审计风险关系局限性与其评估模型改进研究
Research on the Limitations of Audit Risk Relationship and the Improvement of Its Evaluation Model
DOI: 10.12677/fia.2025.142066, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 徐雪婵, 王树锋*:泉州职业技术大学商学院,福建 泉州
关键词: 全要素审计风险审计风险关系模型审计报告风险Total Factor Audit Risk Audit Risk Relationship Model Audit Report Risk
摘要: 数字经济时代,企业经营管理与会计核算,普遍借助互联网和软件应用工具。财务机器人运用智能化的程序进行业务核算处理,在提高企业信息核算质量与效率的同时,也出现了传输信息数据真实性鉴别和会计错弊手段隐蔽性更强的新问题,无形中给审计检查鉴证带来巨大的风险挑战。传统的审计风险要素认知具有其历史局限性,并直接影响到审计风险评估的系统性和正确性。为此,文章采用逻辑演绎法、判断推理法和对比分析法等,在分析国内外研究状况基础上,介绍了全要素审计风险识别与评估模型设立的客观依据,阐明了现行审计风险关系模型及其应用的局限性,基于审计程序的各工作环节,探索了全要素审计风险识别及其关系表达式,重点研究重塑了审计风险评估应用的审计风险关系模型,并提出应用要求。
Abstract: In the era of digital economy, business management and accounting generally rely on the Internet and software application tools. Financial robots use intelligent programs for business accounting processing, which not only improves the quality and efficiency of enterprise information accounting, but also presents new problems such as authenticity identification of transmitted information data and stronger concealment of accounting errors and fraud methods, which invisibly brings huge risk challenges to audit inspection and verification. The traditional understanding of audit risk factors has its historical limitations and directly affects the systematicity and correctness of audit risk assessment. Therefore, the article adopts logical deduction, judgment reasoning, comparative analysis methods, and literature research method, etc. On the basis of analyzing the research status at home and abroad, it introduces the objective basis for the establishment of the all factor audit risk identification and evaluation model, clarifies the limitations of the current audit risk relationship model and its application, explores the all factor audit risk identification and its relationship expression based on various work stages of the audit procedure, focuses on reshaping the audit risk relationship model for audit risk assessment application, and puts forward application requirements.
文章引用:徐雪婵, 王树锋. 审计风险关系局限性与其评估模型改进研究[J]. 国际会计前沿, 2025, 14(2): 567-577. https://doi.org/10.12677/fia.2025.142066

参考文献

[1] 陈嘉琦. 全流程化现代审计风险关系模型改进研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 大庆: 黑龙江八一农垦大学, 2023.
[2] Johnstone, K.M. (2000) Client-Acceptance Decisions: Simultaneous Effects of Client Business Risk, Audit Risk, Auditor Business Risk, and Risk Adaptation. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19, 1-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Bedard, J.C. and Johnstone, K.M. (2004) Earnings Manipulation Risk, Corporate Governance Risk, and Auditors’ Planning and Pricing Decisions. The Accounting Review, 79, 277-304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Mitra, S., Song, H., Lee, S.M. and Kwon, S.H. (2019) CEO Tenure and Audit Pricing. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 55, 427-459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 包建玲, 刘玥彤. 熵权视域下大数据审计风险的估计及控制研究[J]. 财会通讯, 2023(1): 109-115.
[6] 陈丽英, 李婉丽. 错报风险、法律环境与重述可靠性[J]. 审计与经济研究, 2018, 33(3): 83-93.
[7] 刘振华, 张长江. 审计重大错报风险的测度及预警研究——基于OWA算子和云模型[J]. 财会通讯, 2020(3): 129-133.
[8] Mock, T.J., Srivastava, R.P. and Wright, A.M. (2017) Fraud Risk Assessment Using the Fraud Risk Model as a Decision Aid. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 14, 37-56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 郭丹. 审计风险关系模型中检查风险影响因素的分层[J]. 财会月刊, 2010(12): 72-73.
[10] 辛旭. 审计检查风险: 识别与防范[J]. 会计师, 2021(8): 75-76.
[11] 段珺. P2P审计风险的识别与应对[J]. 财会通讯, 2018(19): 90-93.
[12] Appelbaum, D., Kogan, A. and Vasarhelyi, M.A. (2017) Big Data and Analytics in the Modern Audit Engagement: Research Needs. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 36, 1-27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 王树锋, 刘仁瑞. 独立审计报告撰写与使用之风险控制研究[J]. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报, 2012, 24(3): 75-79.
[14] 房敏鹰, 王树锋, 顾爱春. 如何撰写规范的审计报告[J]. 财务与会计, 2012(8): 70-71.
[15] 余玉苗, 刘颖雯. 注册会计师审计定价模型中的风险溢价及其内在化研究[J]. 会计研究, 2005(3): 16-21.
[16] He, C., Li, C.K., Monroe, G.S. and Si, Y. (2021) Diversity of Signing Auditors and Audit Quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 40, 27-52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef