科技向善: 算法推荐服务提供者的注意义务[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(社会科学), 2024, 38(8): 134-145.
[11] 中国保护知识产权网. YouTube称收到数百万个不正确的视频版权删除请求[EB/OL]. 2021-12-16.
http://ipr.mofcom.gov.cn/article/gjxw/zfxd/mz/202112/1967041.html, 2024-11-07.
[12] 程啸. 侵权责任法[M]. 第3版. 北京: 法律出版社: 2021.
[13] 谢惠加, 何林翀. 算法推荐视角下短视频平台注意义务的完善[J]. 中国出版, 2022(19): 23-28.
[14] 魏露露. 互联网创新视角下社交平台内容规制责任[J]. 东方法学, 2020(1): 27-33.