近60a丽江人体舒适度指数变化特征
Characteristics of Human Comfort Index Changes in Lijiang in the Recent 60 Years
DOI: 10.12677/ccrl.2024.136180, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 陶 钰*, 韩 琳#, 林静薇, 楚茹茵, 吴振亚, 肖国杰:成都信息工程大学大气科学学院,四川 成都
关键词: 人体舒适度温湿指数气候变化丽江Human Comfort Index Temperature Humidity Index Climate Change Lijiang
摘要: 本文利用丽江站1960~2019年逐日平均气温、相对湿度资料,统计分析了丽江市近60a人体舒适度指数的等级分布特征,利用线性趋势研究人体舒适度指数的年际变化特征和季节变化特征。研究结果表明:(1) 丽江市人体舒适度指数等级在2~6级间变化,主要集中在3~5级,其中舒适度4级日数最多,在全年1~12月中均有出现,舒适度5级日数次之;(2) 丽江市最舒适的月份为5~9月,其次为2~4月、10~11月,最不舒适的月份为1月、12月;(3) 1960~2019年丽江年均人体舒适度指数存在非常显著的上升趋势,线性趋势为0.30/10a,于2019年达到最高值,人体舒适度指数平均值为56.22,属于舒适度4级;(4) 丽江地区四季的人体舒适度指数从高到低为夏季、春季、秋季、冬季,四季的人体舒适度指数均存在显著的上升趋势,其中冬季的上升趋势最明显,线性趋势达到0.40/10a,春、夏季次之,秋季最低。
Abstract: Based on the daily average temperature and relative humidity data of Lijiang Station from 1960 to 2019, this paper analyzed the grade distribution characteristics of Human Comfort Index in Lijiang City in the past 60 years, and used the linear trend to study the interannual and seasonal variation characteristics of Human Comfort Index. The results showed that: (1) The Human Comfort Index in Lijiang City ranges from level 2 to level 6, predominantly falling within levels 3 to 5, among which the number of days with comfort level 4 was the largest, which appeared from January to December throughout the year, followed by the number of days with comfort level 5; (2) The most comfortable months in Lijiang are from May to September, followed by February to April and October to November, and the most uncomfortable months are January and December. (3) From 1960 to 2019, the average annual Human Comfort Index in Lijiang had a very significant upward trend, with a linear trend of 0.30/10a, reaching the highest value in 2019, and the average Human Comfort Index was 56.22, corresponding to comfort level 4. (4) The Human Comfort Index in Lijiang area from high to low in summer, spring, autumn and winter, and there was a significant upward trend in the four seasons, among which the upward trend was the most obvious in winter, with a linear trend of 0.40/10a, followed by spring and summer, and the lowest in autumn.
文章引用:陶钰, 韩琳, 林静薇, 楚茹茵, 吴振亚, 肖国杰. 近60a丽江人体舒适度指数变化特征[J]. 气候变化研究快报, 2024, 13(6): 1676-1681. https://doi.org/10.12677/ccrl.2024.136180

参考文献

[1] 刘梅, 于波, 姚克敏. 人体舒适度研究现状及其开发应用前景[J]. 气象科技, 2002, 30(1): 11-14.
[2] Houghton, F.C. and Yaglou, C.P. (1923) Determining Equal Comfort Lines. Journal of the American Society of Heating and Ventilating Engineers, 29, 165-176.
[3] Brunt, D. (1945) Climate and Human Comfort. Nature, 155, 559-564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Terjung, W.H. (1966) Physiologic Climates of the Conterminous United States: A Bioclimatic Classification Based on Man. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 56, 141-179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Oliver, J.E. (1978) Climate and Man’s Environment: An Introduction to Applied Climatology. John Wiley & Sons.
[6] Steadman, R.G. (1979) The Assessment of Sultriness. Part I: A Temperature-Humidity Index Based on Human Physiology and Clothing Science. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 18, 861-873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 陆鼎煌, 崔森, 李重和. 北京城市绿化夏季小气候条件对人体的适宜度[D]//中国农学会农业气象研究会, 中国林学会. 林业气象论文集. 北京: 气象出版社, 1984: 144-152.
[8] 范业正, 郭来喜. 中国海滨旅游地气候适宜性评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 1998, 13(4): 306-311.
[9] 李馥丽, 马丽君, 孙根年, 等. 陕西省旅游气候舒适度评价[J]. 资源科学, 2007, 29(6): 40-44.
[10] 贾海源, 陆登荣. 甘肃省人体舒适度地域分布特征研究[J]. 干旱气象, 2010, 28(4): 449.
[11] 王胜, 田红, 谢五三, 等. 近50年安徽省气候舒适度变化特征及区划研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(1): 40-45.
[12] 于庚康, 徐敏, 于堃, 等. 近30年江苏人体舒适度指数变化特征分析[J]. 气象, 2011, 37(9): 1145-1150.
[13] 郭广, 张静, 马守存, 等. 1961-2010年青海省人体舒适度指数时空分布特征[J]. 冰川冻土, 2015, 37(3): 845-854.
[14] 张林林, 陈铁喜. 1989-2018年京津冀地区人体舒适度的变化特征[J]. 天津师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 41(4): 53-60.
[15] 李积宏, 周刊社, 张东东. 西藏高原人体舒适度指数时空变化特征分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2024, 47(6): 980-992.
[16] 朱卫浩, 张书余, 罗斌. 近30a全国人体舒适度指数变化特征[J]. 干旱气象, 2012, 30(2): 220-226.
[17] 潘娜, 肖国杰, 邬亮, 等. 丽江近62a气温变化特征分析[J]. 气象研究与应用, 2016, 37(3): 74-78.
[18] 赖云华. 丽江气候变化研究[J]. 气候变化研究快报, 2023, 12(5): 913-924.