0~14岁儿童肺炎支原体肺炎合并胸腔积液的临床特点及危险因素分析
Clinical Characteristics and Risk Factors Analysis of Mycoplasma Pneumoniae Pneumonia Complicated with Pleural Effusion in Children Aged 0~14 Years Old
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2025.152486, PDF,   
作者: 尚 鑫, 金浩男:承德医学院研究生学院,河北 承德;李小燕, 杨菁晴, 李 涛*:承德市中心医院儿科,河北 承德
关键词: 儿童肺炎支原体肺炎胸腔积液临床特征危险因素Children Mycoplasma Pneumoniae Pneumonia Pleural Effusion Clinical Features Risk Factors
摘要: 目的:研究0~14岁儿童肺炎支原体肺炎(MMP)合并胸腔积液(PE)的临床特点及危险因素,为临床诊治提供参考依据。方法:回顾性分析回顾性分析2021年6月至2024年6月我院儿科住院的社区获得性肺炎患儿的临床资料,共收取772例肺炎患儿,其中MMP患儿695例、MPP合并PE患儿77例,收集患儿的各项资料,包括临床特征及实验室检查资料,分析临床特点及危险因素。结果:1) 秋冬季是MMP合并PE的好发季节,MMP合并PE患儿年龄、热峰均高于MPP患儿,且热程,阿奇霉素治疗时间明显延长(P < 0.05)。2) 与MPP组相比,MMP合并PE组的中性粒细胞百分比(NE%)、C-反应蛋白(CRP)、降钙素原(PCT)、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平均升高,白细胞(WBC)、淋巴细胞百分比(LYM%)水平均降低,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。3) Logistic回归分析显示阿奇霉素治疗时间、血清CRP、LDH水平是MMP合并PE的独立危险因素(P < 0.05),通过ROC曲线分析确定血清CRP、LDH预测发生MMP合并PE的危险值依次为19.9 mg/L、334.5 U/L。4) 疫情后MMP合并PE患儿明显多于疫情前患病人数,疫情后MMP合并PE患儿的热程少于疫情前患儿,实验室检查方面,与疫情前相比,疫情后MMP合并PE患儿的PCT水平降低(P < 0.05)。结论:秋冬季是MMP合并PE的好发季节,MPP合并PE患儿年龄更大,热峰更高,热程及阿奇霉素治疗时间长,另阿奇霉素治疗时间与血清CRP、LDH水平均为MMP合并PE患儿的高危因素,对于血清CRP高于19.9 mg/L和(或) LDH高于334.5 U/L的MMP患儿应充分重视并积极治疗。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the clinical characteristics and risk factors of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (MMP) complicated with pleural effusion (PE) in children aged 0~14 years, and provide reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment. Method: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of community-acquired pneumonia patients admitted to our pediatric department from June 2021 to June 2024. A total of 772 pneumonia patients were collected, including 695 children with MMP and 77 children with MPP and PE. Various data, including clinical characteristics and laboratory examination data, were collected to analyze the clinical features and risk factors of the patients. Result: 1) Autumn and winter are the most common seasons for MMP combined with PE. Children with MMP combined with PE have higher age and fever peak than those with MPP, and the fever course and azithromycin treatment time are significantly prolonged (P < 0.05). 2) Compared with the MPP group, the MMP combined with PE group showed an increase in neutrophil percentage (NE%), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, while white blood cell (WBC) and lymphocyte percentage (LYM%) levels decreased, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). 3) Logistic regression analysis showed that treatment time with azithromycin, serum CRP, and LDH levels were independent risk factors for MMP combined with PE (P < 0.05). ROC curve analysis determined that serum CRP and LDH predicted the risk values for MMP combined with PE to be 19.9 mg/L and 334.5 U/L, respectively. 4) After the epidemic, the number of children with MMP combined with PE was significantly higher than before the epidemic. The fever level of children with MMP combined with PE after the epidemic was lower than before the epidemic. In terms of laboratory tests, compared with before the epidemic, the PCT level of children with MMP combined with PE after the epidemic decreased (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Autumn and winter are the peak seasons for MMP combined with PE. Children with MPP combined with PE are older, have higher fever peaks, longer fever duration and azithromycin treatment time. In addition, azithromycin treatment time and serum CRP and LDH levels are high-risk factors for MMP combined with PE. For MMP children with serum CRP higher than 19.9 mg/L and/or LDH higher than 334.5 U/L, full attention and active treatment should be given.
文章引用:尚鑫, 金浩男, 李小燕, 杨菁晴, 李涛. 0~14岁儿童肺炎支原体肺炎合并胸腔积液的临床特点及危险因素分析[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(2): 1377-1385. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.152486

参考文献

[1] 王卫平, 孙锟, 常立文. 儿科学[M]. 第9版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018.
[2] 付玉林, 董艳, 李静. 2018-2019年北京市儿童社区获得性肺炎的病原学分析及临床特点[J]. 中国医药科学, 2022, 12(8): 126-129.
[3] 舒林华, 许姜姜, 王淑, 等. 儿童社区获得性肺炎致病微生物分布及与临床特征的相关性[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2015, 17(10): 1056-1061.
[4] Gao, L., Yin, J., Hu, Y., Liu, X., Feng, X., He, J., et al. (2019) The Epidemiology of Paediatric Mycoplasma pneumoniae Pneumonia in North China: 2006 to 2016. Epidemiology and Infection, 147, e192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] 陈冠华, 陈亚珍. 38例儿童肺炎支原体肺炎合并胸腔积液的临床特征及预后[J]. 黑龙江医药, 2021, 34(1): 153-155.
[6] 赵顺英, 钱素云, 陈志敏, 等. 儿童肺炎支原体肺炎诊疗指南(2023年版) [J]. 传染病信息, 2023, 36(4): 291-297.
[7] 常青, 高燕敏, 闫超, 等. 2015-2016年无锡地区儿童肺炎支原体流行基因特征分析[J]. 中国人兽共患病学报, 2018, 34(7): 668-672.
[8] 刘宇焓, 张晗, 尚云晓. 难治性肺炎支原体肺炎患儿肺泡灌洗液中肺炎支原体-DNA载量检测在病情评估中的临床意义[J]. 中国小儿急救医学, 2020, 27(6): 447-451.
[9] Meyer Sauteur, P.M., van Rossum, A.M.C. and Vink, C. (2014) Mycoplasma pneumoniae in Children: Carriage, Pathogenesis, and Antibiotic Resistance. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, 27, 220-227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] 李丽萍, 孙伟, 王瑞涛. CRP、PCT和IL-8对治疗儿童肺炎支原体肺炎并发胸腔积液的指导价值[J]. 中国医学前沿杂志: 电子版, 2019, 11(8): 46-49.
[11] 王崇杰, 骆学勤, 罗健. 46例重症肺炎支原体肺炎合并胸腔积液患儿临床及预后分析[J]. 临床儿科杂志, 2020, 38(4): 269-274.
[12] 梁茜, 谭丽琴, 韦冰梅, 等. 肺炎支原体流行病学特征及重症肺炎支原体肺炎临床特征[J]. 系统医学, 2024, 9(4): 100-102.
[13] 鲁靖, 赵顺英, 宋蕾. 不同影像学表现的儿童肺炎支原体肺炎临床特征[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志, 2017, 32(4): 284-288.
[14] 殷剑松, 万瑜, 张力文, 等. 肺炎支原体肺炎合并胸腔积液相关因素分析[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2021, 25(3): 54-58.
[15] 王冠玲, 胡斌飞. 肺炎支原体肺炎住院儿童合并胸腔积液的危险因素分析[J]. 医学研究杂志, 2017, 46(2): 142-144, 161.
[16] 冯国昌, 张淑华, 王霞, 等. 2023年10月-2024年3月青岛市肺炎支原体感染情况分析[J]. 预防医学论坛, 2024, 30(8): 589-592.