繁殖感问卷(LGS)在中国老年人群体中的修订及信效度检验
Revision and Reliability-Validity Test of the Loyola Generativity Scale (LGS) in Chinese Elderly
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2025.152068, PDF,   
作者: 张义鑫*, 余 林:西南大学心理学部,重庆
关键词: 繁殖感问卷修订中国老年人Generativity Scale Revision Chinese Elderly
摘要: 目的:将繁殖感问卷(LGS)在中国老年人群体中进行修订,并检验其信效度。方法:采用半结构式访谈、专家评估和问卷调查法等对LGS进行修订,并分别在256名老年人和300名老年人中进行问卷初测和再测。结果:修订后的问卷具有较好信度,量表总体Cronbach’s α = 0.92,各维度Cronbach’s α系数均在0.69~0.85之间;探索性和验证性因素分析的结果表明,修订问卷具有良好的结构效度,条目在所属因子上的因素载荷均超过0.57,验证性因素分析的拟合指标也均符合心理学领域的要求;修订问卷具有较好的效标关联效度,各维度分数及问卷总分与效标问卷分数均显著正相关,相关系数r在0.47~0.69之间。结论:修订后的繁殖感量表具有较好的心理测量学属性,可以作为评定我国老年人繁殖感的有效工具。
Abstract: Objective: To revise the Loyola Generativity Scale (LGS) for the elderly in China and examine its reliability and validity. Methods: The LGS was revised using semi-structured interviews, expert evaluation, and questionnaire surveys. The initial and retest of the questionnaire were conducted among 256 elderly individuals and 300 elderly individuals respectively. Results: The revised scale showed good reliability, with an overall Cronbach’s α of 0.92, and Cronbach’s α for each dimension ranging from 0.69 to 0.85. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis results indicated good construct validity: the factor loadings of items on their respective factors exceeded 0.57. Additionally, the confirmatory factor analysis fit indices also met the required standards for psychological measurement. The revised scale also showed good criterion-related validity, as the scores of each dimension and the total score were significantly positively correlated with the criterion measure, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.47 to 0.69. Conclusion: The revised Loyola Generativity Scale has good psychometric properties and can serve as an effective tool for assessing generativity in Chinese elderly.
文章引用:张义鑫, 余林 (2025). 繁殖感问卷(LGS)在中国老年人群体中的修订及信效度检验. 心理学进展, 15(2), 123-132. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2025.152068

参考文献

[1] 刘红云(2019). 高级心理统计. 中国人民大学出版社.
https://book.cppinfo.cn/Encyclopedias/home/index?id=3377187
[2] 温忠麟, 侯杰泰, 马什赫伯特(2004). 结构方程模型检验:拟合指数与卡方准则. 心理学报, (2), 186-194.
[3] 吴明隆(2010). 问卷统计分析实务: SPSS操作与应用. 重庆大学出版社.
https://www.zhangqiaokeyan.com/book-cn/08150958138.html
[4] 中国政府网(2021). 中共中央国务院关于加强新时代老龄工作的意见.
https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-11/24/content_5653181.htm
[5] An, J. S., & Cooney, T. M. (2006). Psychological Well-Being in Mid to Late Life: The Role of Generativity Development and Parent–child Relationships across the Lifespan. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 410-421.[CrossRef
[6] Au, A., Lai, S., Wu, W., Hofer, J., Busch, H., Šolcová, I. P. et al. (2020). Generativity and Positive Emotion in Older Adults: Mediation of Achievement and Altruism Goal Attainment across Three Cultures. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21, 677-692.[CrossRef
[7] Cheng, S., Chan, W., & Chan, A. C. M. (2008). Older People’s Realisation of Generativity in a Changing Society: The Case of Hong Kong. Ageing and Society, 28, 609-627.[CrossRef
[8] Cox, K. S., Wilt, J., Olson, B., & McAdams, D. P. (2010). Generativity, the Big Five, and Psychosocial Adaptation in Midlife Adults. Journal of Personality, 78, 1185-1208.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Datta Roy, M., & Panda, M. (2022). Is Generativity Erikson’s Answer to Human Ageing in the Neoliberal World? Journal of Aging Studies, 62, Article 101057.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and Society (2nd ed.). Norton.
[11] Gager, C. T., Gunn, J. F., Goldstein, S. E., & Martinez, S. M. (2024). Thwarted Belonging and Perceived Burdensomeness during Middle and Older Adulthood: The Role of Generativity. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 99, 25-46.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Grossbaum, M. F., & Bates, G. W. (2002). Correlates of Psychological Well-Being at Midlife: The Role of Generativity, Agency and Communion, and Narrative Themes. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 120-127.[CrossRef
[13] Grossman, M. R., & Gruenewald, T. L. (2020). Failure to Meet Generative Self-Expectations Is Linked to Poorer Cognitive–affective Well-Being. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75, 792-801.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Gruenewald, T. L., Liao, D. H., & Seeman, T. E. (2012). Contributing to Others, Contributing to Oneself: Perceptions of Generativity and Health in Later Life. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67, 660-665.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Hart, H. M., McAdams, D. P., Hirsch, B. J., & Bauer, J. J. (2001). Generativity and Social Involvement among African Americans and White Adults. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 208-230.[CrossRef
[16] Hawley, G. A. (1985). Construction and Validation of an Eriksonian Measure of Psychosocial Development. ProQuest Information & Learning, 45, Article 2804.
[17] Hofer, J., Busch, H., Au, A., Poláčková Šolcová, I., Tavel, P., & Tsien Wong, T. (2014). For the Benefit of Others: Generativity and Meaning in Life in the Elderly in Four Cultures. Psychology and Aging, 29, 764-775.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Hopflinger, F. (2002). Generativität im höheren Lebensalter Generationensoziologische Überlegungen zu einem alten Thema. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 35, 328-334.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] McAdams, D. P., & de St. Aubin, E. (1992). A Theory of Generativity and Its Assessment through Self-Report, Behavioral Acts, and Narrative Themes in Autobiography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 1003-1015.[CrossRef
[20] McAdams, D. P., & Guo, J. (2015). Narrating the Generative Life. Psychological Science, 26, 475-483.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] McAdams, D. P., de St. Aubin, E., & Logan, R. L. (1993). Generativity among Young, Midlife, and Older Adults. Psychology and Aging, 8, 221-230.[CrossRef
[22] Millova, K., & Blatny, M. (2016). Generativity in Contemporary Empirical Research. Ceskoslovenska Psychologie, 60, 609-621.
[23] Murayama, Y., Hasebe, M., Nishi, M., Matsunaga, H., Narita, M., Nemoto, Y. et al. (2022). The Effects of Reciprocal Support on Mental Health among Intergenerational Non-Relatives—A Comparison by Age Group. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 99, Article 104601.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Ong, A. D., Graham, E. K., Jackson, K., Atherton, O. E., Luo, J., Willroth, E. C. et al. (2024). Associations between Generativity and Social Asymmetry among Older Adults in Japan. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 79, gbad183.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Pozzi, M., Marta, E., Marzana, D., Gozzoli, C., & Ruggieri, R. A. (2014). The Effect of the Psychological Sense of Community on the Psychological Well-Being in Older Volunteers. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 10, 598-612.[CrossRef
[26] Shimizu, Y., Takahashi, T., Sato, K., Ogawa, S., Cho, D., Takahashi, Y. et al. (2023). Perceptions of Older Adults and Generativity among Older Citizens in Japan: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study. Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives, 14, 427-432.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Villar, F., Serrat, R., & Pratt, M. W. (2023). Older Age as a Time to Contribute: A Scoping Review of Generativity in Later Life. Ageing and Society, 43, 1860-1881.[CrossRef
[28] Wiktorowicz, J., Warwas, I., Turek, D., & Kuchciak, I. (2022). Does Generativity Matter? A Meta-Analysis on Individual Work Outcomes. European Journal of Ageing, 19, 977-995.[CrossRef] [PubMed]