知识图谱视域下近10年(2014~2024)学术语篇中评价资源研究的热点分析
Analysis of Research Hotspots in Evaluative Resources in Academic Discourse from 2014 to 2024 under the Perspective of Knowledge Graph
摘要: 本文综合运用CiteSpace 6.3知识图谱工具，对2014至2024年间Web of Science核心合集数据库中的学术语篇评价资源研究文献进行了系统性分析。研究发现，该领域的文献发表量和引用频次均呈现增长趋势，表明学术语篇评价资源研究的活跃度和学术影响力在不断增强。通过共被引作者和期刊分析，本研究揭示了学术语篇分析和评价理论领域的核心贡献者及高影响力期刊。关键词共现分析揭示了八个主要研究聚类，其中体裁分析作为核心主题。最后指出了当前研究的不足，包括跨学科研究的深化、非语言资源的评价意义探索以及多模态评价资源的整合等方面的研究空白，旨在推动学术语篇评价资源研究在理论和实践层面的进一步发展。
Abstract: This paper comprehensively utilizes the CiteSpace 6.3 knowledge mapping tool to conduct a systematic analysis of research literature on evaluative resources in academic discourse from the Web of Science Core Collection database between 2014 and 2024. The study reveals that both the volume of publications and citation frequency in this field have shown an upward trend, indicating increasing activity and academic influence in research on evaluative resources in academic discourse. Through co-citation analysis of authors and journals, this research identifies core contributors and high-impact journals in the fields of academic discourse analysis and evaluation theory. Keyword co-occurrence analysis uncovers eight major research clusters, with genre analysis emerging as a central theme. Finally, the study highlights current research gaps, including the need for deeper interdisciplinary exploration, the investigation of the evaluative significance of non-linguistic resources, and the integration of multimodal evaluative resources. These findings aim to promote further development in the theoretical and practical aspects of research on evaluative resources in academic discourse.
文章引用：章苗苗. 知识图谱视域下近10年(2014~2024)学术语篇中评价资源研究的热点分析[J]. 现代语言学, 2025, 13(2): 557-565. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2025.132195

参考文献

[1] 姜亚军, 赵刚. 学术语篇的语言学研究: 流派分野和方法整合[J]. 外语研究, 2006(6): 1-5, 80.
[2] Swales, J.M. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press.
[3] Biber, D. (1988) Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] Bazermann, C. (1988) Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. University of Wisconsin Press.
[5] Hood, S. (2004) Appraising Research: Taking a Stance in Academic Writing. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Technology.
[6] Ivanič, R. and Camps, D. (2001) I Am How I Sound: Voice as Self-Representation in L2 Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 3-33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] Hinkel, E. (2009) The Effects of Essay Topics on Modal Verb Uses in L1 and L2 Academic Writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 667-683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] 徐昉, 龚晶. 二语学术写作言据性资源使用的实证研究[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2014, 37(4): 12-22.
[9] Thompson, G. and Yiyun, Y. (1991) Evaluation in the Reporting Verbs Used in Academic Papers. Applied Linguistics, 12, 365-382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] Hyland, K. (2005) Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse. Discourse Studies, 7, 173-192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Hunston, S. AND Thompson, G. (2000) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford University Press.
[12] Martin, J.R. AND White, P.R.R. (2005) The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
[13] 徐昉. 英语学术语篇语类结构研究述评(1980-2012) [J]. 东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2013, 15(5): 128-133.
[14] 邓鹂鸣, 周韵. 基于CiteSpace的国际学术语篇研究可视化分析[J]. 外语教学, 2020, 41(1): 54-58.
[15] 李涛, 王次臣, 李华康. 知识图谱的发展与构建[J]. 南京理工大学学报, 2017, 41(1): 22-34.
[16] Xu, X. and Nesi, H. (2019) Differences in Engagement: A Comparison of the Strategies Used by British and Chinese Research Article Writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 121-134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] Loi, C., Lim, J.M. and Wharton, S. (2016) Expressing an Evaluative Stance in English and Malay Research Article Conclusions: International Publications versus Local Publications. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21, 1-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] Xu, J., Yang, J. and He, D. (2023) Control-Value Appraisals, Academic Emotions, and Student Engagement: A Case of Chinese EFL Undergraduates. Language Teaching Research. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[19] Du, Y. and Gao, X.J. (2024) From General Critical Questions to Scheme-Relevant Critical Questions in the Instruction on Argument Evaluation for EFL Graduate Students: A Two-Cycle Action Research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 74, 23-28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]