科技成果转化中初创企业与在位企业竞合的战略选择
Strategic Choices in Coopetition between Start-Ups and Incumbents during Technology Commercialization
DOI: 10.12677/mm.2025.158236, PDF,   
作者: 徐 珅*, 董广茂:西安工业大学经济管理学院,陕西 西安
关键词: 科技成果转化初创企业在位企业竞合Technology Commercialization Start-Ups Incumbents Coopetition
摘要: 在科技成果转化过程中,初创企业与在位企业的竞合关系直接影响到企业收益。本研究通过构建初创企业与在位企业竞合模型,量化分析自主转化与合作转化收益差异,揭示双方战略选择的内在机制。研究发现:自主转化收益与自身研发成功概率、科技成果转化能力正相关,且与创新竞争对手的研发成功概率及创新价值呈负相关。合作转化中,合作选择取决于初创企业的创新成功概率,存在合作决策阈值 Z :当 Z>0 时,创新成功概率低、颠覆性潜力强的初创企业将会与在位企业达成合作;当 Z<0 时,创新成功概率高、颠覆性潜力弱的初创企业将会与在位企业达成合作,突破传统以技术为唯一优先考量的合作逻辑。
Abstract: In the process of technology commercialization, the coopetition relationship between start-ups and incumbents exerts a direct impact on their respective benefits. This research constructs a coopetition model for the two types of enterprises, quantitatively analyzes the benefit discrepancies between independent commercialization and cooperative commercialization, and reveals the inherent mechanism underlying the strategic choices of both parties. The results indicate that: the benefits of independent commercialization are positively correlated with an enterprise’s own R&D success rate and technology commercialization capability, while negatively correlated with the R&D success probability and innovation value of its innovative competitors. In cooperative commercialization, the cooperation decision hinges on the innovation success rate of start-ups, with a cooperative decision threshold Z identified: when Z>0 , start-ups with a low probability of successful innovation but strong disruptive potential will cooperate with incumbents; when Z<0 , start-ups featuring high innovation success rates but weak disruptive potential will engage in cooperation with incumbents. This finding breaks through the traditional cooperation logic that prioritizes technology as the sole criterion.
文章引用:徐珅, 董广茂. 科技成果转化中初创企业与在位企业竞合的战略选择[J]. 现代管理, 2025, 15(8): 275-284. https://doi.org/10.12677/mm.2025.158236

参考文献

[1] Yang, X., Yang, Y., Wang, F., Zhou, M. and Wang, Y. (2024) Evaluation and Convergence Analysis of Science and Technology Innovation Efficiency in China’s National Central Cities Based on the Super-Efficiency SBM-ML Model. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2024, 1-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 秦宇. 科技商业化、市场化与经济增长——基于科技资源投入视角[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2017(4): 82-88.
[3] Schumpeter, J.A. (1942) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper.
[4] Ehrig, T. and Zenger, T. (2024) Competing with Theories: Using Awareness and Confidence to Secure Resources and Rents. Strategy Science, 9, 416-432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Carayannopoulos, S. (2017) Small, Young Firm Flexibility and Performance in the Context of Disruptive Innovations. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 21, 105-118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Gans, J.S. and Stern, S. (2003) The Product Market and the Market for “Ideas”: Commercialization Strategies for Technology Entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 32, 333-350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Freeman, J. and Engel, J.S. (2007) Models of Innovation: Startups and Mature Corporations. California Management Review, 50, 94-119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] West, J. (2008) Commercializing Open Science: Deep Space Communications as the Lead Market for Shannon Theory, 1960-73. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 1506-1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 袁忆, 张旭, 郭菊娥. 科技成果转化价值活动的商业模式探析[J]. 管理评论, 2019, 31(7): 13-21.
[10] 张亚明, 赵科, 刘海鸥, 等. 协同创新驱动科技成果转化效率提升的多元路径与异质性研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2024(10): 42-52.
[11] Henkel, J., Rønde, T. and Wagner, M. (2015) And the Winner Is—Acquired. Entrepreneurship as a Contest Yielding Radical Innovations. Research Policy, 44, 295-310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Weiblen, T. and Chesbrough, H.W. (2015) Engaging with Startups to Enhance Corporate Innovation. California Management Review, 57, 66-90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Prashantham, S. and Kumar, K. (2019) Engaging with Startups: MNC Perspectives. IIMB Management Review, 31, 407-417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Teece, D.J. (1986) Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy. Research Policy, 15, 285-305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Avnimelech, G. and Amit, A. (2024) From Startup Nation to Open Innovation Nation: The Evolution of Open Innovation Activities within the Israeli Entrepreneurial Ecosystem. Research Policy, 53, Article 105079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Arora, A., Belenzon, S. and Patacconi, A. (2019) A Theory of the US Innovation Ecosystem: Evolution and the Social Value of Diversity. Industrial and Corporate Change, 28, 289-307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Hammoudeh, M., Krieger, J. and Xu, J. (2024) Dusting off the Old Ones: Drug Licensing to Startups, Innovation Success and Efficiency. Harvard Business School.
[18] Ching, H.Y. and Caetano, R.M. (2021) Dynamics of Corporate Startup Collaboration: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Management Research, 13, 1-28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Gulati, R., Wohlgezogen, F. and Zhelyazkov, P. (2012) The Two Facets of Collaboration: Cooperation and Coordination in Strategic Alliances. Academy of Management Annals, 6, 531-583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Clauss, T. and Bouncken, R.B. (2019) Social Power as an Antecedence of Governance in Buyer-Supplier Alliances. Industrial Marketing Management, 77, 75-89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Bouncken, R.B., Fredrich, V., Ritala, P. and Kraus, S. (2020) Value-Creation-Capture-Equilibrium in New Product Development Alliances: A Matter of Coopetition, Expert Power, and Alliance Importance. Industrial Marketing Management, 90, 648-662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Arora, A., Fosfuri, A. and Rønde, T. (2024) The Missing Middle: Value Capture in the Market for Startups. Research Policy, 53, Article 104958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef