企业ESG表现对信贷融资的影响研究
Research on the Impact of Enterprise ESG Performance on Credit Financing
DOI: 10.12677/fia.2025.143098, PDF,   
作者: 周 媛:北方工业大学经济管理学院,北京
关键词: ESG信贷融资异质性检验ESG Credit Financing Heterogeneity Test
摘要: 随着我国经济社会发展不断深入,生态文明建设被纳入了中国特色社会主义事业总体布局,中国人民银行也陆续发布了各种绿色金融政策。从ESG行为视角研究企业的信贷融资问题,有助于企业作出合理的经济决策,所以本文以Wind金融数据库中2020~2022年A股制造业上市公司为样本,使用线性回归方法研究企业ESG表现对信贷融资的影响。研究结果表明,制造业ESG表现对信贷融资起到正向促进作用,该结论在一系列稳健性检验后依然成立。且进一步发现,东部地区企业与西部地区企业之间、重污染企业与绿色企业之间、国有企业以及非国有企业之间这种影响存在差异性。通过本次实证研究,一方面希望能够丰富我国在ESG方面的研究分析,另一方面也希望为解决企业融资困境建言献策。
Abstract: With the deepening of China’s economic and social development, the construction of ecological civilization has been incorporated into the overall layout of the cause of socialism with Chinese characteristics, and the People’s Bank of China has also successively issued various green finance policies. Studying the credit financing problems of enterprises from the perspective of ESG behavior will help enterprises make reasonable economic decisions. Therefore, this article takes A-share manufacturing listed companies in the Wind Financial Database from 2020 to 2022 as samples, and uses linear regression method to study the impact of corporate ESG performance on credit financing. The research results indicate that the ESG performance of manufacturing enterprises has a positive promoting effect on credit financing, and this conclusion still holds after a series of robustness tests. And it is further found that there are differences in this impact between enterprises in the eastern and western regions, between heavily polluting enterprises and green enterprises, and between state-owned and non-state-owned enterprises. Through this empirical study, on the one hand, we hope to enrich China’s research and analysis on ESG, and on the other hand, we also hope to provide certain reference suggestions for listed companies in financing issues.
文章引用:周媛. 企业ESG表现对信贷融资的影响研究[J]. 国际会计前沿, 2025, 14(3): 849-859. https://doi.org/10.12677/fia.2025.143098

参考文献

[1] 陈国进, 丁赛杰, 赵向琴, 等. 中国绿色金融政策、融资成本与企业绿色转型——基于央行担保品政策视角[J]. 金融研究, 2021(12): 75-95.
[2] 余静文, 李媛媛, 李濛西. 《物权法》实施对企业商业信用的影响——基于供应链上下游机制视角[J]. 金融经济学研究, 2021, 36(3): 76-90.
[3] 李增福, 冯柳华. 企业ESG表现与商业信用获取[J]. 财经研究, 2022, 48(12): 151-165.
[4] Tang, H. (2022) The Effect of ESG Performance on Corporate Innovation in China: The Mediating Role of Financial Constraints and Agency Cost. Sustainability, 14, Article 3769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Atz, U., Van Holt, T., Liu, Z.Z. and Bruno, C.C. (2022) Does Sustainability Generate Better Financial Performance? Review, Meta-Analysis, and Propositions. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 13, 802-825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Chang, H., Liang, L. and Liu, Y. (2021) Using Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) and Financial Indicators to Measure Bank Cost Efficiency in Asia. Sustainability, 13, Article 11139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Hamdi, K., Guenich, H. and Ben Saada, M. (2022) Does Corporate Financial Performance Promote ESG: Evidence from US Firms. Cogent Business & Management, 9, Article ID: 2154053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Kalia, D. and Aggarwal, D. (2022) Examining Impact of ESG Score on Financial Performance of Healthcare Companies. Journal of Global Responsibility, 14, 155-176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Choudhary, M.A. and Jain, A. (2022) Finance and Inequality: The Distributional Impacts of Bank Credit Rationing. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 52, Article ID: 100997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Kwon, S. (2021) A Credit Rationing Model of the Medium Risk Borrowers with Low Valued Collateral. Applied Economics Letters, 29, 1970-1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Hennart, J. (2022) How Much Is New in Brouthers et al.’s New Foreign Entry Modes, and Do They Challenge the Transaction Cost Theory of Entry Mode Choice? Journal of International Business Studies, 53, 2116-2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Quah, H., Haman, J. and Naidu, D. (2020) The Effect of Stock Liquidity on Investment Efficiency under Financing Constraints and Asymmetric Information: Evidence from the United States. Accounting & Finance, 61, 2109-2150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 陈婉. 上市公司ESG水平越高, 企业债券违约概率越低: 基于绿色和ESG评估体系的设计与实证[J]. 环境经济, 2018, 12(3): 46-49.
[14] Zhang, F., Qin, X. and Liu, L. (2020) The Interaction Effect between ESG and Green Innovation and Its Impact on Firm Value from the Perspective of Information Disclosure. Sustainability, 12, Article 1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 周方召, 潘婉颖, 付辉. 上市公司ESG责任表现与机构投资者持股偏好: 来自中国A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 科学决策, 2020(11): 15-41.
[16] 陈若鸿, 赵雪延, 金华. 企业ESG表现对其融资成本的影响[J]. 科学决策, 2022(11): 24-40.
[17] 李井林, 阳镇, 陈劲等. ESG促进企业绩效的机制研究——基于企业创新的视角[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2021, 42(9): 71-89.
[18] 吴灵丽. 数字普惠金融对中小企业融资约束的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2021.
[19] 李泉. 信贷供给对企业研发投入的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2021.
[20] 汪娇. 业绩承诺、信息不对称与融资约束[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 西南财经大学, 2022.
[21] 谭露. 高铁开通与融资约束[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 海口: 海南大学, 2020.
[22] 邱牧远, 殷红. 生态文明建设背景下企业ESG表现与融资成本[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2019, 36(3): 108-123.
[23] 韩乾, 袁宇菲, 吴博强. 短期国际资本流动与我国上市企业融资成本[J]. 经济研究, 2017, 52(6): 77-89.
[24] 谢红军, 吕雪. 负责任的国际投资: ESG与中国OFDI [J]. 经济研究, 2022, 57(3): 83-99.
[25] Lins, K.V., Servaes, H. and Tamayo, A. (2017) Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis. The Journal of Finance, 72, 1785-1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] 王丽青, 杨晓峰. ESG表现与企业融资成本的相关性研究[J]. 中国注册会计师, 2022(9): 47-53.