衬膜水稻技术对科尔沁沙地土壤线虫群落特征的影响
Effects of Film Lined Rice Technology on Soil Nematode Community Characteristics in Horqin Sandy Land
DOI: 10.12677/aep.2024.146166, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 效志怡, 吴 同, 尤鹤旋, 梁 雷*:辽宁大学环境学院,辽宁 沈阳
关键词: 土壤线虫衬膜水稻营养类群群落特征Soil Nematode Film Lined Rice Trophic Groups Community Characteristics
摘要: 为了分析衬膜水稻对科尔沁沙地土壤线虫群落组成与结构特征的影响,探明不同处理对科尔沁沙地土壤线虫群落组成与营养类群分布差异的成因,本研究以未修复的沙地为对照,分析了水稻田和休耕地0~10、10~20、20~30 cm土层中土壤线虫群落的变化特征。结果表明:(1) 沙地、水稻田、休耕地的线虫优势属存在差异,小杆总科(Rhabditidae)为其共同的优势属,随着水稻田和休耕地的修复,威尔斯属(Wilsonema)、前矛线属(Prodorylaimium)成为新的优势属;(2) 随水稻田、休耕地的修复,土壤线虫的总数呈先升高后降低的趋势,在0~10、10~20 cm的土层中水稻田中土壤线虫的总数与沙地、休耕地的土壤线虫的总数存在显著差异;而在20~30 cm的土层中沙地、水稻田、休耕地土壤线虫的总数之间则不存在显著差异;(3) 沙地、水稻田、休耕地土壤线虫生活史的策略在0~20 cm的土层中以c-p1为主,偏向于r对策者,而在20~30 cm的土层中,土壤线虫生活史的策略以c-p4和c-p5为主,偏向于K对策者。特别是在水稻田修复后,休耕地各土层各c-p类群线虫的相对多度相比于沙地逐渐趋于稳定,逐渐向K对策者转变,c-p4为其主要的优势类群;(4) 沙地、休耕地的土壤线虫营养类群的个体密度表现为杂食–捕食性线虫 > 食细菌线虫 > 食真菌线虫 > 植食性线虫,而水稻田土壤线虫营养类群的个体密度表现为食细菌线虫 > 杂食–捕食性线虫 > 植食性线虫 > 食真菌线虫。土壤线虫群落分布特征可以反映衬膜水稻技术对科尔沁沙地土壤微环境的变化,对土壤质量具有一定的指示作用,能够为科尔沁沙地土壤生态系统的科学管理提供理论支撑。
Abstract: In order to analyze the influence of film lined rice on the composition and structural characteristics of soil nematode community in Horqin Sandy Land, and to find out the causes of different treatments on the composition and distribution of trophic groups of soil nematode community in Horqin Sandy Land, this study took the uncultivated sandy land as a control, and analyzed the changing characteristics of soil nematode community in 0~10, 10~20, 20~30 cm soil layers of rice fields and fallow land. The results showed that: (1) There were differences in the dominant genera of nematodes among sandy land, paddy fields, and fallow land, with Rhabditidae being the common dominant genus. With the restoration of paddy fields and fallow land, Wilsonema and Prodorylaimium became new dominant genera; (2) With the restoration of paddy fields and fallow land, the total number of soil nematodes showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing. There were significant differences in the total number of soil nematodes between paddy fields and sandy and fallow land in the 0~10 and 10~20 cm soil layers; However, there was no significant difference in the total number of soil nematodes among sandy land, paddy fields, and fallow land in the soil layer of 20~30 cm; (3) The strategies for the life history of soil nematodes in sandy land, paddy fields, and fallow land are mainly based on c-p1 in the 0~20 cm soil layer, leaning towards the r strategy, while in the 20~30 cm soil layer, the strategies for the life history of soil nematodes are mainly based on c-p4 and c-p5, leaning towards the K strategy. Especially after the restoration of rice fields, the relative abundance of nematodes in different c-p groups in various soil layers of fallow land gradually stabilized compared to sandy land, and gradually shifted towards K strategies, with c-p4 being the main dominant group; (4) The individual density of soil nematode trophic groups in sandy and fallow land is as follows: omnivorous predatory nematodes > bacterial eating nematodes > fungal eating nematodes > herbivorous nematodes, while the individual density of soil nematode trophic groups in paddy fields is as follows: bacterial eating nematodes > omnivorous predatory nematodes > herbivorous nematodes > fungal eating nematodes. The distribution characteristics of soil nematode community can reflect the changes of soil microenvironment caused by film lined rice technology in Horqin Sandy Land, have a certain indication effect on soil quality, and can provide theoretical support for the scientific management of soil ecosystem in Horqin Sandy Land.
文章引用:效志怡, 吴同, 尤鹤旋, 梁雷. 衬膜水稻技术对科尔沁沙地土壤线虫群落特征的影响[J]. 环境保护前沿, 2024, 14(6): 1320-1329. https://doi.org/10.12677/aep.2024.146166

参考文献

[1] Yeates, G.W. and Bongers, T. (1999) Nematode Diversity in Agroecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 74, 113-135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Hofmann, P., Kahnt, K., Mätz-Rensing, K., Brack, M. and Kaup, F. (2001) Three Spontaneous Lymphomas in a Colony of Cotton-Top Tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Journal of Medical Primatology, 30, 322-327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 张晓珂, 董锡文, 梁文举, 蒋德明, 姜思维. 科尔沁沙地流动沙丘土壤线虫群落组成与多样性研究[J]. 土壤, 2009, 41(5): 749-756.
[4] 王康富. 内蒙科尔沁沙地奈曼地区沙漠化土地综合整治初步研究[J]. 中国沙漠, 1989, 9(1): 33-37.
[5] 于艳华, 乌兰图雅, 阿拉腾图雅. 科尔沁沙地退耕还林还草的生态效应分析——以通辽市奈曼旗为例[J]. 国土资源科技管理, 2007, 24(1): 23-28.
[6] de Goede, R.G.M. and Verschoor, B. (2000) The Nematode Extraction Efficiency of the Oostenbrink Elutriator-Cottonwool Filter Method with Special Reference to Nematode Body Size and Life Strategy. Nematology, 2, 325-342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Bongers, T. (1988) The Nematodes of the Netherlands.
[8] Bongers, A.M.T. (1988) De nematoden van Nederland. Stichting Uitgeverij Koninklijke Nederlandse Natuurhistorische Vereniging.
[9] Bongers, T. and Bongers, M. (1998) Functional Diversity of Nematodes. Applied Soil Ecology, 10, 239-251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Norton, J.H., Shepherd, M.A., Abdon-Naguit, M.R. and Lindsay, S. (1993) Mortalities in the Giant Clam Hippopus Hippopus Associated with Rickettsiales-Like Organisms. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 62, 207-209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Bongers, T. (1990) The Maturity Index: An Ecological Measure of Environmental Disturbance Based on Nematode Species Composition. Oecologia, 83, 14-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] 戴征凯, 赵菊林, 宋谨琦, 等. “绿色南京”林业建设新增林地的土壤生物的群落结构[J]. 土壤通报, 2012, 43(1): 66-69.
[13] 洪毅, 张伟东, 王雪峰, 等. 庄河口湿地不同土地利用方式下土壤线虫群落特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2014(10): 54-59.
[14] 佟富春, 肖以华, 王庆礼. 长白山次生林演替过程中土壤线虫群落结构特点[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2009, 30(3): 63-68.
[15] 华建峰, 姜勇, 梁文举. 植被覆盖对土壤线虫营养类群空间分布的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17(2): 295-299.
[16] Kang, B.S., Kim, S., Ren, F., Gila, B.P., Abernathy, C.R. and Pearton, S.J. (2005) Comparison of MOS and Schottky W/Pt-GaN Diodes for Hydrogen Detection. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 104, 232-236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Liang, W., Lou, Y., Li, Q., Zhong, S., Zhang, X. and Wang, J. (2009) Nematode Faunal Response to Long-Term Application of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Organic Manure in Northeast China. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 41, 883-890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 胡宁, 娄翼来, 梁雷. 保护性耕作对土壤线虫c-p类群及功能团的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2009, 18(6): 2349-2353.
[19] 张晓珂, 梁文举, 李琪. 长白山森林土壤线虫[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2013.
[20] 邢树文, 李云, 李金林, 等. 不同种植年限蕉柑根际土壤线虫群落及营养类群结构特征[J]. 果树学报, 2017, 34(12): 1599-1609.
[21] 欧伟, 李琪, 梁文举, 等. 稻田不同水分管理方式对土壤线虫群落的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(10): 1921-1925.
[22] 梁林琳, 刘奇志, 谢娜, 等. 枯黄草坪土壤线虫营养类群结构及其调节因素[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2011, 23(5): 948-954.
[23] Bakonyi, G. and Nagy, P. (2000) Temperature and Moisture-Induced Changes in the Structure of the Nematode Fauna of a Semiarid Grassland—Patterns and Mechanisms. Global Change Biology, 6, 697-707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] 刘奇志, 梁林琳, 杨端, 等. 北京永丰地区绿化带草坪土壤线虫群落特征分析[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(5): 136-141.
[25] 刘奇志, 边勇, 谢文闻, 等. 甘肃天水麦田土壤线虫种群结构与土壤健康指数初探[J]. 西北农业学报, 2006, 15(2): 81-84.
[26] Wasilewska, L. (1994) The Effect of Age of Meadows on Succession and Diversity in Soil Nematode Communities. Pedobiologia, 38, 1-11.
[27] 钟爽, 曾会才, 金志强. 不同土壤类型蕉园土壤线虫群落结构的分布特征[J]. 广东农业科学, 2013, 40(17): 64-67+70.
[28] Wu, Y., Chen, W., Entemake, W., Wang, J., Liu, H., Zhao, Z., et al. (2021) Long-Term Vegetation Restoration Promotes the Stability of the Soil Micro-Food Web in the Loess Plateau in North-West China. Catena, 202, Article 105293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef