1351例小于胎龄儿在(校正) 6~24月龄神经发育轨迹
Neurodevelopmental Trajectories of 1351 Small for Gestational Age Infants at (Corrected) 6~24 Months of Age
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2025.1551571, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 谭 然, 刘 畅:暨南大学附属第一医院儿科,广东 广州;马丽亚*, 吕 倩, 丁碧蓝, 肖万祥:深圳市宝安区妇幼保健院发育行为儿科,广东 深圳
关键词: 小于胎龄儿发育商神经发育轨迹Small for Gestational Age Infants Developmental Quotient Neurodevelopmental Trajectories
摘要: 目的:探讨小于胎龄儿(small for gestational age, SGA)(校正) 6~24月龄神经心理发育轨迹。方法:收集2018年4月至2023年12月在深圳市宝安区妇幼保健院高危儿随访门诊定期随访的1351例(校正) 6~24月龄SGA儿童随访期间资料,采用《中国0~6岁儿童神经心理行为检查量表(2016版)》评估神经心理发育水平,根据出生胎龄将SGA分为足月儿组、低危早产儿组和高危早产儿组,调查不同胎龄SGA儿童发育商(developmental quotient, DQ)水平并绘制神经发育曲线。结果:各胎龄组SGA的大运动DQ均随月龄增加而上升(P均<0.001),足月SGA除大运动DQ随时间有提高外(P < 0.001),其他各能区DQ及总DQ均随时间而下降(P均<0.001)。低危早产SGA的适应能力DQ随月龄增高而升高(P均<0.001),精细运动、语言和社会行为能区DQ及总DQ随月龄显著下降(P < 0.001)。高危早产SGA除大运动外,其他各能区指标与月龄变化无显著关系(P均>0.05),精细运动能区DQ一直处于临界偏低状态。在(校正) 6~17月龄,SGA总DQ随着胎龄下降而降低(P均<0.001),到(校正) 18~24月龄时,低危早产SGA总DQ及其他各能区DQ均与足月SGA无统计学差异(P均>0.05),而高危早产SGA的总DQ和大运动、精细运动、适应能力DQ均落后于足月SGA (P均<0.05),大运动DQ落后于低危早产SGA (P = 0.049)。结论:大运动能区为SGA的优势能区;足月和低危早产SGA总DQ随月龄增高而下降,高危早产SGA的总DQ虽然保持稳定,但整体处于较低水平,应加强对34周以下SGA的神经发育管理。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the neuropsychological developmental trajectory of small for gestational age (SGA) infants during (corrected) 6~24 months of age. Methods: Data were collected during the follow-up period of 1351 cases (corrected) of SGA infants aged 6~24 months who were regularly followed up at the high-risk infant follow-up clinic of Shenzhen Baoan Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Shenzhen, China, from April 2018 to December 2023. Neuropsychological Behavioral Examination Scale for Children 0~6 Years of Age (2016 version) was used to assess the level of neuropsychological development. SGA infants were categorized into full-term, low-risk preterm and high-risk preterm groups according to birth gestational age. The developmental quotient (DQ) levels of SGA infants of different gestational ages were investigated and neurodevelopmental curves were drawn. Results: With the increase of age, DQ values of gross motor in all gestational age groups increased (P < 0.001). Except for the gross motor domain, values of total DQ and other domains in the full-term SGA group were decreased (P < 0.001). DQ values of adaptive ability in low-risk preterm SGA increased with age (P < 0.001), while the fine motor, language and social behavior domains and total DQ decreased (P < 0.001). High-risk preterm SGA infants showed no significant developmental changes across domains (P > 0.05) except for gross motor skills, with the fine motor domain DQ persistently remaining at borderline-low levels. The values of total DQ decreased with the decrease of gestational age during (corrected) 6~17 months of age (P < 0.001). At (corrected) 18~24 months of age, the values of total DQ and each domain DQ between low-risk preterm and full-term SGA infants had no statistical difference (P > 0.05). The total DQ and DQs of gross motor, fine motor and adaptive ability in high-risk preterm SGA infants were all lower than those of full-term SGA infants (P < 0.05), and gross motor DQ was lower than those of low-risk preterm SGA (P = 0.049). Conclusions: The gross motor domain is the predominant developmental area in SGA infants. The total DQ of full-term and low-risk preterm SGA declined with increasing months of age, and the total DQ of high-risk preterm SGA infants remained stable but was at an overall low level, and neurodevelopmental management should be strengthened for SGA below 34 weeks.
文章引用:谭然, 马丽亚, 刘畅, 吕倩, 丁碧蓝, 肖万祥. 1351例小于胎龄儿在(校正) 6~24月龄神经发育轨迹[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(5): 1887-1893. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.1551571

参考文献

[1] Hokken-Koelega, A.C.S., van der Steen, M., Boguszewski, M.C.S., Cianfarani, S., Dahlgren, J., Horikawa, R., et al. (2023) International Consensus Guideline on Small for Gestational Age: Etiology and Management from Infancy to Early Adulthood. Endocrine Reviews, 44, 539-565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Østgård, H.F., Løhaugen, G.C.C., Bjuland, K.J., Rimol, L.M., Brubakk, A., Martinussen, M., et al. (2014) Brain Morphometry and Cognition in Young Adults Born Small for Gestational Age at Term. The Journal of Pediatrics, 165, 921-927.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Andescavage, N., duPlessis, A., Metzler, M., Bulas, D., Vezina, G., Jacobs, M., et al. (2017) In Vivo Assessment of Placental and Brain Volumes in Growth-Restricted Fetuses with and without Fetal Doppler Changes Using Quantitative 3D MRI. Journal of Perinatology, 37, 1278-1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] 王晓庆, 刘九月, 姚光. 小于胎龄儿早期脑发育及18-24月龄时神经发育状况的前瞻性队列研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 353-358.
[5] Eves, R., Mendonça, M., Bartmann, P. and Wolke, D. (2020) Small for Gestational Age—Cognitive Performance from Infancy to Adulthood: An Observational Study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 127, 1598-1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 国家卫生计生委办公厅关于印发早产儿保健工作规范的通知[J]. 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会公报, 2017(2): 101-110.
[7] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 0岁-6岁儿童发育行为评估量表(WS/T 580-2017) [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
[8] Anderson, P.J., Treyvaud, K., Neil, J.J., Cheong, J.L.Y., Hunt, R.W., Thompson, D.K., et al. (2017) Associations of Newborn Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Long-Term Neurodevelopmental Impairments in Very Preterm Children. The Journal of Pediatrics, 187, 58-65.E1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Pierrat, V., Marchand-Martin, L., Arnaud, C., Kaminski, M., Resche-Rigon, M., Lebeaux, C., et al. (2017) Neurodevelopmental Outcome at 2 Years for Preterm Children Born at 22 to 34 Weeks’ Gestation in France in 2011: EPIPAGE-2 Cohort Study. BMJ, 358, j3448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] 尤玉慧, 吕国卿, 姜秀芳, 等. 出生胎龄与小于胎龄儿智能发育的相关性分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2020, 35(4): 669-673.
[11] 金志培, 陈乐乐. 支气管肺发育不良对早产儿神经发育的影响[J]. 浙江实用医学, 2023, 28(5): 379-382.
[12] 牛冬春. 早产儿肺功能与神经行为发育关系的初步探讨[J]. 中国实用医药, 2015, 10(19): 79-80.
[13] 张紫祎, 肖万祥, 马丽亚, 等. 早产儿校正18-24月龄体格生长和神经发育水平研究[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2023, 25(1): 25-30.
[14] Li, S., Tsao, P., Tu, Y., Hsieh, W., Yao, N., Wu, Y., et al. (2022) Cognitive and Motor Development in Preterm Children from 6 to 36 Months of Age: Trajectories, Risk Factors and Predictability. Early Human Development, 172, Article 105634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] 尤嘉, 王素卿, 王瑾. 早产、低出生体重儿神经心理行为发育的监测[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2016, 24(6): 662-664.
[16] Alijanzadeh, M., RajabiMajd, N., RezaeiNiaraki, M., Griffiths, M.D. and Alimoradi, Z. (2024) Prevalence and Socio-Economic Determinants of Growth and Developmental Delays among Iranian Children Aged under Five Years: A Cross Sectional Study. BMC Pediatrics, 24, Article No. 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] 房雨如, 孟秋彤, 单延春, 等. 小于胎龄儿学龄前期神经认知功能发育研究[J/OL]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2025: 1-6.
http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/61.1346.R.20250115.1416.018.html, 2025-05-23.
[18] Yu, W., Wang, S., Chen, L., Lin, Y. and Huang, C. (2022) Effect of First-Month Head-Size Growth Trajectory on Cognitive Outcomes in Preterm Infants. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 121, 367-374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] González, L., Popovic, M., Rebagliato, M., Estarlich, M., Moirano, G., Barreto-Zarza, F., et al. (2024) Socioeconomic Position, Family Context, and Child Cognitive Development. European Journal of Pediatrics, 183, 2571-2585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] 邓智, 罗先琼. 小于胎龄儿的生长发育现状及研究进展[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志, 2019, 34(14): 1105-1108.