平台企业在政策环境变化中的适应与挑战——以美团为例
Adaptation and Challenges of Platform Enterprises in the Changing Policy Environment—Taking Meituan as an Example
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2025.1461864, PDF,   
作者: 黄 诺:上海工程技术大学管理学院,上海
关键词: 美团社保政策灵活就业平台经济Meituan Social Security Policy Flexible Employment Platform Economy
摘要: 在国家强化平台用工治理、完善新就业形态劳动者社会保障制度的背景下,平台企业面临新的政策压力与转型挑战。本文以美团为案例,采用定性分析方法,梳理我国平台社保政策的演变逻辑,分析美团在社保制度调整过程中的组织响应路径,探讨其在制度压力下的现实困境。研究发现,美团在政策驱动下逐步探索职业伤害保障、推进稳定骑手参保计划,初步展现出组织适应能力;但与此同时,其策略推进仍面临高成本负担、用工模式与制度不匹配、三方责任不清等多重障碍。本文认为,平台企业的策略调整不仅是对政策的被动响应,更是在政策与市场之间的动态博弈过程。为推动平台治理向更加规范、公平方向发展,需在政策制度和企业策略层面协同推进,形成可持续的保障机制与用工模式。
Abstract: Under the background of the state strengthening the governance of platform labor and improving the social security system for workers in new employment forms, platform enterprises face new policy pressure and transformation challenges. Taking Meituan as a case study, this paper adopts a qualitative analysis method to sort out the logic of the evolution of China’s platform social security policy, analyze Meituan’s organizational response path in the process of adjusting the social security system, and explore its real-life dilemma under the pressure of the system. The study finds that Meituan has gradually explored occupational injury protection and pushed forward the insurance plan for stable riders under the driving force of the policy, initially demonstrating its organizational adaptability; however, at the same time, the advancement of its strategy is still faced with multiple systemic obstacles such as the burden of high costs, mismatch between the employment model and the system, and unclear responsibilities of the three parties. This paper argues that the strategic adjustment of platform enterprises is not only a passive response to the policy, but also a dynamic gaming process between the policy and the market. In order to promote the development of platform governance in the direction of more standardization and fairness, it is necessary to synergistically promote at the level of policy system and enterprise strategy, and to form a sustainable guarantee mechanism and employment mode.
文章引用:黄诺. 平台企业在政策环境变化中的适应与挑战——以美团为例[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(6): 1295-1303. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.1461864

参考文献

[1] 肖红军, 李平. 平台型企业社会责任的生态化治理[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(4): 120-144+196.
[2] 唐窗林. 算法管理下外卖骑手的数字劳动研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2022.
[3] Eisenmann, T., Parker, G.G. and Van Alstyne, M. (2006) Strategies for Two-Sided Markets. Harvard Business Review, 84, 92-101.
[4] 江小涓. 高度联通社会中的资源重组与服务业增长[J]. 经济研究, 2017, 52(3): 4-17.
[5] 戚聿东, 肖旭. 数字经济时代的企业管理变革[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(6): 135-152+250.
[6] 王文珍, 李文静. 平台经济发展对我国劳动关系的影响[J]. 中国劳动, 2017(1): 4-12.
[7] 肖海林, 薛琼. 制度同构与交易转型——企业为什么承担社会责任的一个新的理论解释[J]. 山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015, 38(1): 92-99.
[8] 陈兵. 因应超级平台对反垄断法规制的挑战[J]. 法学, 2020(2): 103-128.
[9] 刘乃梁, 潘盛龙. 平台经济治理中的行政约谈: 实践源流与优化向度[J]. 电子政务, 2023(7): 110-124.
[10] 崔淼, 周晓雪. 克服组织惯性: 数字化战略更新的实现及演进路径研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(10): 89-98.
[11] 肖红军. 共享价值式企业社会责任范式的反思与超越[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(5): 87-115+133.
[12] Teece, D.J. (2017) Dynamic Capabilities and (Digital) Platform Lifecycles. In: Advances in Strategic Management, Emerald Publishing Limited, 211-225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Howlett, M. (2009) Policy Analytical Capacity: The Supply and Demand for Policy Analysis in Government. Policy and Society, 28, 255-264.
[14] Edelman, L.B. (2016) Working Law. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Braithwaite, J. and Drahos, P. (2000) Global Business Regulation. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Hall, P.A. (1993) Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25, 275-296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 豪利特, 等. 公共政策研究: 政策循环与政策子系统[M]. 庞诗, 等, 译. 北京: 三联书店, 2006.
[18] Edelman, L.B. (2016) Working Law. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef