游戏化示能性如何驱动个人低碳行为?——基于蚂蚁森林用户的问卷研究
How Does Gamification Drive Individual Low-Carbon Behavior? —Based on a Questionnaire Study of Ant Forest Users
摘要: 随着游戏化应用的日益发展,游戏化元素的设计如何影响消费者低碳行为的研究愈加受到营销学者的关注。绿色环保App使用率的提升,成为推动线上环保活动和绿色生活方式的有力工具。已有研究表明游戏化元素的加入对居民低碳行为有助推作用,但并没有深入理解游戏化设计如何激发游戏化示能性并进而影响低碳行为的内在机制。为了填补这一空白,该研究以国内最具影响力的在线环保应用“蚂蚁森林”为例,通过扩展游戏化示能性理论和目标框架理论,探索消费者低碳行为的驱动因素。结果表明,游戏示能性是蚂蚁森林用户践行低碳行为的重要心理来源。本研究为电商平台如何进行游戏化设计更好激发游戏化示能性对低碳行为的驱动作用提供参考。
Abstract: With the increasing development of gamification applications, the research on how the design of gamification elements affects consumers’ low-carbon behaviors has attracted more and more attention from marketing scholars. The increase in the use of green apps has become a powerful tool to promote online environmental protection activities and green lifestyles. Previous studies have shown that the addition of gamification elements can promote residents’ low-carbon behavior, but there is no deep understanding of how gamification design stimulates gamification and then affects the internal mechanism of low-carbon behavior. In order to fill this gap, this study takes Ant Forest, the most influential online environmental protection application in China, as an example, and explores the driving factors of consumers’ low-carbon behavior by extending the gamification energy demonstration theory and the target framework theory. The results show that game energy performance is an important psychological source for Ant Forest users to practice low-carbon behavior. This study provides a reference for how e-commerce platforms can better stimulate the driving effect of gamification on low-carbon behaviors by gamification design.
文章引用:黄月美, 贾兴平. 游戏化示能性如何驱动个人低碳行为?——基于蚂蚁森林用户的问卷研究[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2025, 14(4): 346-356. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2025.144298

参考文献

[1] Massarutto, A., Marangon, F., Troiano, S. and Favot, M. (2019) Moral Duty, Warm Glow or Self-Interest? A Choice Experiment Study on Motivations for Domestic Garbage Sorting in Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 916-923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Gilg, A., Barr, S. and Ford, N. (2005) Green Consumption or Sustainable Lifestyles? Identifying the Sustainable Consumer. Futures, 37, 481-504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Sawhney, M., Verona, G. and Prandelli, E. (2005) Collaborating to Create: The Internet as a Platform for Customer Engagement in Product Innovation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19, 4-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Mi, L., Xu, T., Sun, Y., Zhao, J., Lv, T., Gan, X., et al. (2021) Playing Ant Forest to Promote Online Green Behavior: A New Perspective on Uses and Gratifications. Journal of Environmental Management, 278, Article ID: 111544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Liu, D., Santhanam, R. and Webster, J. (2017) Toward Meaningful Engagement: A Framework for Design and Research of Gamified Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 41, 1011-1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Tobon, S., Ruiz-Alba, J.L. and García-Madariaga, J. (2020) Gamification and Online Consumer Decisions: Is the Game Over? Decision Support Systems, 128, Article ID: 113167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 柯晓波. 绿色信息系统中游戏化示能性促进用户亲环境行为研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 广东工业大学, 2018.
[8] Nicholson, S. (2013) Two Paths to Motivation through Game Design Elements: Reward-Based Gamification and Meaningful Gamification. Proceedings of iConference, Fort Worth, 12-15 February 2013, 671-672.
[9] Hamari, J. and Koivisto, J. (2015) “Working Out for Likes”: An Empirical Study on Social Influence in Exercise Gamification. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 333-347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Zhou, F., Lin, Y. and Mou, J. (2023) Unpacking the Effect of Gamified Virtual CSR Cocreated on Users’ Pro-Environmental Behavior: A Holistic View of Gamification Affordance. Technology in Society, 73, Article ID: 102228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Gibson, J.J. (2015) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton, Mifflin and Company.
[12] Norman, D. (1998) Invisible Computer: Why Good Products Can Fail, the Personal Computer Is So Complex, and Information Appliances Are the Solution. MIT Press.
[13] Evans, S.K., Pearce, K.E., Vitak, J. and Treem, J.W. (2016) Explicating Affordances: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Affordances in Communication Research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22, 35-52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 常亮, 张嘉芮, 陈倩. 数字时代游戏化示能性对绿色消费行为的影响[J]. 商业经济研究, 2023(20): 47-52.
[15] 李雨欣, 陈艳红. 移动购物App中游戏化示能性对用户持续使用意愿的影响研究[J]. 现代商业, 2024(9): 43-47.【16】
[16] Cheng, X., Wu, F., Li, W., Yang, J. and Long, R. (2024) What Maintains Low-Carbon Consumption Behaviors: Evidence from China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 189, Article ID: 114050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Steg, L. and Vlek, C. (2009) Encouraging Pro-Environmental Behaviour: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309-317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Wang, T., Shen, B., Han Springer, C. and Hou, J. (2021) What Prevents Us from Taking Low-Carbon Actions? A Comprehensive Review of Influencing Factors Affecting Low-Carbon Behaviors. Energy Research & Social Science, 71, Article ID: 101844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Gössling, S. and Buckley, R. (2016) Carbon Labels in Tourism: Persuasive Communication? Journal of Cleaner Production, 111, 358-369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Yue, T., Long, R. and Chen, H. (2013) Factors Influencing Energy-Saving Behavior of Urban Households in Jiangsu Province. Energy Policy, 62, 665-675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Zhao, R. and Zhong, S. (2015) Carbon Labelling Influences on Consumers’ Behaviour: A System Dynamics Approach. Ecological Indicators, 51, 98-106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Xu, Z., Wang, Y., Teng, Z., Zhong, C. and Teng, H. (2015) Low-carbon Product Multi-Objective Optimization Design for Meeting Requirements of Enterprise, User and Government. Journal of Cleaner Production, 103, 747-758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Lindenberg, S., Steg, L., Milovanovic, M. and Schipper, A. (2018) Moral Hypocrisy and the Hedonic Shift: A Goal-Framing Approach. Rationality and Society, 30, 393-419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Steg, L., Bolderdijk, J.W., Keizer, K. and Perlaviciute, G. (2014) An Integrated Framework for Encouraging Pro-Environmental Behaviour: The Role of Values, Situational Factors and Goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 104-115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Camerer, C.F. (2011) Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton University Press.
[26] 杜松华, 徐嘉泓, 张德鹏, 等. 游戏化如何驱动电商用户绿色消费行为——基于蚂蚁森林的网络民族志研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2022, 25(2): 191-204
[27] van Roy, R. and Zaman, B. (2018) Need-Supporting Gamification in Education: An Assessment of Motivational Effects over Time. Computers & Education, 127, 283-297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Huang, L. and Yeh, Y. (2017) Meaningful Gamification for Journalism Students to Enhance Their Critical Thinking Skills. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 7, 47-62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] Thiebes, S., Lins, S. and Basten, D. (2014) Gamifying Information Systems—A Synthesis of Gamification Mechanics and Dynamics. ECIS.
[30] Ali-Hassan, H., Nevo, D. and Wade, M. (2015) Linking Dimensions of Social Media Use to Job Performance: The Role of Social Capital. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24, 65-89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] Wakefield, R.L., Wakefield, K.L., Baker, J. and Wang, L.C. (2011) How Website Socialness Leads to Website Use. European Journal of Information Systems, 20, 118-132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Rogers, R. (2017) The Motivational Pull of Video Game Feedback, Rules, and Social Interaction: Another Self-Determination Theory Approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 446-450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[33] Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R. (1992) Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1111-1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[34] Perrini, F. (2006) Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause. Wiley.
[35] Lindenberg, S. (1983) Utility and Morality. Kyklos, 36, 450-468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[36] Stern, P.C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., et al. (1999) A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 1, 81-97.
[37] Wang, X. and Yao, X. (2020) Fueling Pro-Environmental Behaviors with Gamification Design: Identifying Key Elements in Ant Forest with the Kano Model. Sustainability, 12, Article 2213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[38] Lee, K. (2008) Opportunities for Green Marketing: Young Consumers. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 26, 573-586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[39] Moon, J. and Kim, Y. (2001) Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web Context. Information & Management, 38, 217-230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[40] Gallego, M.D., Bueno, S. and Noyes, J. (2016) Second Life Adoption in Education: A Motivational Model Based on Uses and Gratifications Theory. Computers & Education, 100, 81-93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[41] 梅蕾, 孙立峰, 李文, 等. 碳标签对低碳购买意愿的作用路径研究——基于亲社会行为调节的中介效应[J]. 中国环境管理, 2023, 15(5): 117-128.