电商平台自治规范的司法审查及其边界研究
Judicial Review of E-Commerce Platform Autonomy Norms and Power Boundary Research
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2024.1341508, PDF,   
作者: 汪圣娣:浙江理工大学法政学院,浙江 杭州
关键词: 电商平台自治规范司法审查权力边界E-Commerce Platform Autonomy Norms Judicial Review Power Boundary
摘要: 随着电子商务的快速发展,中国已成为全球最大的网络零售市场,电商平台的自治规范对维护市场秩序和保护消费者权益发挥着关键作用。电商平台作为兼具市场与企业双重属性的平台,其自治规范在促进交易的同时,也引发了公权力与私权利交融的新问题。电商平台利用技术和信息优势可能打破与用户之间的平等地位,导致利益失衡,因此司法审查介入成为必要。本文探讨了司法审查的具体路径并通过明确审查标准、坚持自治优先和穷尽内部救济原则、以及根据平台分类和内容确定不同司法审查强度等方式对电商平台自治与司法审查的边界进行界定,平衡电商平台内部治理与外部治理。通过这些分析,本文旨在为电商平台自治规范的司法审查提供理论支持和实践指导,以促进互联网法治化进程和保障各方利益的平衡。
Abstract: In the light of e-commerce, China has emerged as the preeminent online retail market globally. The autonomous regulation of e-commerce platforms is pivotal in sustaining market order and safeguarding consumer rights and interests. As entities that embody both market and enterprise characteristics, the autonomy and regulatory frameworks governing e-commerce platforms not only facilitate transactions but also engender new challenges concerning the interplay between public authority and private rights. The technological and informational advantages leveraged by e-commerce platform may disrupt the parity between users and providers, potentially leading to an inequitable distribution of interests, thereby necessitating judicial review intervention. This essay delineates the pathway for judicial review and delineates the demarcation between the autonomy of e-commerce platforms and judicial review by establishing review criteria, adhering to the principles of prioritizing autonomy and exhausting internal remedies, and calibrating the intensity of judicial review according to the classification and content of the platform. This approach seeks to reconcile the internal and external governance of e-commerce platforms. Through comprehensive analysis, this paper aspires to furnish both theoretical foundations and practical guidance for the judicial review of the autonomy norms governing e-commerce platforms, ultimately fostering the advancement of the rule of law in the digital sphere and ensuring a balanced equilibrium of interests among all stakeholders.
文章引用:汪圣娣. 电商平台自治规范的司法审查及其边界研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2024, 13(4): 3165-3171. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2024.1341508

参考文献

[1] 商务部. 商务部电子商务司负责人介绍2023年我国电子商务发展情况[EB/OL].
http://file.mofcom.gov.cn/article/syxwfb/202401/20240103467547.shtml, 2024-07-05.
[2] 章志远. 迈向公私合作型行政法[J]. 法学研究, 2019, 41(2): 137-153.
[3] 叶逸群. 互联网平台责任: 从监管到治理[J]. 财经法学, 2018(5): 49-63.
[4] 李树民. 裁判职责的元点: 一元论还是二元论[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2019, 22(4): 118-128.
[5] 李占国. 网络社会司法治理的实践探索与前景展望[J]. 中国法学, 2020(6): 5-23.
[6] 周恒. 受规整的自治: 论对互联网平台自治规范的审查[J]. 天津行政学院学报, 2022, 24(6): 73-83.
[7] 刘浩然. 论网络平台规则效力的司法审查[J]. 行政法学研究, 2023(3): 141-152.
[8] 周莉欣. 电商平台自治法律机制的构建[J]. 法商研究, 2024, 41(2): 106-123.
[9] 肖峰. 数字经济条件下电商平台责任认定难题和治理出路[J]. 重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 36(3): 72-82.
[10] 斯蒂文∙J∙伯顿. 法律的道路及其影响[M]. 张芝梅, 陈绪刚, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2005: 419.
[11] 网络交易监管司. 关于对《互联网平台分类分级指南(征求意见稿)》《互联网平台落实主体责任指南(征求意见稿)》公开征求意见的公告[EB/OL].
https://www.samr.gov.cn/hd/zjdc/art/2023/art_c0086d02fcc544ea9506c997b3ac93c1.html, 2024-07-05.