近十年国内外适老化产品用户体验发展趋势及研究热点
Development Trends and Research Hotspots of User Experience in Aging-Appropriate Products Domestically and Internationally over the Past Decade
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2025.151029, PDF,   
作者: 李梓明, 向洧杭:浙江工业大学教育学院,浙江 杭州
关键词: 适老化老年人产品辅具用户体验CiteSpaceAging-Appropriate Elderly Products Assistive Devices User Experience CiteSpace
摘要: 为了解近10年国内外适老化产品用户体验的发展趋势及研究热点,通过CiteSpace可视化软件对CNKI知网以及Web of Science数据库中2012年~2023年的相关文献进行梳理,并根据结果进行分析,得出以下相关结论:1) 在发表趋势方面,适老化产品用户体验研究领域的期刊发表数量大体呈现上升趋势,国外发表数量显著高于国内;2) 国内相关研究更多集中于计算机、工业设计等领域,而国外更多集中于医疗领域;3) 近年来在国内,助行器、助浴产品、智能穿戴设备等针对不同老年人群体的适老化产品受到了更多的关注和研究,而在国外较受关注的方面有远程看护、智能住宅、数字健康等。
Abstract: To understand the development trends and research hotspots of user experience (UX) in aging-appropriate products domestically and internationally over the past decade, this paper utilizes CiteSpace visualization software to review relevant literature from the CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) and Web of Science databases spanning from 2012 to 2023. Based on the analysis of the results, the following conclusions are drawn: 1) In terms of publication trends, the number of journal publications in the field of UX in aging-appropriate products generally shows an upward trend, with significantly higher publication numbers abroad than domestically. 2) Domestically, more research is concentrated in areas such as computer science and industrial design, while abroad, there is a greater focus on the medical field. 3) In recent years, in China, aging-appropriate products targeting different elderly groups such as walkers, bath aids, and smart wearable devices have received more attention and research, while abroad, aspects such as remote caregiving, smart homes, and digital health are more prominent.
文章引用:李梓明, 向洧杭 (2025). 近十年国内外适老化产品用户体验发展趋势及研究热点. 心理学进展, 15(1), 232-244. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2025.151029

参考文献

[1] 陈悦, 陈超美, 刘则渊, 等(2015). CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能. 科学学研究, 33(2), 242-253.
[2] 窦金花, 覃京燕(2021). 智慧健康养老产品适老化设计与老年用户研究方法. 包装工程, 42(6), 62-68.
[3] 国家卫生健康委, 教育部, 科技部, 等(2022). 关于印发“十四五”健康老龄化规划的通知. 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会公报, (2), 16-25.
[4] 李贺, 袁翠敏, 李亚峰(2014). 基于文献计量的大数据研究综述. 情报科学, 32(6), 148-155.
[5] 林峰, 吕虹漫, 沈通, 等(2023). 面向失能老人的助浴浴缸设计研究. 设计, 36(4), 130-133.
[6] 刘卓, 张芳燕, 郭伟(2015). 基于用户体验角度的老年人交互性产品设计研究. 包装工程, 36(2), 63-66.
[7] 马源鸿, 邹广天(2020). 社区居家养老环境的智能化设计策略与挑战. 学术交流, (9), 121-130.
[8] 潘黎, 王素(2011). 近十年来教育研究的热点领域和前沿主题——基于八种教育学期刊2000-2009年刊载文献关键词共现知识图谱的计量分析. 教育研究, 32(2), 47-53.
[9] 王愉, 辛向阳, 虞昊, 罗伽音(2021). 服务设计文献计量可视化分析. 南京艺术学院学报(美术与设计), (2), 99-105.
[10] 徐江, 孙刚, 欧细凡(2021). 设计学交叉研究的文献计量分析. 南京艺术学院学报(美术与设计), (2), 91-98.
[11] 杨前华, 万宇(2016). 基于增强现实技术的老年人导航应用系统设计. 电视技术, 40(11), 39-42.
[12] AAL Association (2021). What Is AAL?
https://aalgroup.org/about/
[13] Brom, C., Stárková, T., & D’Mello, S. K. (2018). How Effective Is Emotional Design? A Meta-Analysis on Facial Anthropomorphisms and Pleasant Colors during Multimedia Learning. Educational Research Review, 25, 100-119.[CrossRef
[14] Chen, C. (2004). Searching for Intellectual Turning Points: Progressive Knowledge Domain Visualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 5303-5310.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Czaja, S. J., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Rogers, W. A., & Sharit, J. (2018). Improving Social Support for Older Adults through Technology: Findings from the PRISM Randomized Controlled Trial. The Gerontologist, 58, 467-477.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Lee, C., & Coughlin, J. F. (2015). PERSPECTIVE: Older Adults’ Adoption of Technology: An Integrated Approach to Identifying Determinants and Barriers. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32, 747-759.[CrossRef
[17] Lexie, K. (2019). Usability for Seniors: Challenges and Changes. Nielsen Norman Group.
[18] Liang, C., Luo, A., & Zhong, Z. (2018). Knowledge Mapping of Medication Literacy Study: A Visualized Analysis Using Citespace. SAGE Open Medicine, 6.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Mercer, K., Giangregorio, L., Schneider, E., Chilana, P., Li, M., & Grindrod, K. (2016). Acceptance of Commercially Available Wearable Activity Trackers among Adults Aged over 50 and with Chronic Illness: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 4, e7.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Moore, K., O’Shea, E., Kenny, L., Barton, J., Tedesco, S., Sica, M. et al. (2021). Older Adults’ Experiences with Using Wearable Devices: Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 9, e23832.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Nebeker, C., & Zlatar, Z. Z. (2021). Learning from Older Adults to Promote Independent Physical Activity Using Mobile Health (mhealth). Frontiers in Public Health, 9, Article 703910.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Peek, S. T. M., Wouters, E. J. M., van Hoof, J., Luijkx, K. G., Boeije, H. R., & Vrijhoef, H. J. M. (2014). Factors Influencing Acceptance of Technology for Aging in Place: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83, 235-248.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Pires, G., Lopes, A., Correia, P., Almeida, L., Oliveira, L., Panda, R. et al. (2023) Usability of a Telehealth Solution Based on TV Interaction for the Elderly: The VITASENIOR-MT Case Study. Universal Access in the Information Society, 22, 525-536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Small, H. (1973). Co‐Citation in the Scientific Literature: A New Measure of the Relationship between Two Documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24, 265-269.[CrossRef
[25] Smith, A. (2014). Older Adults and Technology Use.
http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/04/03/older-adults-and-technology-use/
[26] Smith, A., Jones, B., & Green, C. (2021) User Experience of Aging-in-Place Technologies: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 37, 1-25.
[27] United Nations (2022). World Population Prospects 2022: Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/474). Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.
[28] Wildenbos, G. A., Peute, L., & Jaspers, M. (2018). Aging Barriers Influencing Mobile Health Usability for Older Adults: A Literature Based Framework (MOLD-US). International Journal of Medical Informatics, 114, 66-75.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Zou, L., & Sun, L. (2000). Global Diabetic Kidney Disease Research from 2000 to 2017: A Bibliometric Analysis. Medicine, 98, e14394.[CrossRef] [PubMed]