林学英文期刊中名词化的认知语法分析
A Cognitive-Grammatical Analysis of Nominalization in English Journals of Forestry
DOI: 10.12677/ml.2025.134313, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 曾冬梅：邵阳学院外国语学院，湖南 邵阳；蔡艳婷：中南林业科技大学外国语学院，湖南 长沙
关键词: 名词化；语法隐喻；认知语法；林学英文期刊论文；Nominalization； Grammar Metaphor； Cognitive Grammar； Forestry English Journal Papers
摘要: 本研究基于系统功能语言学家和认知语言学家的名词化研究，通过语料库检索软件AntConc 4.2.4对比了林学期刊论文语料库和林学教科书语料库，发现林学英文期刊论文中存在较为普遍的名词化现象，并基于美国罗纳德·韦恩·兰艾克(Ronald Wayne Langacker)的认知语法理论，重点从词汇名词化、动名词两个角度来分析这一现象，然后结合语料库中的真实语料讨论了名词化在林学学术论文写作与翻译中的功能。
Abstract: Based on the research of nominalization by systemic functional linguists and cognitive linguists, this study compares the forestry journal paper corpus and forestry textbook corpus through the corpus search software AntConc 4.2.4, and finds that there is a phenomenon of nominalization in forestry English journal papers. Based on the theory of Ronald Wayne Langacker’s Cognitive Grammar, this phenomenon is examined by focusing on the two perspectives of lexical nominalization and gerundization, and then combined with the real language data in the corpus, the function of nominalization in the forestry academic essay writing and translation is also discussed.
文章引用：曾冬梅, 蔡艳婷. 林学英文期刊中名词化的认知语法分析[J]. 现代语言学, 2025, 13(4): 35-43. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2025.134313

参考文献

[1] Halliday, M.A.K. (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd Edition, Edward Arnold.
[2] 李虹, 董敏华, 徐亚萍. 论名词化在中医文本英译中的运用[J]. 中国中西医结合杂志, 2013, 33(5): 701-704.
[3] Lieber R. (2018) Nominalization: General Overview and Theoretical Issues. In: Aronoff, M., Ed., Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Oxford University Press, 5-6.
[4] Halliday, M.A.K. (1985) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Edward Arnold, 15-16.
[5] Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors We Live by. The University of Chicago Press, 3-6.
[6] Langacker, R.W. (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar (Vol. I): Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford University Press, 12-15.
[7] Langacker R.W. (1991) Foundation of Cognitive Grammar (Vol. V): Descriptive Application. Stanford University Press, 22-50.
[8] 杨波. 概念语法隐喻的认知视角[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报), 2013, 36(5): 27-35.
[9] 胡壮麟. 语法隐喻[J]. 外语教学与研究, 1996(4): 1-7, 80.
[10] 余新兵. 名物化及其对语篇翻译的启示[J]. 南宁师范高等专科学校学报, 2006, 23(1): 64-66.
[11] 徐新宇. 英语名物化结构的语篇功能分析——以国际贸易销售合同为例[J]. 现代外语, 2011, 34(2): 143-150, 219.
[12] 张权. 英语动词名词化的认知结构分析[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报), 2001(6): 29-34.
[13] 方义桂, 丛迎旭. 语法隐喻视角下英汉名形化的认知语义研究[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2020, 43(3): 91-99.
[14] 高航. 认知语法框架下名物化的概念组织层面考察[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2020, 43(2): 68-76, 159-160.
[15] Lu, X. and Ai, H. (2015) Syntactic Complexity in College-Level English Writing: Differences among Writers with Diverse L1 Backgrounds. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 16-27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Jiang, J., Bi, P. and Liu, H. (2019) Syntactic Complexity Development in the Writings of EFL Learners: Insights from a Dependency Syntactically-Annotated Corpus. Journal of Second Language Writing, 46, Article ID: 100666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] Ortega, L. (2015) Syntactic Complexity in L2 Writing: Progress and Expansion. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 82-94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] 钟兰凤, 陈希卉. 隐喻识别研究现状述评[J]. 外语研究, 2013(5): 40-44.
[19] 李文, 郭建辉. 中国高级英语学习者概念语法隐喻能力——基于中外博士论文的研究[J]. 外语教学理论与实践, 2020(1): 50-58.
[20] Biber, D. (1988) Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge University Press, 28-29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[21] Liardét, C.L. (2016) Nominalization and Grammatical Metaphor: Elaborating the Theory. English for Specific Purposes, 44, 16-29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[22] 王春艳. 免费绿色软件AntConc在外语教学和研究中的应用[J]. 外语电化教学, 2009(1): 45-48, 78.
[23] 高航. 现代汉语回指构式中单音节动词的名词化: 认知语法视角[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报), 2019, 42(5): 23-32.
[24] Langacker, R.W. (2008) Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford University Press.
[25] 杨小虎, 王君, 吴雅凤. 名词化的主流学派研究[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2004, 10(5): 101-106.
[26] 李欢. 林业科技英语及其翻译研究——评《林业经济管理英语阅读教程》[J]. 林业经济, 2020, 42(8): 99.
[27] Derewianka, B. (1995) Language Development in the Transition from Childhood to Adolescence: The Role of Grammatical Metaphor. Ph.D. Thesis, Macquarie University.
[28] Ravelli, L.J. (2003) Renewal of Connection: Integrating Theory and Practice in an Understanding of Grammatical Metaphor. In: Simon-Vandenbergen, A.M., Taverniers, M. and Ravelli, L.J., Eds., Grammatical Metaphor: Views from Systemic Functional Linguistics, John Benjamins Publishing Company, 37-64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[29] Comrie, B. (1976) Aspect. Cambridge University Press, 178.
[30] Heyvaert, L. (2015) A Cognitive-Functional Approach to Nominalization in English. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
[31] Alexiadou, A. (2001) Functional Structure in Nominals: Nominalization and Ergativity. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 77-126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[32] Borer, H. (2005) Structuring Sense Volume I: In Name Only. Oxford University Press, 45-50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[33] Grimshaw, J. (1990) Argument Structure. The MIT Press.
[34] Park, C. and Park, B. (2017) Cognitive Grammar and English Nominalization: Event/Result Nominals and Gerundives. Cognitive Linguistics, 28, 711-756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[35] 郭建红. 论科技英语名词化隐喻: 语篇功能和认知效果[J]. 外国语文, 2010, 26(2): 76-78.
[36] 杨丰宁. 名词化现象及其原因[J]. 外语教学, 1996(3): 53-57.