从抑制到促进——东盟技术性贸易措施对中国农产品出口的U型影响
From Inhibition to Promotion—The U-Shaped Impact of ASEAN’s Technical Barriers to Trade on China’s Agricultural Product Exports
摘要: 东盟是我国农产品第一大出口市场,在中国东盟自贸区全面建成情况下,中国近年来频繁遭受东盟国家技术性贸易措施。本文基于人工收集的TBT-SPS通报数据,结合2010年到2022年中国农产品出口东盟各国数据,使用贸易引力模型定量检验东盟各国技术性贸易措施对中国农产品出口影响,以及技术性贸易措施对初级和加工两类农产品不同影响。研究发现技术性贸易措施对于农产品大类贸易量的影响具有U型,正式实施的第一年抑制农产品贸易,正式实施的第二年和第三年,对农产品贸易具有促进作用。从结构上看,技术性贸易措施对于中国加工农产品贸易具有持续促进作用。
Abstract: ASEAN is China’s largest export market for agricultural products. With the comprehensive establishment of the China-ASEAN Free Trade Area, China has frequently encountered technical barriers to trade from ASEAN countries in recent years. Based on manually collected TBT-SPS notification data and combined with Chinese agricultural export data to ASEAN countries from 2010 to 2022, this paper quantitatively examines the impact of ASEAN countries’ technical barriers to trade on Chinese agricultural product exports using the gravity model of trade. It also analyzes the differential effects of technical barriers to trade on primary and processed agricultural products. The study finds that the impact of technical barriers to trade on the trade volume of agricultural products exhibits a U-shaped pattern, with the first year of formal implementation inhibiting agricultural product trade, while the second and third years of formal implementation have a stimulating effect on agricultural product trade. Structurally, technical barriers to trade have a sustained stimulating effect on the trade of processed agricultural products with China.
文章引用:单德好. 从抑制到促进——东盟技术性贸易措施对中国农产品出口的U型影响[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(3): 325-338. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.143713

参考文献

[1] 全毅. 国际农产品贸易中技术性贸易壁垒的现状与趋势[J]. 国际经贸探索, 2005, 21(1): 72-77.
[2] Klimenko, M.M. (2009) Policies and International Trade Agreements on Technical Compatibility for Industries with Network Externalities. Journal of International Economics, 77, 151-166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 王杰. 技术性贸易壁垒成因的理论解析[J]. 农业经济问题, 2010(7): 99-104.
[4] 江凌. 技术性贸易壁垒国内研究综述[J]. 商业时代, 2012(35): 53-54.
[5] 郑金英. 农业标准化: 突破农产品技术性贸易壁垒的必然选择[J]. 中国农学通报, 2008, 24(4): 492-495.
[6] 孙东升, 周锦秀, 杨秀平. 我国农产品出口日本遭遇技术性贸易壁垒的影响研究[J]. 农业技术经济, 2005(5): 6-12.
[7] 张相文, 王贺光, 梁肖. 欧盟技术性壁垒对我国农产品出口的影响分析[J]. 农业经济问题, 2010, 31(4): 105-108.
[8] Fontagné, L. and Orefice, G. (2018) Let’s Try Next Door: Technical Barriers to Trade and Multi-Destination Firms. European Economic Review, 101, 643-663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 田曦, 柴悦. 特别贸易关注视角下技术性贸易措施对我国出口贸易的影响[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2019(3): 41-55.
[10] 王领, 宋熙晨. 欧盟技术性贸易壁垒对我国出口影响的实证研究——基于拓展的贸易引力模型[J]. 重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 36(2): 22-28.
[11] 郑绪涛, 周凌瑞. 日本技术性贸易壁垒对中国农产品出口的影响[J]. 生产力研究, 2019(11): 51-53, 91.
[12] Neeliah, S.A., Neeliah, H. and Goburdhun, D. (2013) Assessing the Relevance of EU SPS Measures to the Food Export Sector: Evidence from a Developing Agro-Food Exporting Country. Food Policy, 41, 53-62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 张小蒂, 李晓钟. 论技术性贸易壁垒对我国农产品出口贸易的双重影响[J]. 管理世界, 2004(6): 26-32, 58.
[14] Curzi, D., Schuster, M., Maertens, M. and Olper, A. (2020) Standards, Trade Margins and Product Quality: Firm-Level Evidence from Peru. Food Policy, 91, Article ID: 101834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 董银果, 李圳. SPS措施: 贸易壁垒还是贸易催化剂——基于发达国家农产品进口数据的经验分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2015, 45(2): 34-45.
[16] 董银果, 黄俊闻. SPS措施对出口农产品质量升级的影响——基于前沿距离模型的实证分析[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2018(10): 45-57.
[17] Melitz, M.J. (2003) The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity. Econometrica, 71, 1695-1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Helpman, E., Melitz, M.J. and Yeaple, S.R. (2004) Export versus FDI with Heterogeneous Firms. American Economic Review, 94, 300-316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Kamal, Y. and Zaki, C. (2018) How Do Technical Barriers to Trade Affect Exports? Evidence from Egyptian Firm-Level Data. Journal of Economic Integration, 33, 659-721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] 郑休休, 刘青, 赵忠秀. 技术性贸易壁垒与中国企业出口调整——“优胜劣汰”与“提质升级” [J]. 中国人民大学学报, 2022, 36(4): 92-107.
[21] 李自若, 杨汝岱, 黄桂田. 内贸成本、外贸成本与畅通国内大循环[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(2): 61-79.
[22] 王冠宇, 马野青. 技术性贸易壁垒对企业出口的溢出影响: 市场溢出还是种类溢出[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2022(10): 38-55.