地方性文化参与企业数字化转型的机制研究——以两个县域民营制造企业的改革逻辑为例
Research on the Mechanism of Local Culture Participation in Corporate Digital Transformation—A Case Study of Reform Logic in Two County-Level Private Manufacturing Enterprises
摘要: 县域经济作为国民经济的基本单元,在城乡融合发展中扮演着关键角色。本研究基于人文经济学与结构化理论,选取无锡市县域中小微民营企业为研究对象,系统剖析地方性文化在企业数字化转型中的赋能机制。研究发现,“四千四万”精神等地方性文化资源通过塑造企业家精神、创新意识和团队协作能力,为企业数字化转型提供了内生动力。通过构建“文化–技术互构模型”,揭示了地方性文化基因与数字技术体系的双向建构机制:数字技术重构文化实践场景,将传统文化中的价值观念转化为数据驱动的决策逻辑;文化认知框架则塑造技术应用范式,为技术创新提供灵感来源。在此基础上,进一步提出地方性文化通过“认知框架–数字惯习–制度体系–生态网络”的四级传导机制,实现对企业数字化转型的全程赋能。研究不仅为破解县域经济“转型悖论”提供了理论框架,还提出构建“电商生态共同体”等实践路径,助力县域经济实现物质文明与精神文明协调发展的现代化目标。未来研究应进一步拓展地方性文化的差异化表达及其与数字技术的动态适配机制,结合多地域实证分析构建更具普适性的转型模型。
Abstract: As the fundamental unit of the national economy, county-level economies play a pivotal role in urban-rural integrated development. Grounded in humanistic economics and structuration theory, this study systematically investigates the enabling mechanisms of local culture in corporate digital transformation through an empirical analysis of small- and medium-sized private enterprises in Wuxi’s county-level regions. The findings reveal that local cultural resources, exemplified by the “Siqian Siwan” spirit (Four Perseverances and Four Tenacities), provide endogenous momentum for corporate digital transformation by shaping entrepreneurial ethos, innovative consciousness, and team collaboration capabilities. By developing a “culture-technology co-evolution model”, the study uncovers a bidirectional construction mechanism between local cultural genes and digital technology systems: digital technologies reconfigure cultural practice scenarios, transforming traditional cultural value systems into data-driven decision-making logic, while cultural cognitive frameworks shape technological application paradigms and provide inspiration for technological innovation. Furthermore, the research identifies a four-tier transmission mechanism—“cognitive framework-digital habitus-institutional system-ecological network”—through which local culture holistically empowers corporate digital transformation. The study not only constructs a theoretical framework to resolve the “transformation paradox” in county-level economies, but also proposes practical pathways such as building an “e-commerce ecosystem consortium” to help the county-level economy achieve the modernization goal of coordinated development of material and spiritual civilization. Future research should explore differentiated expressions of local culture and dynamic alignment mechanisms with digital technologies, while developing more universal transformation models through multi-regional empirical analyses.
文章引用:杨雅岚, 刘昱璘, 沈立, 沈承. 地方性文化参与企业数字化转型的机制研究——以两个县域民营制造企业的改革逻辑为例[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(6): 2026-2034. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.1461955

参考文献

[1] 郑有贵. 农民参与视角的乡镇企业组织制度变迁[J]. 宁夏社会科学, 2022(2): 79-88.
[2] 吴彤. 两种“地方性知识”——兼评吉尔兹和劳斯的观点[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2007(11): 87-94.
[3] 黄文记. 地方性知识驱动乡村文化振兴: 历史逻辑、价值共生与体系重构[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2023, 44(11): 186-193.
[4] Calkins, M. (2017) Digital Transformation Requires Disruptive Thinking. Harvard Business Review.
[5] 韦斯特曼, 博内, 麦卡菲. 数字革命: 引领企业转型[M]. 王冬萍, 译. 北京: 中信出版社, 2015.
[6] 郭重庆. 制造业数字化转型中的组织惯性及其突破——基于技术-制度-文化协同创新视角[J]. 管理世界, 2018(5): 161-172.
[7] 吉登斯, A. 社会的构成: 结构化理论纲要[M]. 李康, 李猛, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2016.
[8] 段进军. “行动-规则-空间”视角下人文经济学理论与实践思考[J]. 苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024, 45(3): 9-18.
[9] 任平, 李扬, 战炤磊, 等. 人文经济学: 高质量发展的人文密码(笔谈) [J]. 探索与争鸣, 2023(9): 144-158+180.
[10] Morley, D. (2002) Television, Audiences and Cultural Studies. Routledge.
[11] 谢立中. 主体性、实践意识、结构化: 吉登斯“结构化”理论再审视[J]. 学海, 2019(4): 40-48.