海洋环保组织在公益诉讼中的法律实践与挑战
Legal Practice and Challenges of Marine Environmental Protection Organizations in Public Interest Litigation
摘要: 我国海洋环境问题日益严峻,受到社会各界的高度重视。海洋环保组织在推动海洋环境治理中的作用不容忽视。近年来,海洋环保组织通过公益诉讼的方式在保护海洋环境、维护公共利益方面作用显著。文章以海洋环保公益诉讼法律基础为核心,结合国内外典型案例,系统分析了海洋环保组织在公益诉讼中的角色定位、法律依据及实际成效,并探讨其面临的制度障碍与资源限制。研究发现,公益诉讼不仅强化了环境法治的执行力,还为公众参与海洋环保提供了法律路径。但是环保组织公益诉讼自主性不足、诉讼信息滞后等问题仍制约其参与效能。基于此,文章提出完善法律制度、提供资源支持及提升公众参与度等建议,以期为海洋环保组织公益诉讼的可持续发展提供理论支撑。
Abstract: The issue of marine environmental degradation in China has become increasingly severe, drawing significant attention from all sectors of society. The role of marine environmental protection organizations in promoting marine environmental governance cannot be overlooked. In recent years, these organizations have played a significant role in protecting the marine environment and safeguarding public interests through public interest litigation. This paper focuses on the legal foundation of marine environmental public interest litigation, combining domestic and international typical cases to systematically analyze the role positioning, legal basis, and practical effectiveness of marine environmental protection organizations in public interest litigation. It also explores the institutional obstacles and resource limitations they face. The study finds that public interest litigation not only strengthens the enforcement of the environmental rule of law but also provides a legal pathway for public participation in marine environmental protection. However, issues such as the lack of autonomy in public interest litigation by environmental organizations and delays in accessing litigation information still constrain their effectiveness. Based on these findings, this paper proposes recommendations for improving legal systems, providing resource support, and enhancing public participation, aiming to offer theoretical support for the sustainable development of public interest litigation by marine environmental protection organizations.
文章引用:陈倩倩. 海洋环保组织在公益诉讼中的法律实践与挑战[J]. 法学, 2025, 13(4): 548-553. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2025.134079

参考文献

[1] 吴宾, 王琪. 海洋社会组织的基本理论问题分析——兼论海洋社会组织在海洋强国建设中的地位与作用[J]. 中国渔业经济, 2014, 32(1): 30-36.
[2] 韩枫. 公益组织在海洋环境公益诉讼中的主体适格性案例评析[J]. 世界海运, 2018, 41(7): 54-56.
[3] 周骁然. 论环境民事公益诉讼中惩罚性赔偿制度的构建[J]. 中南大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 24(2): 52-62.
[4] Jacobs, J.M. (2011) Urban Geographies I: Still Thinking Cities Relationally. Progress in Human Geography, 36, 412-422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 吴卫星. 环保组织提起海洋环境民事公益诉讼的原告资格: 实践检视与法理证成[J]. 南京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 22(6): 36-48, 109-110.
[6] 王翼妍, 满洪杰. 论环境民事公益诉讼原告资格的实践扩张[J]. 法律适用, 2017(7): 78-83.
[7] 刘悦来, 谢宛芸. 共治的景观——基于上海市浦东新区东明街道参与式社区治理实践[J]. 园林, 2022, 39(8): 4-11.
[8] 杨朝霞. 论环境公益诉讼的权利基础和起诉顺位——兼谈自然资源物权和环境权的理论要点[J]. 法学论坛, 2013(3): 102-112.
[9] 梅宏. 海洋环境司法保护的多元主体及其联动机制[J]. 浙江海洋大学学报(人文科学版), 2020, 37(1): 1-8.
[10] Gardner, R. (2016) Leveraging the Clean Water Act in the BP Oil Spill Litigation. Environmental Law Reporter, 46, 10145-10158.
[11] European Union (2019) Directive (EU) 2019/904 on the Reduction of the Impact of Certain Plastic Products on the Environment.
[12] 海南省高级人民法院. 蓝丝带海洋保护协会诉某地产公司生态破坏民事公益诉讼案(环境资源审判典型案例之六) [EB/OL].
http://www.hicourt.gov.cn/news/details_82822.html, 2025-02-20.
[13] 唐召雪. 环境民事公益诉讼原告资格研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古大学, 2024.
[14] 梅宏. 海洋生态环境损害赔偿的新问题及其解释论[J]. 法学论坛, 2017, 32(3): 28-36.
[15] Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. (2015) External Control of Organizations—Resource Dependence Perspective. In: Miner, J.B., Ed., Organizational Behavior 2: Essential Theories of Process and Structure, Routledge, 373-388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Abbey, E.M. (2008) Constructive Regulation of Non-Government Organizations. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 48, 370-376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef