逃避躺平与意义幸福倾向:中庸思维的调节作用
Avoiding Lying Flat and Eudaimonic Orientation: The Moderating Role of Zhongyong Thinking
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2024.1412905, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 刘 玲:广州新华学院心理健康教育教研室,广东 广州;谢开圣*:华南师范大学心理学院,广东 广州;陈欣欣, 廖颖珊:浙江师范大学心理学院,浙江 金华
关键词: 逃避躺平意义幸福倾向人际关系困扰中庸思维Avoiding Lying Flat Eudaimonic Orientation Interpersonal Distress Zhongyong Thinking
摘要: 目的:探究大学生逃避躺平、人际关系困扰、中庸思维与意义幸福倾向之间的关系及内在作用机制。方法:使用逃避躺平问卷、人际综合诊断量表、中庸思维量表和意义幸福倾向量表对611名大学生进行施测。结果:1) 逃避躺平、人际关系困扰、中庸思维和意义幸福倾向四个变量,两两存在相关关系。2) 人际关系困扰在逃避躺平与意义幸福倾向二者关系中起部分中介作用。3) 中庸思维在逃避躺平和人际关系困扰中起正向调节作用。结论:逃避躺平不仅能够直接使大学生意义幸福倾向降低,也能通过加剧人际关系困扰而使得意义幸福倾向降低。中庸思维能够缓解由逃避躺平引起的人际关系困扰,且中庸思维水平越高,缓解效果越好。
Abstract: Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of avoiding lying flat on eudaimonic orientation as well as the mediating effect of interpersonal distress and the moderating effect of Zhongyong thinking. Methods: A sample of 611 college students was recruited in the study to complete the Questionnaires of Lying Flat, Interpersonal Relationships Assessment Scale, Zhongyong Thinking Scale and Orientations to Happiness Scale. Results: 1) The four variables, namely, avoiding lying flat, interpersonal distress, eudaimonic orientation and Zhongyong thinking, were correlated with each other; 2) Interpersonal distress partially mediates the relationship between Avoiding Lying Flat and Eudaimonic Orientation; 3) Zhongyong thinking moderates the relationship between avoiding lying flat and interpersonal distress. Conclusion: Avoiding lying flat can not only directly reduce eudaimonic orientation of college students, but also exacerbate interpersonal distress, which can lead to a decrease in the eudaimonic orientation. Zhongyong thinking can alleviate the interpersonal distress caused by avoiding lying flat, and the higher the level of Zhongyong thinking, the better the alleviation effect.
文章引用:刘玲, 谢开圣, 陈欣欣, 廖颖珊 (2024). 逃避躺平与意义幸福倾向:中庸思维的调节作用. 心理学进展, 14(12), 435-443. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2024.1412905

参考文献

[1] 陈佩儀, 陈瑜, 杨雪岭(2021). 中庸思维对大学生抑郁症状的影响机制: 消极认知情绪调节策略的中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 19(4), 571-576.
[2] 杜旌, 段承瑶(2017). 中庸影响个体的作用机制: 基于任务和关系视角的研究. 珞珈管理评论, (1),77-90.
[3] 巩萱萱(2023). 大学生中庸思维与学习倦怠的关系: 消极认知情绪调节的中介作用. 中国健康心理学杂志, 31(11), 1735-1739.
[4] 郭震, 杨莹, 张梦圆, 等(2018). 幸福倾向及其对幸福感的影响: 机制及发展. 青年研究, (6), 1-9.
[5] 郎艺, 张帆, 尹俊, 等(2024). 中庸思维与员工数字化变革支持行为: 学习目标导向和团队环境的作用. 中国人力资源开发, 41(2), 45-60.
[6] 李帅, 赵伟, 龙沛欣, 等(2022). 觉醒还是逃避: 躺平问卷编制及相关心理因素. 心理技术与应用, 10(10), 618-630.
[7] 梁婷, 张亚丹, 郑雪艳, 等(2023). 大学生智慧对主观幸福感的影响: 自信心与人际关系困扰的中介作用. 心理月刊, 18(2), 90-92.
[8] 林龙飞, 高延雷(2021). “躺平青年”: 一个结构性困境的解释. 中国青年研究, (10), 78-84.
[9] 吕国庆, 周琰(2021). 意义幸福倾向与幸福感的关系: 亲社会行为和基本心理需要的多重中介作用. 心理技术与应用, 9(2), 95-101.
[10] 沈东(2022). “内卷与躺平”冲击下中国青年奋斗精神的熔铸. 中国青年研究, (2), 30-36.
[11] 石霞飞, 王芳, 左世江(2015). 追求快乐还是追求意义?青少年幸福倾向及其对学习行为的影响. 心理发展与教育, 31(5), 586-593.
[12] 孙时进, 李伟, 陆新和, 等(2021). 大象突围和年轻人的躺平: 如何在一个变动的系统中寻找新秩序. 青年学报, (3), 89-100.
[13] 吴才智, 荣硕, 朱芳婷, 等(2018). 基本心理需要及其满足. 心理科学进展, 26(6), 1063-1073.
[14] 吴佳辉, 林以正(2005). 中庸思维量表的编制. 本土心理学研究, (24), 247-300.
[15] 杨晓莉, 马书采, 高晓丽(2009). 应对方式在大学生人格建构复杂性与人际关系中的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 17(6), 764-766.
[16] 赵丹, 王勇慧, 李娟娟, 等(2014). 应对方式在硕士研究生生活满意度与生命意义关系中的中介作用. 中国健康心理学杂志, 22(11), 1733-1735.
[17] 郑日昌(1999). 大学生心理诊断. 山东教育出版社.
[18] 周浩, 龙立荣(2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, (6), 942-950.
[19] Bandura, A. (1989). Human Agency in Social Cognitive Theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175-1184.[CrossRef
[20] Bubić, A., & Erceg, N. (2018). The Role of Decision Making Styles in Ex-plaining Happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19, 213-229.[CrossRef
[21] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.[CrossRef
[22] Delle Fave, A., Brdar, I., Freire, T., Vella-Brodrick, D., & Wissing, M. P. (2011). The Eudaimonic and Hedonic Components of Happiness: Qualitative and Quantitative Findings. Social Indicators Research, 100, 185-207.[CrossRef
[23] Huta, V. (2012). Linking Peoples’ Pursuit of Eudaimonia and Hedonia with Characteristics of Their Parents: Parenting Styles, Verbally Endorsed Values, and Role Modeling. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 47-61.[CrossRef
[24] Huta, V., & Waterman, A. S. (2014). Eudaimonia and Its Distinction from He-donia: Developing a Classification and Terminology for Understanding Conceptual and Operational Definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 1425-1456.[CrossRef
[25] Jiang, J., Zhang, Y., Ke, Y., Hawk, S. T., & Qiu, H. (2015). Can’t Buy Me Friendship? Peer Rejection and Adolescent Materialism: Implicit Self-Esteem as a Mediator. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 58, 48-55.[CrossRef
[26] Kryza-Lacombe, M., Tanzini, E., & O’Neill, S. (2019). Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motives: Associations with Academic Achievement and Negative Emotional States among Urban College Students. Journal of Happi-ness Studies, 20, 1323-1341.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Markey, P., Markey, C., Nave, C., & August, K. (2014). Interpersonal Prob-lems and Relationship Quality. Journal of Research in Personality, 51, 1-8.[CrossRef
[28] Ortner, C. N. M., Corno, D., Fung, T. Y., & Rapinda, K. (2018). The Roles of Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motives in Emotion Regulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 209-212.[CrossRef
[29] Park, N., Peterson, C., & Ruch, W. (2009). Orientations to Happiness and Life Satisfaction in Twenty-Seven Nations. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 273-279.[CrossRef
[30] Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Orientations to Happiness and Life Satisfaction: The Full Life versus the Empty Life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 25-41.[CrossRef
[31] Pollock, N. C., Noser, A. E., Holden, C. J., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2016). Do Ori-entations to Happiness Mediate the Associations between Personality Traits and Subjective Well-Being? Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 713-729.[CrossRef
[32] Popescu, M. L., Drumm, R., Dewan, S., & Rusu, C. (2010). Childhood Vic-timization and Its Impact on Coping Behaviors for Victims of Intimate Partner Violence. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 575-585.[CrossRef
[33] Zhou, Z., Hu, L., Sun, C., Li, M., Guo, F., & Zhao, Q. (2019). The Effect of Zhongyong Thinking on Remote Association Thinking: An EEG Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 207.[CrossRef] [PubMed]