大数据背景下高等教育综合评价研究——基于因子分析的实证分析
Research on Comprehensive Evaluation of Higher Education in the Context of Big Data—An Empirical Analysis Based on Factor Analysis
DOI: 10.12677/sa.2025.142047, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 唐俊杰:广东财经大学统计与数学学院,广东 广州
关键词: 高等教育评价大数据背景因子分析Higher Education Evaluation Big Data Background Factor Analysis
摘要: 高等教育是提升国家或地区发展竞争力的关键。我国高等教育区域发展差异已愈发明显,要推进区域高等教育协调发展,首先需要对高等教育质量发展水平进行合理与科学的评价。本文从大数据背景对评价指标进行创新,从背景规模、资源投入、实践过程、产出效益四个方面建立我国高等教育高质量发展的评价指标体系。基于因子分析构建了高等教育综合评价模型,对广东省18所本科院校进行了评价。实证研究结果表明,地市间、同市内存在高等教育发展不均衡,经济文化发展越发达的地区,高等教育质量发展水平越高。因此,既要加强地区间各层面高等教育发展的均衡性政策支持,也要加强各高校之间的合作与交流。
Abstract: Higher education is a key factor in enhancing the competitiveness of a country or region’s development. The regional disparities in higher education development in China have become increasingly apparent. To promote the coordinated development of regional higher education, it is necessary to conduct a rational and scientific evaluation of the quality of higher education. This article innovates the evaluation indicators in the context of big data, establishing an evaluation indicator system for the high-quality development of higher education in China from four aspects: background scale, resource input, practical process, and output efficiency. Based on factor analysis, a comprehensive evaluation model for higher education is constructed, and an evaluation of 18 undergraduate institutions in Guangdong Province is conducted. Empirical research results indicate that there is an imbalance in higher education development between cities and within the same city. Regions with more developed economic and cultural development tend to have higher levels of quality in higher education. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen policy support for the balanced development of higher education at all levels between regions and promote cooperation and communication among various universities.
文章引用:唐俊杰. 大数据背景下高等教育综合评价研究——基于因子分析的实证分析[J]. 统计学与应用, 2025, 14(2): 196-205. https://doi.org/10.12677/sa.2025.142047

参考文献

[1] 马星, 冯磊. 英国“教学卓越框架”专业教学质量评估: 特征、反思与启示[J]. 高教探索, 2018(3): 63-69.
[2] 杨浩昌, 葛辉, 张发明. 高等教育高质量发展评价指标体系构建的探讨[J]. 教育导刊, 2020(10): 83-90.
[3] Kuh, G.D. (2001) Assessing What Really Matters to Student Learning: Inside the National Survey of Student Engagement. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 33, 10-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Gillard, J.W. (2017) An Initial Analysis and Reflection of the Metrics Used in the Teaching Excellence Framework in the UK. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 22, 49-57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 周平红, 杨宗凯, 张屹, 等. 基于结构方程模型的我国高等教育信息化水平综合评价研究——来自“中国高校信息化建设与应用水平”的调研[J]. 电化教育研究, 2011(11): 5-10.
[6] 田云章. 高等教育质量的模糊综合评价研究——基于学生家长满意度的视角[J]. 陕西理工学院学报(社会科学版), 2016, 34(1): 105-108.
[7] 张琳. 河南省高等教育综合水平评价探析[J]. 洛阳理工学院学报(社会科学版), 2020, 35(6): 89-93.
[8] 潘兴侠, 刘剑峰, 陈鑫云. 基于熵权和灰色综合评价法的省域高等教育发展水平评价[J]. 南昌航空大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 22(1): 103-110.
[9] 张海英, 周志刚, 刘星. 我国区域高等教育水平的综合评价[J]. 统计与决策, 2013(1): 66-69.
[10] 吕红. 教育学学科领域大数据研究热点主题可视化分析[J]. 中国教育信息化, 2018(10): 1-6.
[11] 马丽芳. 大数据背景下高等教育质量建设的创新路径与发展方向研究——评《高等教育质量标准体系评价与创新路径研究》[J]. 科技管理研究, 2021, 41(23): 235.
[12] 朱永东, 向兴华, 叶玉嘉. 基于因子分析的美国高等教育发展水平综合评价研究[J]. 高教探索, 2014(5): 68-73.