中文版化妆感受量表在女大学生群体中的验证
Validation of the Chinese Version of the Makeup Questionnaire among Female College Students
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2025.152100, PDF,   
作者: 元同骁：常州工学院学生工作处，江苏 常州；严瀚钦：河海大学公共管理学院，江苏 南京
关键词: 化妆；自我客体化；女大学生；量表验证；Makeup； Self-Objectification； Female College Students； Scale Validation
摘要: 目的：汉化国外化妆感受量表(Makeup Questionnaire, MUQ)，并在中国女大学生群体中验证其心理测量学特性。方法：研究采用随机抽样和整群抽样法，于2023年9月选取江苏、福建、四川、贵州四省的1370名在校女大学生参与了调查，回收有效问卷1294份，使用自我客体化量表(SOQ)作为效标，2周后随机抽取142名女大学生进行重测。结果：中文版MUQ的6个题项均具有良好的区分度，探索性和验证性因素分析结果(χ2/df = 2.926, RMSEA = 0.062, GFI = 0.985, CFI = 0.974, TLI = 0.952, SRMR = 0.036)均支持二因素结构模型，量表的信效度均符合心理测量学要求。结论：中文版MUQ具有良好的信效度，可作为我国女大学生化妆感受研究的有效测量工具。
Abstract: Objective: To translate the Makeup Questionnaire (MUQ) into Chinese and validate its psychometric properties among Chinese female college students. Methods: The study used random sampling and whole cluster sampling methods to select 1370 school female college students in four provinces, Jiangsu, Fujian, Sichuan and Guizhou, to participate in the survey in September 2023, 1294 valid questionnaires were collected, and 142 female college students were randomly selected for retest 2 weeks later using the self-objectification Scale (SOQ) as the criterion. Results: All the 6 items in the Chinese version of MUQ had good differentiation. The results of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (χ2/df = 2.926, RMSEA = 0.062, GFI = 0.985, CFI = 0.974, TLI = 0.952, SRMR = 0.036) supported the two-factor structure model, and the reliability and validity of the scale met the requirements of psychometrics. Conclusion: The Chinese version of MUQ has good reliability and validity, and can be used as an effective measurement tool for the study of female college students’ makeup perception.
文章引用：元同骁, 严瀚钦 (2025). 中文版化妆感受量表在女大学生群体中的验证. 心理学进展, 15(2), 404-412. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2025.152100

参考文献

[1] 陈欣, 蒋艳菊(2007). 大学生身体意识量表的修订. 中国心理卫生杂志, 21(9), 610-613.
[2] 温忠麟, 叶宝娟(2014). 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展. 心理科学进展, 22(5), 731-745.
[3] KAWO (2023). 2023中国社交媒体平台指南.
https://kawo.com/cn
[4] Agthe, M., Strobel, M., Spörrle, M., Pfundmair, M., & Maner, J. K. (2016). On the Borders of Harmful and Helpful Beauty Biases: The Biasing Effects of Physical Attractiveness Depend on Sex and Ethnicity. Evolutionary Psychology, 14, 65-68.[CrossRef] 
[5] Anchieta, N. M., Mafra, A. L., Hokama, R. T., Varella, M. A. C., Melo, J. d. A., da Silva, L. O. et al. (2021). Makeup and Its Application Simulation Affect Women’s Self-Perceptions. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50, 3777-3784.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Batres, C., Russell, R., Simpson, J. A., Campbell, L., Hansen, A. M., & Cronk, L. (2018). Evidence That Makeup Is a False Signal of Sociosexuality. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 148-154.[CrossRef] 
[7] Bernard, P., Content, J., Servais, L., Wollast, R., & Gervais, S. (2020). An Initial Test of the Cosmetics Dehumanization Hypothesis: Heavy Makeup Diminishes Attributions of Humanness-Related Traits to Women. Sex Roles, 83, 315-327.[CrossRef] 
[8] Davis, A. C., & Arnocky, S. (2020). An Evolutionary Perspective on Appearance Enhancement Behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51, 3-37.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What Is Beautiful Is Good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285-290.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification Theory: Toward Understanding Women's Lived Experiences and Mental Health Risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173-206.[CrossRef] 
[11] Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts, T., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M., & Twenge, J. M. (1998). That Swimsuit Becomes You: Sex Differences in Self-Objectification, Restrained Eating, and Math Performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269-284.[CrossRef] 
[12] Goodwin, R., Marshall, T., Fülöp, M., Adonu, J., Spiewak, S., Neto, F. et al. (2012). Mate Value and Self-Esteem: Evidence from Eight Cultural Groups. PLOS ONE, 7, e36106.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Kellie, D. J., Blake, K. R., & Brooks, R. C. (2021). Behind the Makeup: The Effects of Cosmetics on Women’s Self‐Objectification, and Their Objectification by Others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 703-721.[CrossRef] 
[14] Kilbourne, J. (2003). Mass Media: Shaping the Self-Concept: Beauty and the Beast of Advertising. In J. M. Henslin (Ed.), Down to Earth Sociology: Introductory Readings (pp. 421-424). Free Press.
[15] McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The Objectified Body Consciousness Scale: Development and Validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181-215.[CrossRef] 
[16] Smith, H., Perez, M., Sladek, M. R., Becker, C. B., Ohrt, T. K., & Bruening, A. B. (2017). Development and Validation of Makeup and Sexualized Clothing Questionnaires. Journal of Eating Disorders, 5, Article No. 39.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Vaes, J., Cristoforetti, G., Ruzzante, D., Cogoni, C., & Mazza, V. (2019). Assessing Neural Responses Towards Objectified Human Targets and Objects to Identify Processes of Sexual Objectification That Go Beyond the Metaphor. Scientific Reports, 9, Article No. 6699.[CrossRef] [PubMed]