数字经济领域反垄断“相关市场”的界定标准
The Definition Criteria for “Relevant Markets” in the Digital Economy Domain regarding Anti-Monopoly Measures
DOI: 10.12677/fia.2025.143089, PDF,   
作者: 赵艺霖:青岛科技大学法学院,山东 青岛
关键词: 数字经济相关市场界定反垄断法Digital Economy Definition of Relevant Markets Anti-Monopoly Law
摘要: 本文旨在探讨数字经济领域反垄断中“相关市场”的认定标准,随着数字经济的迅猛发展,数字平台及其相关市场的界定成为反垄断执法中的重要问题。文章首先回顾了传统反垄断理论中的“相关市场”概念,进而分析了数字经济领域“相关市场”界定的特殊性和复杂性,并探讨了基于这些因素的认定标准。文章还分析了现有反垄断法框架下相关市场界定的方法,如SSNIP测试法、SSNDQ测试法等,并结合数字经济的特点,提出了适用于数字经济领域的改进建议。最后,进一步说明了数字经济领域相关市场认定的实践应用,为反垄断执法机构在数字经济领域的执法工作提供参考。
Abstract: This article aims to explore the criteria for determining “relevant markets” in anti-monopoly cases within the digital economy domain. With the rapid development of the digital economy, the definition of digital platforms and their related markets has become an important issue in anti-monopoly enforcement. The article first reviews the concept of “relevant markets” in traditional anti-monopoly theory, then analyzes the particularity and complexity of the determination of “relevant markets” in the digital economy domain, and discusses the determination criteria based on these factors. The article also analyzes the methods for determining relevant markets under the current anti-monopoly legal framework, such as the SSNIP test method and the SSNDQ test method, and, in combination with the characteristics of the digital economy, proposes suggestions for improvement applicable to the digital economy domain. Finally, it further explains the practical application of determining relevant markets in the digital economy domain, providing a reference for anti-monopoly enforcement agencies in their enforcement work in the digital economy sector.
文章引用:赵艺霖. 数字经济领域反垄断“相关市场”的界定标准[J]. 国际会计前沿, 2025, 14(3): 762-770. https://doi.org/10.12677/fia.2025.143089

参考文献

[1] 王晓晔. 市场界定在反垄断并购审查中的地位和作用[J]. 中外法学, 2018, 30(5): 1324-1338.
[2] 兰磊. 反《反垄断法》上的“不相关”市场界定[J]. 中外法学, 2017, 29(6): 1647-1676.
[3] 江山. 论反垄断法规范中的规则与标准[J]. 环球法律评论, 2021, 43(3): 67-84.
[4] 戴龙. 论组织帮助型垄断协议的规制——兼议我国《反垄断法》的修订[J]. 法学评论, 2021, 39(1): 105-114.
[5] Stigler, G.J. (2019) Committee for the Study of Digital Platforms Market Structure and Antitrust Subcommittee. Report, University of Chicago Booth School of Business.
[6] 孙晋, 钟瑛嫦. 互联网平台型产业相关产品市场界定新解[J]. 现代法学, 2015, 37(6): 98-107.
[7] 丁晓东. 论数据垄断: 大数据视野下反垄断的法理思考[J]. 东方法学, 2021(3): 108-123.
[8] 王艺璇, 安真真. 注意力经济: 电商直播中消费者注意力的生产与控制[J]. 中国青年研究, 2021(2): 14-21.
[9] 唐要家, 唐春晖. 数字平台反垄断相关市场界定[J]. 财经问题研究, 2021(2): 33-41.
[10] 叶明. 互联网对相关产品市场界定的挑战及解决思路[J]. 社会科学研究, 2014(1): 9-16.
[11] 李剑. 多产品下的相关市场界定——基于中国经营者集中典型案例的反思[J]. 法学, 2019(10): 49-61.
[12] 金善明. 中国平台经济反垄断监管的挑战及其应对[J]. 国际经济评论, 2022(3): 125-155+7.