建设工程中实际施工人优先受偿权研究
Research on the Priority Compensation Rights of Actual Constructors in Construction Engineering
DOI: 10.12677/ojls.2025.136165, PDF,   
作者: 胡健龙:深圳市天健(集团)股份有限公司,广东 深圳
关键词: 建设工程施工合同实际施工人优先受偿权Construction Contract Actual Constructors Priority Compensation Rights
摘要: 在建筑工程领域,实际施工人作为直接参与工程建设的主体,长期面临工程款拖欠导致的权益保障困境。本文以典型案例为切入点,结合司法解释与法律条文,系统探讨实际施工人优先受偿权的认定标准、法理基础及实践争议。研究表明实际施工人的认定需严格遵循“非法转包、违法分包”等无效合同链条下的核心要件;赋予其优先受偿权契合《民法典》保护弱势群体及维护市场稳定的立法初衷,但实践中仍存在裁判标准分歧、权利冲突(如消费者购房权优先性)、程序规则模糊等突出问题。对此,建议通过细化司法解释、统一司法裁判尺度、构建工程款支付担保机制等路径,完善实际施工人权益保障体系,推动建筑行业法治化与规范化发展,最终实现工程款高效清偿与社会公平正义的协同目标。
Abstract: In the field of construction engineering, actual constructors, as direct participants in project implementation, have long faced challenges in safeguarding their rights due to delayed payment of project funds. This article begins with a typical case study, combining judicial interpretations and legal provisions to systematically examine the identification criteria, legal foundations, and practical controversies surrounding the priority claim rights of actual constructors. The research demonstrates that the identification of actual constructors must strictly adhere to core requirements under invalid contractual chains such as “illegal subcontracting” and “unlawful apportionment.” Granting them priority claim rights aligns with the legislative intent of The Civil Code to protect vulnerable groups and maintain market stability. However, practical challenges persist, including divergent judicial standards, conflicts of rights (e.g., the precedence of consumer housing rights), and ambiguities in procedural rules. To address these issues, the article proposes refining judicial interpretations, unifying adjudication standards, and establishing project payment guarantee mechanisms to enhance the protection system for actual constructors. These measures aim to promote the rule of law and standardization in the construction industry, ultimately achieving the dual goals of efficient project fund settlement and social fairness and justice.
文章引用:胡健龙. 建设工程中实际施工人优先受偿权研究[J]. 法学, 2025, 13(6): 1163-1168. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2025.136165

参考文献

[1] 何睿. 建设工程价款优先受偿权相关法律问题研究[J]. 法人, 2025(1): 74-78.
[2] 赵伟方. 建设工程价款优先受偿权理论与实践研究[J]. 大陆桥视野, 2024(5): 58-60.
[3] 最高人民法院民事审判第一庭. 最高人民法院新建设工程施工合同司法解释(一)理解与适用[M]. 北京: 人民法院出版社, 2021: 392-393.
[4] 邬砚. 建设工程承包人对优先受偿权的处分自由论[J]. 求是学刊, 2024, 51(6): 110-122.
[5] 韩帅、赵腾远. 《民法典》背景下实际施工人权利保护问题研究[J]. 中国律师, 2022(1): 88-89.
[6] 最高人民法院民法典贯彻实施工作领导小组. 中华人民共和国民法典合同编理解与适用(一) [M]. 北京: 人民法院出版社, 2020: 502.
[7] 唐倩. 实际施工人的建设工程价款优先受偿权实证研究[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2019(4): 75-87, 207.
[8] 王玮玲. 合同无效时建设工程优先受偿权的教义学探析[J]. 法学论坛, 2020, 35(1): 97-105.
[9] 高印立. 实际施工人的代位权若干问题研究[J]. 商事仲裁与调解, 2021(2): 90-104.
[10] 杨劭禹. 实际施工人的优先受偿权之证成——以《建工司法解释一》第35条为中心[J]. 中国不动产法研究, 2021, 23(1): 289-311.
[11] 李建星. 《民法典》第807条(建工价款的优先受偿权)评注[J]. 南京大学学报2021, 58(4): 83-101, 162.
[12] 高印立. 论建设工程价款优先受偿权的清偿顺位[J]. 北京仲裁, 2021(1): 38-61.
[13] 宋会谱. 建设工程价款优先受偿权疑难问题研究[J]. 法律适用, 2021(6): 155-162.