软硬触觉经验对跨期决策的影响——不确定性的中介作用
The Impact of Soft and Hard Tactile Experiences on Intertemporal Decision-Making—The Mediating Role of Uncertainty
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2025.154196, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 张宗豪*#, 胡煜煊*, 杨世杰：山西大学教育科学学院，山西 太原
关键词: 具身认知；跨期决策；软硬触觉；不确定性；Embodied Cognition； Intertemporal Decision-Making； Soft-Hard Tactile Sensation； Uncertainty
摘要: 本研究基于具身认知理论，探讨软硬触觉经验对跨期决策的影响，并通过不确定感这一中介变量解释其影响机制。研究1采用单因素两水平被试间设计(软球组、硬球组)，以114名成人为研究对象，被试被随机分配至不同的组别并充分按压小球后，通过滴定范式、定价范式测量个体的跨期决策行为；研究2以111名成人作为研究对象，以物体的软硬程度及作答环境中的座椅柔软度为自变量，不确定感为中介变量，并使用滴定范式测量跨期决策行为。研究1的结果显示，软硬触觉体验显著影响个体的跨期决策。研究2通过证明触觉体验影响个体不确定感进而影响决策行为，揭示了其背后的心理机制。
Abstract: This study, grounded in embodied cognition theory, examines the effects of soft and hard tactile experiences on intertemporal decision-making, focusing on the mediating role of uncertainty. Study 1 employed a single-factor, two-level between-subjects design with 114 adult participants, who were randomly assigned to either a soft ball group or a hard ball group. After engaging in tactile manipulation by pressing the balls, participants’ intertemporal decision-making was assessed using titration and valuation paradigms. Study 2 involved 111 participants, manipulating the softness and hardness of various objects and the cushioning of seating as independent variables while using uncertainty as a mediating variable. The titration paradigm was utilized to measure intertemporal decision-making behavior. Study 1 found that tactile sensations significantly influenced intertemporal decision-making. Study 2 revealed the underlying psychological mechanisms, demonstrating that these tactile experiences impacted decision-making processes by altering individuals’ perceptions of uncertainty.
文章引用：张宗豪, 胡煜煊, 杨世杰 (2025). 软硬触觉经验对跨期决策的影响——不确定性的中介作用. 心理学进展, 15(4), 179-190. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2025.154196

参考文献

[1] 陈海贤, 何贵兵(2011). 识解水平对跨期选择和风险选择的影响. 心理学报, 43(4), 442-452.
[2] 崔倩, 叶浩生(2013). 触觉经验对性别分类的影响: 具身的视角. 广州大学学报(社会科学版), 12(3), 41-45.
[3] 邓奥(2016). 触觉经验对经济决策的影响. 硕士学位论文, 成都: 四川师范大学.
[4] 蒋元萍, 孙红月(2019). 情绪对跨期决策的影响. 心理科学进展, 27(9), 1622-1630.
[5] 李洁, 黄仁辉, 曾晓青(2015). 不确定性容忍度对跨期选择的影响及其情景依赖性. 心理科学, 38(3), 680-685.
[6] 马文娟, 索涛, 李亚丹, 罗笠铢, 冯廷勇, 李红(2012). 得失框架效应的分离——来自收益与损失型跨期选择的研究. 心理学报, 44(8), 1038-1046.
[7] 温忠麟, 王一帆, 马鹏, 孟进(2024). 变量之间的影响关系和多重影响因素的共同作用类型. 心理学报, 56(10), 1462-1470.
[8] 温忠麟, 叶宝娟(2014). 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展. 心理科学进展, 22(5), 731-745.
[9] 吴莉娟, 王佳宁, 齐晓栋(2016). 简版无法忍受不确定性量表在中学生中应用的效度和信度. 中国心理卫生杂志, 30(9), 700-705.
[10] 吴旭瑶(2021). 不确定感对跨期决策的影响. 硕士学位论文, 武汉: 华中师范大学.
[11] 夏琳(2021). 权力稳定性对合作行为的影响: 不确定感的中介作用和认知闭合需要的调节作用. 硕士学位论文, 武汉: 湖北大学.
[12] 徐岚, 陈全, 崔楠, 陆凯丽(2019). 享受当下, 还是留待未来?——时间观对跨期决策的影响. 心理学报, 51(1), 96-105.
[13] 易仲怡, 杨文登, 叶浩生(2018). 具身认知视角下软硬触觉经验对性别角色认知的影响. 心理学报, 50(7), 793-802.
[14] 张耕, 刘震宇(2010). 在线消费者感知不确定性及其影响因素的作用. 南开管理评论, 13(5), 99-106.
[15] 张夏恒(2020). 新冠肺炎疫情对我国中小微企业的影响及应对. 中国流通经济, 34(3), 26-34.
[16] 周蕾, 林浇敏, 陈艺琦, 梁泳超, 古晨妍, 孙祺章(2024). 不确定性跨期决策视角下绿色行为的心理机制及干预. 心理科学进展, 32(7), 1048-1056.
[17] Ackerman, J. M., Nocera, C. C., & Bargh, J. A. (2010). Incidental Haptic Sensations Influence Social Judgments and Decisions. Science, 328, 1712-1715.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Anderson, M. L. (2007). How to Study the Mind: An Introduction to Embodied Cognition. In F. Santoianni & C. Sabatano (Eds.), Brain Development in Learning Environments: Embodied and Perceptual Advancements (pp. 65-82). Cambridge Scholars Press.
[19] Barkley, R. A., Edwards, G., Laneri, M., Fletcher, K., & Metevia, L. (2001). Executive Functioning, Temporal Discounting, and Sense of Time in Adolescents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD). Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29, 541-556.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Boon-Falleur, M., Baumard, N., & André, J. (2021). Risk-Seeking or Impatient? Disentangling Variance and Time in Hazardous Behaviors. Evolution and Human Behavior, 42, 453-460.[CrossRef] 
[21] Bowlby, J. (1951). Maternal Care and Mental Health (Vol. 2). World Health Organization.
[22] Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., Piccolo, R. F., Zapata, C. P., & Rich, B. L. (2012). Explaining the Justice-Performance Relationship: Trust as Exchange Deepener or Trust as Uncertainty Reducer? Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 1-15.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] De Cremer, D., & Sedikides, C. (2009). The Whys and Whens of Personal Uncertainty. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 218-220.[CrossRef] 
[24] Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O’donoghue, T. (2002). Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 351-401.[CrossRef] 
[25] Ge, X. (2023). Experimentally Manipulating Mediating Processes: Why and How to Examine Mediation Using Statistical Moderation Analyses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 109, Article 104507.[CrossRef] 
[26] Hardisty, D. J., Appelt, K. C., & Weber, E. U. (2013). Good or Bad, We Want It Now: Fixed‐Cost Present Bias for Gains and Losses Explains Magnitude Asymmetries in Intertemporal Choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 348-361.[CrossRef] 
[27] Hartley, C. A., & Phelps, E. A. (2012). Anxiety and Decision-Making. Biological Psychiatry, 72, 113-118.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Hertenstein, M. J., Verkamp, J. M., Kerestes, A. M., & Holmes, R. M. (2006). The Communicative Functions of Touch in Humans, Nonhuman Primates, and Rats: A Review and Synthesis of the Empirical Research. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132, 5-94.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Ikeda, T., & Takeda, Y. (2024). Haptic Sensations Modulate Judgment of Words That Elicit Self‐Referent Memory. Japanese Psychological Research.[CrossRef] 
[30] Kidd, C., Palmeri, H., & Aslin, R. N. (2013). Rational Snacking: Young Children’s Decision-Making on the Marshmallow Task Is Moderated by Beliefs about Environmental Reliability. Cognition, 126, 109-114.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Kim, B. K., & Zauberman, G. (2013). Can Victoria’s Secret Change the Future? A Subjective Time Perception Account of Sexual-Cue Effects on Impatience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 328-335.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Kim, S., Hwang, J., & Lee, D. (2008). Prefrontal Coding of Temporally Discounted Values during Intertemporal Choice. Neuron, 59, 161-172.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Kirby, K. N., Petry, N. M., & Bickel, W. K. (1999). Heroin Addicts Have Higher Discount Rates for Delayed Rewards than Non-Drug-Using Controls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 78-87.[CrossRef] 
[34] Kyu Kim, B., Zauberman, G., & Bettman, J. R. (2012). Space, Time, and Intertemporal Preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 867-880.[CrossRef] 
[35] Levav, J., & Argo, J. J. (2010). Physical Contact and Financial Risk Taking. Psychological Science, 21, 804-810.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Mazur, J. E. (1984). Tests of an Equivalence Rule for Fixed and Variable Reinforcer Delays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 426-436.[CrossRef] 
[37] Rachlin, H., & Jones, B. A. (2008). Social Discounting and Delay Discounting. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 29-43.[CrossRef] 
[38] Read, D., Frederick, S., & Scholten, M. (2013). DRIFT: An Analysis of Outcome Framing in Intertemporal Choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 573-588.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Schaefer, M., Cherkasskiy, L., Denke, C., Spies, C., Song, H., Malahy, S. et al. (2018). Incidental Haptic Sensations Influence Judgment of Crimes. Scientific Reports, 8, Article No. 6039.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Sorrentino, R. M., Short, J. C., & Raynor, J. O. (1984). Uncertainty Orientation: Implications for Affective and Cognitive Views of Achievement Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 189-206.[CrossRef] 
[41] Spackman, J. S., & Yanchar, S. C. (2014). Embodied Cognition, Representationalism, and Mechanism: A Review and Analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 44, 46-79.[CrossRef] 
[42] Stanley Budner, N. Y. (1962). Intolerance of Ambiguity as a Personality Variable1. Journal of Personality, 30, 29-50.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] Strack, F. (2013). The Different Routes to Social Judgments: Experiential versus Informational Strategies. In L. L. Martin, & A. Tesser (Eds.), The Construction of Social Judgments (pp. 249-275). Psychology Press.
[44] Van Horen, F., & Mussweiler, T. (2014). Soft Assurance: Coping with Uncertainty through Haptic Sensations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 73-80.[CrossRef] 
[45] Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.[CrossRef]