电商平台知识产权恶意投诉法律规制研究
Research on the Legal Regulation of Malicious Complaints about Intellectual Property Rights of E-Commerce Platforms
摘要: 《电子商务法》与《民法典》所制定的“通知–删除”救济机制,其初衷是为真正的知识产权权利人提供一个便捷高效的维权路径,能够及时制止侵犯知识产权的行为。但近年来屡屡发生滥用该制度的恶意投诉现象,不但对电商平台内的经营者造成极大损失,也破坏了电商平台的运行秩序。本文通过分析何为恶意投诉行为以及恶意投诉行为产生的原因,提出应积极合理采取反向保全措施、特殊时间点缴纳保证金、恶意投诉保险、惩罚性赔偿等制度,从而遏制恶意投诉现象的发生。
Abstract: The original intention of the “notice-takedown” relief mechanism formulated by the E-Commerce Law and the Civil Code is to provide a convenient and efficient way for true intellectual property rights holders to protect their rights, and to stop the infringement of intellectual property rights in a timely manner. However, in recent years, there have been repeated malicious complaints about the abuse of the system, which not only caused great losses to the operators in the e-commerce platform, but also undermined the operation order of the e-commerce platform. This paper analyzes what malicious complaints are and the causes of malicious complaints, and proposes that reverse preservation measures, deposit payment at special points in time, insurance for malicious complaints, punitive damages and other systems should be actively and reasonably adopted to curb the occurrence of malicious complaints.
文章引用:胡卉. 电商平台知识产权恶意投诉法律规制研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2024, 13(4): 4599-4605. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2024.1341681

参考文献

[1] 毕文轩. 电商平台涉知识产权侵权治理的困境与纾解——基于司法裁判的实证分析[J]. 南开学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024(1): 67-80.
[2] 林韶. 电子商务平台知识产权恶意投诉的竞争法规制[J]. 电子知识产权, 2023(9): 44-57.
[3] 祝珺. 电商平台知识产权保护问题研究[J]. 知识产权, 2020(4): 66-73.
[4] 李超光, 林秀芹. 《电子商务法》下“恶意错误通知”认定标准研究[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 41(3): 115-121.
[5] 兰昊. 电商领域知识产权“通知-删除”规则的困境与出路[J]. 知识产权, 2020(4): 53-65.
[6] 孔祥俊, 毕文轩. 电子商务平台知识产权恶意投诉的规制困境及其化解——以2018-2020年已决案例为样本的分析[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022(1): 107-118.
[7] 李晓秋, 李雪倩. 民法典时代电商平台专利恶意投诉之规制路径[J]. 南通大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 38(4): 122-131.
[8] 王迁. 论“通知与移除”规则对专利领域的适用性——兼评《专利法修订草案(送审稿)》第63条第2款[J]. 知识产权, 2016(3): 20-32.
[9] 魏宁. 电子商务中“通知-删除”规则滥用的规制——以平台自治与法律实施为视角[J]. 南大法学, 2022(5): 93-107.