不同任务框架下的风险决策：时间距离和社会距离的影响
Risk Decision-Making under Different Task Frameworks: The Impact of Time Distance and Social Distance
摘要: 本研究探讨了在不同框架下，时间距离和社会距离如何影响人们的风险决策偏好，并考察了三者之间的可能交互作用。其中，框架分为收益和损失；社会距离包括为自己或为他人进行决策；而时间距离是为当前还是为一个月后进行决策。结果发现：(1) 三个主效应显著。损失框架下，为他人，为一个月后进行决策时，人们更倾向于冒险。(2) 交互作用显著。为自我决策时进行当前收益的决策，有最小的风险寻求。研究结果支持了社会和时间距离对决策的相似影响；符合解释水平理论，随着心理距离的增加，与高解释水平相关的价值的权重增加，使得参与者更倾向于选择收益更大的风险选项。
Abstract: This study explores how time distance and social distance affect people’s risk decision-making preferences under different frameworks, and examines the possible interactions between the three. Among them, the framework is divided into gains and losses; social distance includes making decisions for oneself or for others; and whether to make a decision based on the current time distance or one month later. The results showed that: (1) Three main effects were significant. Under the loss framework, people are more inclined to take risks when making decisions for others one month later. (2) The interaction is significant: Seeking the minimum risk when making current profit decisions for self decision-making. The research results support the similar impact of social and temporal distance on decision-making. According to the construal level theory, as psychological distance increases, the weight of values associated with high construal level increases, making participants more inclined to choose risk options with greater returns.
文章引用：魏昱程, 麻珂 (2025). 不同任务框架下的风险决策：时间距离和社会距离的影响. 心理学进展, 15(2), 396-403. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2025.152099

参考文献

[1] 陈海贤, 何贵兵(2014). 心理距离对跨期选择和风险选择的影响. 心理学报, 46(5), 677-690.
[2] 段婧, 刘永芳, 何琪(2012). 决策者角色及相关变量对风险偏好的影响. 心理学报, 44(3), 369-376.
[3] 刘永芳, 陈雪娜, 卢光莉, 王怀勇(2010). 决策者角色及相关因素对风险偏好的影响. 心理科学, 33(3), 548-551.
[4] 徐惊蛰, 谢晓非(2011). 解释水平视角下的自己-他人决策差异. 心理学报, 43(1), 11-20.
[5] Albrecht, K., Volz, K. G., Sutter, M., Laibson, D. I., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2011). What Is for Me Is Not for You: Brain Correlates of Intertemporal Choice for Self and Other. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6, 218-225.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Andersson, O., Holm, H. J., Tyran, J., & Wengstrrm, E. (2014). Deciding for Others Reduces Loss Aversion. Working Management Science, IFN Working Paper No. 967.[CrossRef] 
[7] Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2006). The Association between Psychological Distance and Construal Level: Evidence from an Implicit Association Test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 609-622.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Binswanger, H. P. (1980). Attitudes toward Risk: Experimental Measurement in Rural India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62, 395-407.[CrossRef] 
[9] De Martino, B., Kumaran, D., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Frames, Biases, and Rational Decision-Making in the Human Brain. Science, 313, 684-687.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Faro, D., & Rottenstreich, Y. (2006). Affect, Empathy, and Regressive Mispredictions of Others’ Preferences under Risk. Management Science, 52, 529-541.[CrossRef] 
[11] Fleming, A. C., & Slank, K. L. (2015). Making a Choice: Self-Other Differences Indecision Making in Risky Situations. North American Journal of Psychology, 17, 633-648.
[12] Fujita, K., Henderson, M. D., Eng, J., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2006). Spatial Distance and Mental Construal of Social Events. Psychological Science, 17, 278-282.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Hsee, C. K., & Weber, E. U. (1997). A Fundamental Prediction Error: Self-Others Discrepancies in Risk Preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 45-53.[CrossRef] 
[14] Jung, D., Sul, S., & Kim, H. (2013). Dissociable Neural Processes Underlying Risky Decisions for Self versus Other. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, Article No. 15.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-292.[CrossRef] 
[16] Kim, H., Schnall, S., & White, M. P. (2013). Similar Psychological Distance Reduces Temporal Discounting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1005-1016.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Kim, K., Zhang, M., & Li, X. (2008). Effects of Temporal and Social Distance on Consumer Evaluations: Table 1. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 706-713.[CrossRef] 
[18] Kray, L. J. (2000). Contingent Weighting in Self-Other Decision Making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 82-106.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The Role of Feasibility and Desirability Considerations in Near and Distant Future Decisions: A Test of Temporal Construal Theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 5-18.[CrossRef] 
[20] Liberman, N., Sagristano, M. D., & Trope, Y. (2002). The Effect of Temporal Distance on Level of Mental Construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 523-534.[CrossRef] 
[21] Malkoc, S. A., Zauberman, G., & Bettman, J. R. (2010). Unstuck from the Concrete: Carryover Effects of Abstract Mindsets in Intertemporal Preferences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113, 112-126.[CrossRef] 
[22] Nussbaum, S., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Creeping Dispositionism: The Temporal Dynamics of Behavior Prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 485-497.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Polman, E., & Wu, K. (2020). Decision Making for Others Involving Risk: A Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 77, Article ID: 102184.[CrossRef] 
[24] Pronin, E., Olivola, C. Y., & Kennedy, K. A. (2008). Doing Unto Future Selves as You Would Do Unto Others: Psychological Distance and Decision Making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 224-236.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Robins, R. W., Spranca, M. D., & Mendelsohn, G. A. (1996). The Actor-Observer Effect Revisited: Effects of Individual Differences and Repeated Social Interactions on Actor and Observer Attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 375-389.[CrossRef] 
[26] Sagristano, M. D., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2002). Time-Dependent Gambling: Odds Now, Money Later. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 364-376.[CrossRef] 
[27] Smith, P. K., & Trope, Y. (2006). You Focus on the Forest When You're in Charge of the Trees: Power Priming and Abstract Information Processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 578-596.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Stone, E. R., & Allgaier, L. (2008). A Social Values Analysis of Self-Other Differences in Decision Making Involving Risk. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30, 114-129.[CrossRef] 
[29] Sun, Q., Polman, E., & Zhang, H. (2021). On Prospect Theory, Making Choices for Others, and the Affective Psychology of Risk. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 96, Article ID: 104177.[CrossRef] 
[30] Trautmann, S. T., & van de Kuilen, G. (2012). Prospect Theory or Construal Level Theory? Diminishing Sensitivity vs. Psycho-Logical Distance in Risky Decisions. Acta Psychologica, 139, 254-260.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal Construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403-421.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-Level Theory of Psychological Distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440-463.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal Levels and Psychological Distance: Effects on Representation, Prediction, Evaluation, and Behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 83-95.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Williams, L. E., Stein, R., & Galguera, L. (2014). The Distinct Affective Consequences of Psychological Distance and Construal Level. Journal of Consumer Research, 40, 1123-1138.[CrossRef]