《计量语言学学报》的计量特征分析——基于2007~2024年发表文章的研究
Analysis of the Quantitative Characteristics of the Journal of Quantitative Linguistics—A Study Based on Articles Published from 2007 to 2024
DOI: 10.12677/ml.2025.138854, PDF,   
作者: 崔 超：内蒙古农业大学外国语学院，内蒙古 呼和浩特
关键词: 文献计量学；语料库分析；Scopus数据库；研究趋势；Bibliometrics； Corpus Analysis； Scopus Database； Research Trends
摘要: 本研究运用文献计量学方法，对《计量语言学学报》2007~2024年发表的342篇文章的标题、摘要及Scopus引文信息展开分析。结果显示，期刊研究主题集中在语言、文本、英语、词汇和汉语等方面，计量研究方法占主导。研究趋势上，文本分析热度下降，依存和句法分析成近年热点。中国研究人员数量显著增加，居该领域领先地位，论文作者和机构分布呈现学科多元化与国际化趋势。
Abstract: This study uses bibliometric methods to analyze 342 articles published in the Journal of Quantitative Linguistics from 2007 to 2024, including their titles, abstracts, and citation information from Scopus. The results show that the journal’s research topics focus on language, text, English, vocabulary, and Chinese, with quantitative research methods dominating. In terms of research trends, the popularity of text analysis has declined, while dependency and syntactic analysis have become hotspots in recent years. The number of researchers from China has increased significantly, taking a leading position in this field, and the distribution of authors and institutions of the papers shows a trend of disciplinary diversification and internationalization.
文章引用：崔超. 《计量语言学学报》的计量特征分析——基于2007~2024年发表文章的研究[J]. 现代语言学, 2025, 13(8): 426-435. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2025.138854

参考文献

[1] Lei, L. and Liu, D. (2019) Research Trends in Applied Linguistics from 2005 to 2016: A Bibliometric Analysis and Its Implications. Applied Linguistics, 40, 540-561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] Lei, L. and Liu, D. (2019) The Research Trends and Contributions of System’s Publications over the Past Four Decades (1973-2017): A Bibliometric Analysis. System, 80, 1-13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] 单谊. 基于文献计量的国外实验语用学研究态势探析[J]. 外国语文, 2024, 40(2): 24-37.
[4] Liu, Z. (2022) Mapping the Research Trends of Third Language Acquisition: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on Scopus. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1021517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Birkle, C., Pendlebury, D.A., Schnell, J. and Adams, J. (2020) Web of Science as a Data Source for Research on Scientific and Scholarly Activity. Quantitative Science Studies, 1, 363-376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] 袁国廷. 基于文献计量和形势概念分析语言学发展态势研究[J]. 宜春学院学报, 2019, 41(5): 73-80.
[7] Georgas, H. and Cullars, J. (2005) A Citation Study of the Characteristics of the Linguistics Literature. College & Research Libraries, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Ellegaard, O. and Wallin, J.A. (2015) The Bibliometric Analysis of Scholarly Production: How Great Is the Impact? Scientometrics, 105, 1809-1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] CheshmehSohrabi, M. and Mashhadi, A. (2023) Using Data Mining, Text Mining, and Bibliometric Techniques to the Research Trends and Gaps in the Field of Language and Linguistics. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 52, 607-630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] He, S. and Shaari, A.H. (2025) Hot Spots and Emerging Trends in ‘Event’ Research in Linguistics (2001-2023): A Bibliometric Analysis. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 12, Article 2488086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Pearson, W.S. (2021) Quoted Speech in Linguistics Research Article Titles: Patterns of Use and Effects on Citations. Scientometrics, 126, 3421-3442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]