基于CiteSpace的我国持续创新的研究热点与展望

Research Hot Spots and Prospects of China’s Continuous Innovation Based on CiteSpace

摘要: 为系统梳理我国持续创新领域的研究热点与演进路径，本研究基于中国知网(CNKI) 2000~2024年管理学、经济学与工程技术领域的517篇核心期刊文献，运用CiteSpace工具进行文献计量与可视化分析。通过发文趋势、作者合作网络、机构分布及关键词共现、聚类、突现分析，揭示以下结论：我国持续创新研究发文量历经“起步积累–波动发展–调整深化–稳定拓展”四阶段，核心作者以向刚、段云龙为代表，南京大学商学院、云南财经大学国际工商学院等机构形成合作网络。研究热点聚焦“持续创新”“技术创新”“产业集群”等主题，演进脉络呈现“概念奠基(2000~2010)–拓展深化(2010~2020)–多元融合(2020后)”的阶段性特征，动态能力理论与知识生命周期理论为其提供理论支撑。当前研究存在新兴趋势响应滞后、跨学科整合不足及微观视角缺失等局限，未来需结合“双碳目标”“数字化转型”等现实需求，深化绿色创新、数字技术驱动的持续创新机制研究，推动理论与实践协同发展。本研究为学术界提供系统性知识图谱参考，并为政策优化与企业创新实践提供理论依据。

Abstract: In order to systematically sort out the research hotspots and evolution paths in the field of continuous innovation in China, this study is based on 517 core journals in the fields of management, economics, and engineering and technology in China Knowledge Network (CNKI) from 2000 to 2024, and the CiteSpace tool is used to carry out bibliometrics and visualization analysis. Through the analysis of publication trend, author cooperation network, institutional distribution and keyword co-occurrence, clustering and emergence, the following conclusions are revealed: the publication volume of China’s sustained innovation research has gone through four stages of “starting accumulation-fluctuating development-adjusting and deepening-stabilizing and expanding”. The core authors are represented by Xiang Gang and Duan Yunlong, and the cooperative network is formed by the Business School of Nanjing University and the International Business School of Yunnan University of Finance and Economics. The research hotspots focus on the themes of “continuous innovation”, “technological innovation”, “industrial clusters”, etc. The evolution is characterized by “conceptual foundation (2000~2010)-expansion and deepening (2010~2020)-diversification and integration (after 2020)”, with dynamic capability theory and knowledge life cycle theory providing theoretical support. The current research has limitations such as lagging response to emerging trends, insufficient interdisciplinary integration and lack of micro perspective. In the future, it is necessary to combine with the “dual-carbon target”, “digital transformation” and other real needs to deepen the research on green innovation and digital technology-driven sustained innovation mechanism, and to promote the synergistic development of theory and practice. In the future, it is necessary to deepen the research on sustainable innovation mechanism driven by green innovation and digital technology, and promote the synergistic development of theory and practice. This study provides a systematic knowledge mapping reference for academics and a theoretical basis for policy optimization and enterprise innovation practice.