我国非物质文化遗产保护传承的区域协同立法研究
Research on Regional Collaborative Legislation for the Protection and Inheritance of Intangible Cultural Heritage in China
摘要: 当前我国已经初步建立起以《非物质文化遗产法》为核心的非遗法律制度体系。但由于我国非遗保护立法起步较晚,非遗法律保护仍存在诸多问题。非遗体系保护在面对制度分散、协调不足等情况时尤其在跨区域事务中,缺乏统一、有效的规范支撑,区域协同立法整合资源和统筹利益的现实价值日益凸显。基于此,本文拟构建系统化的非遗保护传承协同立法体制:由中央确立底线标准,地方因地制宜建构制度规则;同时,引入强制性利益共享与补偿机制;明确传承人、社会组织和企业的权责分配。从而实现文化生态的协同共生,促进区域协调发展,提升非遗保护的法治化水平。
Abstract: At present, China has initially established a legal system for the protection of intangible cultural heritage with the “Law on the Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage” as the core. However, due to the late start of legislation for the protection of intangible cultural heritage in China, there are still many problems in its legal protection. When facing situations such as fragmented systems and insufficient coordination, especially in cross-regional affairs, the protection of the intangible cultural heritage system lacks unified and effective normative support, and the practical value of regional collaborative legislation in integrating resources and coordinating interests has become increasingly prominent. Based on this, this paper intends to construct a systematic collaborative legislative system for the protection and inheritance of intangible cultural heritage: the central government should establish bottom-line standards, and local areas should construct institutional rules according to local conditions; at the same time, a mandatory mechanism for interest sharing and compensation should be introduced; and the distribution of rights and responsibilities among inheritors, social organizations, and enterprises should be clarified. In this way, the coordinated symbiosis of the cultural ecology can be realized, regional coordinated development can be promoted, and the level of the rule of law in the protection of intangible cultural heritage can be improved.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
王锴. 法律位阶判断标准的反思与运用[J]. 社会科学文摘, 2022(6): 99-101.
|
|
[2]
|
俞祺. 授权立法范围的合理界定[J]. 法学, 2024(2): 55-69.
|
|
[3]
|
李平原, 刘海潮. 探析奥斯特罗姆的多中心治理理论——从政府、市场、社会多元共治的视角[J]. 甘肃理论学刊, 2014(3): 127-130.
|
|
[4]
|
孙玉, 彭金玉. 国内对多中心治理理论应用的研究综述[J]. 学理论, 2016(11): 57-58.
|
|
[5]
|
韩业斌. 我国区域协同立法的动力困境与优化路径[J]. 兰州学刊, 2023(8): 103-114.
|
|
[6]
|
王悦玥. 区域知识产权一体化下的技术转移协同立法研究[J]. 电子知识产权, 2024(2): 40-52.
|
|
[7]
|
李德旺, 叶必丰. 地方变通立法的法律界限与冲突解决[J]. 社会科学, 2022(3): 83-96.
|
|
[8]
|
肖爱. 正本清源: 区域协同立法的基本要义与性质辨正[J]. 政治与法律, 2024(10): 19-36.
|
|
[9]
|
贺海仁. 我国区域协同立法的实践样态及其法理思考[J]. 法律适用, 2020(21): 69-78.
|
|
[10]
|
孟婷钰. 长三角区域环境协同法治研究[J]. 湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版), 2024, 21(9): 94-98.
|
|
[11]
|
耿海清, 余剑锋, 李博, 等. 京津冀及周边地区大气污染防治协作机制探析[J]. 环境影响评价, 2020, 42(5): 26-29.
|
|
[12]
|
赵伟英. 粤港澳大湾区协同立法的现实困境与实践进路[J]. 地方立法研究, 2024, 9(5): 105-119.
|
|
[13]
|
陈光. 区域立法与中央和地方立法关系的完善[J]. 西部法学评论, 2009(6): 25-30.
|
|
[14]
|
封丽霞. 区域协同立法的制度功能及其实现[J]. 政治与法律, 2025(1): 109-122.
|
|
[15]
|
宋才发. 地方立法的质量、困境与出路研究[J]. 山东行政学院学报, 2022(3): 30-39.
|
|
[16]
|
吴叶乾. 地方立法设定激励性监管措施的特别程序[J]. 西部法学评论, 2025(1): 95-109.
|
|
[17]
|
谢慧, 张彤. 我国非物质文化遗产知识产权保护路径探究[J]. 黑河学院学报, 2025, 16(4): 35-38+46.
|