在微创吸刮术中应用刨针或钝针治疗腋臭的临床疗效分析
Clinical Efficacy Analysis of Aspiration Scraper Cannula or Blunt Aspiration Cannula Techniques in Minimally Invasive Aspiration Curettage for Axillary Osmidrosis
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2025.1541217, PDF,   
作者: 沙 桐*:承德医学院研究生学院,河北 承德;何洪彬#:秦皇岛市第一医院医学美容科,河北 秦皇岛
关键词: 腋臭微创吸刮术刨针顶泌汗腺Axillary Osmidrosis Minimally Invasive Aspiration Curettage Aspiration Scraper Cannula Apocrine Sweat Gland
摘要: 目的:比较在微创吸刮术中应用刨针与应用钝针治疗腋臭的临床疗效。方法:收集2021年8月至2023年8月于秦皇岛市第一医院医学美容科收治的91例腋臭患者为研究对象,根据术中使用吸脂针类型的不同,分为刨针组(42例)和钝针组(49例)。比较两组的术后效果、手术耗时及术后并发症的发生情况。结果:两组术后治愈率比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);刨针组术后显效率明显高于钝针组,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05);两组术后有效率比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);刨针组手术平均耗时明显短于钝针组(P < 0.05);两组术后并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:在微创吸刮术中无论是应用刨针还是应用钝针,对于Park分级为2或3级腋臭的治疗都有显著的效果。相比于应用钝针,应用刨针的微创吸刮术治疗效率更高、手术耗时更短且术后并发症发生率没有增加,是临床上治疗腋臭更好的选择。
Abstract: Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of aspiration scraper cannula and blunt aspiration cannula in minimally invasive aspiration curettage for axillary osmidrosis. Methods: Ninety-one patients with axillary osmidrosis admitted to the Department of Medical Cosmetology of the First Hospital of Qinhuangdao from August 2021 to August 2023 were divided into two groups according to the types of liposuction cannulas used during operation: aspiration scraper cannula group (n = 42) and blunt aspiration cannula group (n = 49). The postoperative effect, operation time and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results: There was no significant difference in the postoperative cure rate between the two groups (P > 0.05); the postoperative significant rate in the aspiration scraper cannula group was significantly higher than that in the blunt aspiration cannula group, and the difference had statistical significance (P < 0.05); there was no significant difference in the postoperative effective rate between the two groups (P > 0.05); the average operation time in the aspiration scraper cannula group was significantly shorter than that in the blunt aspiration cannula group (P < 0.05); there was no significant difference in the incidence rate of postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Both aspiration scraper cannula and blunt aspiration cannula are effective in minimally invasive aspiration curettage for the treatment of Park grade 2 or 3 axillary osmidrosis. Compared with blunt aspiration cannula, minimally invasive aspiration curettage with aspiration scraper cannula has higher significant efficiency, shorter operation time and no increased incidence rate of postoperative complications, which is a better choice for the treatment of axillary osmidrosis in clinical practice.
文章引用:沙桐, 何洪彬. 在微创吸刮术中应用刨针或钝针治疗腋臭的临床疗效分析[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(4): 2589-2596. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.1541217

参考文献

[1] 陈强, 李薇薇, 汤洁莹, 等. 小切口吸脂针刮吸法治疗轻中度腋臭效果探讨[J]. 中国美容医学, 2020, 29(10): 72-74.
[2] 车静, 佘金铭, 陈聪颖, 等. 微创负压抽吸术与小切口汗腺切除术治疗腋臭的疗效分析[J]. 中国美容整形外科杂志, 2021, 32(1): 46-48.
[3] Park, Y. and Shin, M. (2001) What Is the Best Method for Treating Osmidrosis? Annals of Plastic Surgery, 47, 303-309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] 张秋蕊, 赵晓琼, 高飞, 等. 腋臭的发病机制及治疗进展[J]. 皮肤病与性病, 2023, 45(2): 124-128.
[5] 田小磊, 周荣新, 高凤, 等. 腋臭外科手术治疗概况[J]. 临床皮肤科杂志, 2023, 52(10): 633-637.
[6] 冯钤, 曾琪, 李小林. 腋臭注射治疗的研究进展[J]. 中国美容整形外科杂志, 2023, 34(5): 317-318.
[7] 豆舒乾, 杨一飞, 苗晓燕, 等. 不同方法治疗腋臭有效率的网状荟萃分析[J]. 中国美容医学, 2021, 30(6): 17-22.
[8] 梅小霞, 刘文飞, 杨思奋. 腋臭的优化治疗研究进展[J]. 感染、炎症、修复, 2020, 21(1): 55-57.
[9] 嵇佳颖, 汪正财, 谈伟强. 腋臭治疗方法的研究进展[J]. 中国医疗美容, 2022, 12(12): 59-62.
[10] 郑思齐, 黄晓雯, 郑跃. 肉毒素注射在手足多汗症及腋臭治疗的应用新进展[J]. 皮肤科学通报, 2024, 41(4): 357-365.
[11] 唐武锋, 黎超伟, 曾洲平. A型肉毒毒素注射治疗腋臭的临床效果及复发情况[J]. 海峡药学, 2021, 33(5): 138-139.
[12] 吴慧敏, 赵雅羚, 李小林, 等. 芍倍注射液治疗腋臭的临床疗效研究[J]. 中国医疗美容, 2024, 14(4): 28-30.
[13] Li, Y., Huang, Z., Ran, L., Wang, W., Yu, X. and Wang, R. (2020) A Retrospective Study on Comparing the Surgery and Microneedles Radiofrequency and Microwaves Treatment in Axillary Osmidrosis. Journal of Dermatological Treatment, 33, 420-426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] 邹奔, 高崧瀛, 焉伟杰, 等. 黄金微针射频法与微创搔刮法腋臭根治术治疗腋臭的疗效对比[J]. 中国美容医学, 2022, 31(11): 27-30.
[15] 杨乐, 贺光照. 激光治疗腋臭研究进展[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2017, 33(6): 844-847.
[16] Chen, Y., Shih, P., Chen, H. and Chen, T. (2015) Treatment of Axillary Osmidrosis: A Comparison between Subcutaneous Laser and Superficial Liposuction Curettage. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 29, 2019-2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] 彭海峰. 三种腋臭治疗方式的对比分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 芜湖: 皖南医学院, 2023.
[18] Sun, P.F., et al. (2019) The Treatment of Axillary Odor: A Network Meta-Analysis. Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research, 25, 2735-2744.
[19] 胡尧, 江连枝. 小切口汗腺切除术和微创负压抽吸术治疗腋臭患者的效果对比[J]. 中国医学创新, 2023, 20(24): 118-121.
[20] 黄莎, 王萃. 微创改良抽吸术治疗腋臭的效果观察[J]. 现代实用医学, 2018, 30(11): 1489-1491.
[21] 李春红, 邓新华, 谈桂其, 等. 392例负压抽脂微创治疗腋臭疗效分析[J]. 皮肤性病诊疗学杂志, 2021, 28(2): 114-116.