互市传统与数字未来:茶马法制对跨境数据贸易规则的再造启示
Mutual Market Traditions and the Digital Future: Implications of the Chama Legal System for the Reinvention of Cross-Border Data Trade Rules
DOI: 10.12677/ds.2025.116198, PDF,   
作者: 朱钒珲:西南民族大学法学院,四川 成都
关键词: 数字茶马互市茶引Digital Tea-Horse Exchange Market Tea Citation
摘要: 本研究致力于探索中华传统茶马互市法制对重构跨境数字贸易规则的范式启示,通过跨文明法律对话揭示非西方治理智慧的当代价值。系统解析茶马互市中动态平衡、信用建构及文化认同三大核心机制,将其与数字时代的数据权利博弈、算法伦理困境及文化合规挑战进行深层耦合。研究提出三大转化路径:借鉴“茶引”管控逻辑设计分级数据开放制度,依托“茶马古道”文化共识形成数字丝绸之路规则标准。通过建构“理念–机制–技术”三维移植模型,论证传统制度在现代数字治理场域中的适应性适用规律。研究突破实证主义范式局限,创建性提出“文明互鉴型规则再生产”理论框架,为破解数字贸易治理中的文明冲突提供东方方案。
Abstract: This study is dedicated to exploring the paradigm revelation of the traditional Chinese tea-horse exchange market legal system on reconstructing the rules of cross-border digital trade, and revealing the contemporary value of non-Western governance wisdom through cross-civilization legal dialogue. The study systematically analyzes the three core mechanisms of dynamic equilibrium, credit construction and cultural identity in the tea-horse exchange market, and deeply couples them with the data power game, algorithmic ethical dilemma and cultural compliance challenges in the digital era. The study proposes three transformation paths: designing a hierarchical data opening system based on the control logic of the “Tea Citation”, and forming the rules and standards of the Digital Silk Road based on the cultural consensus of the “Ancient Tea Horse Road”. By constructing a three-dimensional transplantation model of “concept-mechanism-technology”, the study demonstrates the adaptability of the traditional system in the modern digital governance field. The study breaks through the limitations of the positivism paradigm and creatively puts forward the theoretical framework of “rules reproduction based on mutual understanding of civilizations”, which provides an oriental solution for solving the clash of civilizations in digital trade governance.
文章引用:朱钒珲. 互市传统与数字未来:茶马法制对跨境数据贸易规则的再造启示[J]. 争议解决, 2025, 11(6): 61-67. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2025.116198

参考文献

[1] 张中秋. 传统中国法理观[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2019: 45-68.
[2] 侯文昌. 敦煌民族契约文书研究[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2015: 112-135.
[3] [日]滨下武志. 近代中国的国际契机: 朝贡贸易体系与近代亚洲经济圈[M]. 朱荫贵, 欧阳菲, 译. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 1999: 89-104.
[4] 明实录·茶马志[M]. 北京: 中国书店出版社, 2015.
[5] A·麦克唐纳. 敦煌吐蕃历史文书考释[M]. 青海: 青海人民出版社, 2010.
[6] 史记·五宗世家[M]. 长沙: 岳麓书社, 2016.
[7] 吴雨. 中国古代茶文化[M]. 北京: 中国商业出版社, 2022: 120-125.
[8] 陈崇凯, 王建林. 藏汉经济文化交流史[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2015: 553-557.
[9] 杨小敏. 蔡京盐法改革与北宋中央财政集权[J]. 中州学刊, 2021(3): 119-125.
[10] 胡铁球. “歇家牙行”经营模式的形成与演变[J]. 历史研究, 2007(3): 88-106.
[11] 童光政. 明律“私充牙行埠头”条的创立及其适用[J]. 法学研究, 2004, 26(2): 116-125.
[12] 凌文锋, 罗招武, 木霁弘. 茶马古道研究综述[J]. 云南社会科学, 2018(3): 97-106+187.
[13] 杨海潮. 茶马古道: 地方性的民间视角[J]. 思想战线, 2016, 42(6): 103-108.
[14] 李文杰. 论道家茶礼之文化内涵[J]. 农业考古, 2008(5): 40-43.
[15] 关剑平. 茶与中国文化[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2001: 352.
[16] 陈红波. 周国富全面系统阐述“清、敬、和、美”当代茶文化核心理念[J]. 茶博览, 2013(11): 12-19.
[17] 叶玉梅. 明代茶马互市中的金牌信符制度[J]. 青海民族学院学报, 1993, 29(4): 71-73.
[18] 蓝图. 明代汉籍记录甘青藏族部落与茶马贸易的联系[J]. 中国藏学, 2024(2): 72-84+214-215.