附加权重的LSTM神经网络页岩气产量预测——以HS井区为例
Shale Gas Production Forecasting Using Additional Weights LSTM Neural Network—A Case Study of the HS Well Area
DOI: 10.12677/me.2025.134094, PDF,   
作者: 甘世泽:重庆科技大学石油与天然气工程学院,重庆;谭鑫龙:潮州深能燃气有限公司,广东 潮州
关键词: 页岩气机器学习产量预测LSTM附加权重Shale Gas Machine Learning Production Forecasting LSTM Additional Weights
摘要: 现阶段机器学习作为页岩气产量预测的一种有效手段,在数据规模受限的开发新区却往往无法进行准确预测。针对此问题,提出了附加权重的LSTM神经网络预测应用。首先使用HS页岩气井区地质参数、工程参数和生产参数的训练数据建立标准LSTM预测模型,获得产量预测拟合公式;其次通过机器学习方法交叉分析确定影响因素对测试产量的影响权重,然后在初始LSTM模型引入附加权重来优化预测矩阵并进行产量预测,最后应用模型对区块老井与新井的各项参数进行优化。预测结果表明,附加权重后的LSTM模型预测值与真实值吻合度更高,优化结果可靠,可以很好地解决数据量受限井区的机器学习分析与优化问题。
Abstract: Machine learning serves as an effective means for shale gas production forecasting at the current stage. However, accurate predictions are often challenging in newly developed areas with limited data. To address this issue, an additional weights Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural network prediction approach is proposed. Initially, a standard LSTM prediction model is established using a training dataset comprising geological parameters, engineering parameters, and production parameters from the HS shale gas well area, obtaining a production prediction fitting formula. Subsequently, a machine learning approach is employed for cross-analysis to determine the impact weights of influencing factors on test production. These weights are then introduced into the initial LSTM model as additional weights to optimize the prediction matrix and enhance production forecasting. The results indicate that the LSTM model with additional weights yields predictions that closely align with real values, yielding reliable optimization results and providing an effective solution to machine-learning analysis and optimization in data-scarce well blocks.
文章引用:甘世泽, 谭鑫龙. 附加权重的LSTM神经网络页岩气产量预测——以HS井区为例[J]. 矿山工程, 2025, 13(4): 836-845. https://doi.org/10.12677/me.2025.134094

参考文献

[1] 邹才能, 董大忠, 王社教, 等. 中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2010, 37(6): 641-653.
[2] 张金川, 徐波, 聂海宽, 等. 中国页岩气资源勘探潜力[J]. 天然气工业, 2008(6): 136-140+159-160.
[3] 陈娟, 黄浩勇, 刘俊辰, 等. 基于GA-BP神经网络的长宁地区页岩气水平井产能预测技术[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2020, 20(5): 1851-1858.
[4] 韩克宁, 王伟, 樊冬艳, 等. 基于产量递减与LSTM耦合的常压页岩气井产量预测[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 647-656.
[5] Chen, X., Li, J., Gao, P. and Zhou, J. (2022) Prediction of Shale Gas Horizontal Wells Productivity after Volume Fracturing Using Machine Learning—An LSTM Approach. Petroleum Science and Technology, 40, 1861-1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Kocoglu, Y., Gorell, S. and McElroy, P. (2021) Application of Bayesian Optimized Deep Bi-LSTM Neural Networks for Production Forecasting of Gas Wells in Unconventional Shale Gas Reservoirs. Proceedings of the 9th Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Houston, 26-28 July 2021, 2176-2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Wang, T., Wang, Q., Shi, J., Zhang, W., Ren, W., Wang, H., et al. (2021) Productivity Prediction of Fractured Horizontal Well in Shale Gas Reservoirs with Machine Learning Algorithms. Applied Sciences, 11, Article 12064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Yang, R., Liu, X., Yu, R., Hu, Z. and Duan, X. (2022) Long Short-Term Memory Suggests a Model for Predicting Shale Gas Production. Applied Energy, 322, Article 119415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Zhai, S., Geng, S., Li, C., Gong, Y., Jing, M. and Li, Y. (2022) Prediction of Gas Production Potential Based on Machine Learning in Shale Gas Field: A Case Study. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 44, 6581-6601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Hui, G., Chen, S., He, Y., Wang, H. and Gu, F. (2021) Machine Learning-Based Production Forecast for Shale Gas in Unconventional Reservoirs via Integration of Geological and Operational Factors. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 94, Article 104045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Marcilio, W.E. and Eler, D.M. (2020) From Explanations to Feature Selection: Assessing SHAP Values as Feature Selection Mechanism. 2020 33rd SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images (SIBGRAPI), Porto de Galinhas, 7-10 November 2020, 340-347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Van den Broeck, G., Lykov, A., Schleich, M. and Suciu, D. (2022) On the Tractability of SHAP Explanations. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 74, 851-886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 谢兆贤, 邹兴敏, 张文静. 大型数据集的高效参数剪枝决策树算法研究[J]. 计算机工程, 2024, 50(1): 156-165.
[14] Safavian, S.R. and Landgrebe, D. (1991) A Survey of Decision Tree Classifier Methodology. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 21, 660-674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 李福祥, 王雪, 张驰, 等. 基于边界点的支持向量机分类算法[J]. 陕西理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 38(3): 30-38.
[16] Wang, H. and Hu, D. (2005) Comparison of SVM and LS-SVM for Regression. 2005 International Conference on Neural Networks and Brain, Beijing, 13-15 October 2005, 279-283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef