新创企业数智化发展与创新产出——基于制度环境的调节作用
The Development of Digitalization and Intelligentization and Innovation Output in Start-Ups—Based on the Moderation Effect of Institutional Environment
摘要: 在数智经济时代,推动新创企业加速数智化转型、提升创新能力,已成为驱动企业发展的核心因素。本文以2013~2022年创业板企业为样本,采用文本分析法测算数智化发展程度,基于竞争理论、资源编排理论、制度理论,探究新创企业数智化发展对创新产出的影响及其作用机理,研究结果表明:新创企业数智化发展能够显著提升创新产出,在考虑内生性等问题后,这一结果依然显著,并在进行一系列稳健性检验后结论仍然成立。在作用机理方面,良好的制度环境对新创企业数智化发展与创新产出之间的关系起到了正向调节作用。基于异质性研究发现,新创企业数智化发展对创新产出的促进作用在大规模企业、非国有企业、处于数字基础设施较完善的地区的企业中更为显著。本研究为推动新创企业数智化以及提高企业创新产出提供了有益的理论支持和政策建议。
Abstract: In the era of digital and intellectual economy, it has become a core factor to drive the development of enterprises to accelerate the digital and intellectual transformation and enhance the innovation capability of start-ups. Taking a dataset from companies listed on the Growth Enterprise Market (GEM) of China from 2013 to 2022 as the research sample, this article adopted textual analysis to measure the degree of digitalization and intelligentization development, and based on competition theory, resource orchestration theory and institutional theory, it explored the impact of digitalization and intelligentization development of start-ups on innovation output and its mechanism of action. The empirical results of the study show that the development of digitalization and intelligentization in start-ups can significantly enhance innovation output, which remains significant after considering issues such as endogeneity, and the conclusions continue to hold after a series of robustness tests. In terms of the mechanism of action, a favorable institutional environment positively moderates the relationship between the development of digitalization and intelligentization and innovation output of start-ups. Based on the heterogeneity study, it is found that the promotion of innovation output by the development of digitalization and intelligentization in start-ups is more significant among large-scale enterprises, non-state-owned enterprises, and enterprises in regions with better digital infrastructure. This article provides useful theoretical support and policy recommendations to promote the digitalization and intelligentization of start-ups as well as to improve enterprises’ innovation output.
文章引用:蔡琪涵, 程李梅. 新创企业数智化发展与创新产出——基于制度环境的调节作用[J]. 电子商务评论, 2024, 13(4): 4738-4750. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2024.1341699

参考文献

[1] Desa, G. and Basu, S. (2013) Optimization or Bricolage? Overcoming Resource Constraints in Global Social Entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7, 26-49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 沈馨怡, 吴松强. 数智化发展、双重网络嵌入与新创企业韧性——长三角中小集成电路企业的实证研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2024, 42(4): 797-804.
[3] 张秀娥, 王卫, 于泳波. 数智化转型对企业新质生产力的影响研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2024(5): 1-19.
[4] 张双伶, 夏娟. 数智化转型、创新驱动与零售企业效率提升[J]. 商业经济研究, 2024(8): 169-172.
[5] 梁玲玲, 李烨, 陈松. 数智赋能对企业开放式创新的影响: 数智双元能力和资源复合效率的中介作用[J]. 技术经济, 2022, 41(6): 59-69.
[6] 吕荣杰, 宋志烨, 张义明, 郝力晓. 数智化使能企业跨界搜索提升创新绩效的模式匹配与选择——基于知识治理机制视角[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(24): 133-142.
[7] 李先江, 张紫怡, 李炎. 制造业企业数智化转型对双元产品创新能力的影响研究——数智化知识整合的中介作用[J]. 商业研究, 2024(4): 130-136.
[8] 王莉娜, 郭誉森. 数智化和制造企业创新质量——来自中国上市企业的经验证据[J]. 工业技术经济, 2023, 42(4): 13-23.
[9] 余菲菲, 曹佳玉, 杜红艳. 数字化悖论: 企业数字化对创新绩效的双刃剑效应[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2022, 34(2): 1-12.
[10] 孟凡生, 徐野, 赵刚. “智能+”对制造企业创新绩效的影响机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(9): 109-118.
[11] Donbesuur, F., Ampong, G.O.A., Owusu-Yirenkyi, D. and Chu, I. (2020) Technological Innovation, Organizational Innovation and International Performance of SMEs: The Moderating Role of Domestic Institutional Environment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, Article ID: 120252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 杨震宁, 赵红. 中国企业的开放式创新: 制度环境、“竞合”关系与创新绩效[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(2): 139-160+224.
[13] 单宇, 许晖, 周连喜, 周琪. 数智赋能: 危机情境下组织韧性如何形成?——基于林清轩转危为机的探索性案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(3): 84-104, 7.
[14] Jacobides, M.G., Cennamo, C. and Gawer, A. (2018) Towards a Theory of Ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39, 2255-2276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Reeves, M., Levin, S., Fink, T. and Levina, A. (2020) Taming Complexity. Harvard Business Review, 98, 112-21.
[16] Peng, M.W. (2002) Towards an Institution-Based View of Business Strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19, 251-267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Wang, C., Yi, J., Kafouros, M. and Yan, Y. (2015) Under What Institutional Conditions Do Business Groups Enhance Innovation Performance? Journal of Business Research, 68, 694-702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 杨博旭, 王玉荣, 李兴光, 张冰. 技术多元化对双元创新绩效的影响研究: 基于正式与非正式制度环境的视角[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2021, 42(12): 145-162.
[19] 吴伟伟, 张天一. 非研发补贴与研发补贴对新创企业创新产出的非对称影响研究[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(3): 137-160.
[20] 吴非, 胡慧芷, 林慧妍, 任晓怡. 企业数字化转型与资本市场表现——来自股票流动性的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(7): 130-144.
[21] 王砚羽, 王澳莹. 开放式创新、制度环境与企业数字化转型——基于中国制造业上市公司的实证检验[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2024(6): 1-24.
[22] 王小鲁, 樊纲, 余静文. 中国分省份市场化指数报告(2016) [M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2017.
[23] 杨记军, 逯东, 杨丹. 国有企业的政府控制权转让研究[J]. 经济研究, 2010, 45(2): 69-82.
[24] 李婉红, 李娜. 绿色创新、数字化转型与高耗能企业碳减排绩效[J]. 管理工程学报, 2023, 37(6): 66-76.
[25] 郑玉. 数字基础设施建设对企业创新影响机理探究——基于“宽带中国”战略试点准自然实验的实证检验[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2023(4): 90-104.
[26] 黄勃, 李海彤, 刘俊岐, 雷敬华. 数字技术创新与中国企业高质量发展——来自企业数字专利的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(3): 97-115.